Biorefinery of waste activated sludge: Nutrient recovery and microbial lipid production by Yarrowia lipolytica DOI
Juan F. Moreno, Paula Oulego, Sergio Collado

и другие.

Journal of Environmental Management, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 363, С. 121315 - 121315

Опубликована: Июнь 7, 2024

Язык: Английский

Enhancing waste management and nutrient recovery: Preparation of N slow-release fertilizer using sewage sludge and its release behavior, effects on ryegrass(Lolium perenne L.)growth DOI
Diannan Huang, Yu Gao, Li Zhang

и другие.

Biochemical Engineering Journal, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 109664 - 109664

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge treatment and disposal technologies based on carbon emissions and environmental impacts DOI
Diannan Huang, Yuhan Wu, Li Zhang

и другие.

Environmental Technology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 17

Опубликована: Май 31, 2024

This study aimed to create a comprehensive evaluation method for sewage sludge (SS) treatment and disposal technologies, considering carbon emission environmental impacts. Life cycle assessment (LCA) were conducted on six SS technologies in China. The assessments used the IPCC factor approach calculate emissions CML2001 determine impact factors. Additionally, colour-coded was implemented quantify results. found that S1 (anaerobic digestion + land application) had lowest impact, making it optimal technology. scenario of 669 kg CO2(t DS)−1 impacts 5.20E-10. A sensitivity analysis show each unit total results showed landfilling has high Therefore, controlling greenhouse gases toxic substances landfills is crucial reducing pollution.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Life Cycle Assessment in the Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification of Land-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: Gaps and Opportunities DOI Creative Commons
Yuan Yao, Bingquan Zhang

Environmental Science & Technology, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Март 27, 2025

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been widely used to evaluate the carbon negativity and environmental impacts of dioxide removal (CDR) pathways. Various monitoring, reporting, verification (MRV) protocols have developed assess credits CDR projects within voluntary compliant markets. Many MRV incorporate life thinking, LCA methods, data. This perspective examined recent studies published by main registries, focusing on four critical land-based methods: bioenergy combined with capture storage, biochar, enhanced rock weathering, afforestation reforestation. We compared accounting impact methods employed in these identify their methodological similarities differences. Our analysis reveals that community can support providing insights into baselines, additionality, uncertainty, multifunctionality, safeguards, holistic emission factors, overlooked pools. recommend future research prioritize timing, permanence, scaling, dynamic modeling for CDR. Addressing co-benefit land use change will further benefit both development. Collaboration between communities is essential developing robust frameworks markets policymaking.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Effects of calcium/iron-rich sludge on the ash fusion characteristics of sugarcane bagasse under oxygen-enriched atmosphere DOI
Ziqiang Yang, Chuanxiang Zhang, Fenghai Li

и другие.

Energy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 135808 - 135808

Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Biorefinery of waste activated sludge: Nutrient recovery and microbial lipid production by Yarrowia lipolytica DOI
Juan F. Moreno, Paula Oulego, Sergio Collado

и другие.

Journal of Environmental Management, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 363, С. 121315 - 121315

Опубликована: Июнь 7, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2