Frontiers in Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
11
Опубликована: Июнь 18, 2024
Background
The
global
spread
of
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
underscores
the
urgent
need
for
reliable
methods
to
forecast
disease’s
severity
and
outcome,
thereby
facilitating
timely
interventions
reducing
mortality
rates.
This
study
focuses
on
evaluating
clinical
laboratory
profiles
patients
with
Omicron
variant-induced
COVID-19
pneumonia
assessing
efficacy
various
scoring
systems
in
prognosticating
disease
mortality.
Methods
In
this
retrospective
analysis,
we
examined
records
409
individuals
diagnosed
variant
pneumonia.
We
documented
Pneumonia
Severity
Index,
CURB-65,
MuLBSTA
scores
within
first
24
h
analyzed
sensitivity,
specificity,
positive
predictive
value,
negative
area
under
receiver
operating
characteristic
curve
each
system
ascertain
their
accuracy
fatality
risk.
Results
cohort’s
median
age
was
78
years,
predominantly
presenting
fever,
cough,
expectoration,
fatigue,
gastrointestinal
symptoms.
Factors
such
as
Glasgow
Coma
Scale
score,
lactate
dehydrogenase
levels,
procalcitonin,
creatinine
co-occurrence
acute
respiratory
distress
syndrome
were
identified
independent
predictors
severity.
Furthermore,
age,
oxygenation
index,
glucose
dehydrogenase,
septic
shock
independently
associated
For
severe
prediction,
PSI,
demonstrated
sensitivities
65.9%,
63.8%,
79.7%,
respectively,
specificities
76.8%,
60.9%,
AUROCs
0.707,
0.750,
0.728.
To
predict
risk,
these
at
cutoffs
1.5,
102.5,
12.5
exhibited
83.3%,
96.3%,
70.4%,
59.4%,
60.8%,
65.4%,
0.787,
0.850,
0.736,
respectively.
Conclusion
cohort
comprised
elderly
pre-existing
health
conditions.
Elevated
emerged
a
significant
marker
both
prognosis,
sputum
production,
symptoms,
GCS
creatinine,
PCT,
ARDS
severity,
patients.
Among
evaluated,
Index
superior
capability
mortality,
suggesting
its
utility
forecasting
outcomes
EClinicalMedicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
69, С. 102468 - 102468
Опубликована: Фев. 9, 2024
BackgroundAzvudine
and
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir
are
approved
to
treat
mild-to-moderate
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
in
adults
with
a
high
risk
for
progression
severe
infection.
We
sought
compare
the
antiviral
effectiveness
clinical
outcomes
of
elderly
patients
COVID-19
receiving
these
two
agents.MethodsIn
this
observational
study,
we
identified
249
infection
who
were
admitted
Second
Medical
Center
People's
Liberation
Army
General
Hospital
from
December
2022
January
2023,
including
128
azvudine
recipients,
66
recipients
55
not
received
treatments.
compared
cycle
threshold
(Ct)
value
dynamic
change
all
three
groups.
The
primary
outcome
was
composite
progression,
all-cause
death,
intensive
care
unit
admission,
initiation
invasive
mechanical
ventilation.
enrolled
followed
up
electronic
medical
record
system.
Kaplan–Meier
Cox
proportional
regression
analyses
used
To
more
directly
drugs,
performed
propensity-score
matching
between
groups
efficacy
matched
population.FindingsAmong
(mean
age,
91.41
years),
77
died
during
follow-up
period.
When
did
receive
any
antivirals,
neither
nor
demonstrated
survival
benefit.
analysis
death
showed
that
0.730
(0.423–1.262)
group
0.802
(0.435–1.480)
non-antiviral
group.
After
propensity
score
matching,
included
58
recipients.
fitted
curve
Ct
after
illustrated
rate
viral
decline
early
stage
treatment
seems
surpass
azvudine,
but
there
no
statistical
significance.
Azvudine
seemly
associated
lower
(HR:1.676,
95%
CI:0.805–3.488)
short-term
(HR:
1.291,
95%CI:
0.546–3.051).InterpretationPatients
have
similar
trend
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.
In
limited
series,
significant
This
lack
benefit
might
be
attributed
potential
bias.FundingThis
study
supported
by
"National
Key
R&D
Program
China"
(Funding
No.
2020YFC2008900)
National
Defense
Science
Technology
Innovation
Special
Zone
Project
(223-CXCY-N101-07-18-01).
Abstract
Background
Azvudine
has
been
approved
for
the
treatment
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
patients
in
China,
and
this
meta-analysis
aims
to
illustrate
safety
azvudine
its
effectiveness
reducing
mortality.
Methods
PubMed,
Embase,
Web
science,
Cochrane
Library
Epistemonikos
COVID-19
Living
Overview
Evidence
database
(L.OVE)
were
searched
aggregate
currently
published
studies.
risk
bias
tool
ROBINS-I
used
assess
randomized
controlled
study
cohort
respectively.
Odds
radios
(ORs)
with
95%
confidence
interval
(CIs)
combined
dichotomous
variables.
Publication
was
assessed
by
Egger’s
test
funnel
plots.
Results
A
total
184
articles
retrieved
from
included
databases
17
studies
into
final
analysis.
Pooled
analysis
showed
that
significantly
reduced
mortality
compared
controls
(OR:
0.41,
95%CI
0.31–0.54,
p
<
0.001).
Besides,
either
mild
moderate
or
severe
could
benefit
administration.
There
no
significant
difference
incidence
ICU
admission
0.90,
0.47–1.72,
=
0.74)
invasive
ventilation
0.94,
0.54–1.62,
0.82)
between
control
group.
The
adverse
events
similar
1.26,
0.59–2.70,
0.56).
Conclusions
This
suggests
reduce
patients,
administration
is
acceptable.
Trial
registration
PROSPERO;
No.:
CRD42023462988;
URL:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
.
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
13(11), С. 4655 - 4660
Опубликована: Июль 13, 2023
In
our
retrospective
cohort
study,
we
aim
to
explore
whether
Azvudine
modifies
the
risk
of
death
in
COVID-19
patients.
It
was
conducted
on
medical
records
patients,
consecutively
admitted
for
pneumonia
two
hospitals
Chongqing,
China.
Based
treatment
exposure,
patients
were
divided
into
group
and
non-Azvudine
group.
We
used
1:2
ratio
propensity
score
matching
(PSM)
study
adjust
confounding
factors
differences
between
groups.
There
1072
included
original
cohort.
With
PSM,
195
390
The
results
showed
that
associated
with
improved
in-hospital
mortality
overall
population
(OR
0.375,
95%
CI
0.225-0.623,
P
<
0.001),
severe
subgroup
0.239,
0.107-0.535,
=
critical
0.091,
0.011-0.769,
0.028)
matched
univariate
analysis.
And
there
a
significantly
lower
(11%
vs.
24%,
P<0.001),
sub-group
(10%
32%,
0.001)
(5%
34%,
0.017)
These
suggest
can
reduce
severe,
population.
BMC Infectious Diseases,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
24(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 8, 2024
Abstract
Background
and
aim
Two
oral
antivirals
(Nirmatrelvir-
ritonavir
Azvudine)
are
widely
used
in
China
practice
during
the
Omicron
wave
of
pandemic.
However,
little
evidence
regarding
real-world
effectiveness
these
two
in-hospital
patients.
We
aimed
to
evaluate
clinical
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
versus
azvudine
among
adult
hospitalized
patients
with
COVID-19.
Methods
This
retrospective
cohort
study
data
from
three
Chinese
PLA
General
Hospital
medical
centres.
Hospitalized
COVID-19
treated
or
Dec
10,
2022,
February
20,
2023,
did
not
require
invasive
ventilation
support
on
admission
were
eligible
for
inclusion.
Results
After
exclusions
propensity-score
matching,
final
analysis
included
486
recipients
recipients.
By
28
days
initiation
antivirus
treatment,
crude
incidence
rate
all-cause
death
was
similar
both
types
treatment
(nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
group
2.8
events
1000
person-days
[95%
CI,
2.1–3.6]
vs
3.4
events/1000
2.6–4.3],
P
=
0.38).
Landmark
showed
that
lower
(3.5%)
than
(6.8%,
0.029)
within
initial
10-day
period,
while
no
significant
difference
observed
results
between
10
follow-up.
There
cumulative
composite
disease
progression
event
(8.6%
vs.
10.1%
azvudine,
HR,
1.22;
95%
CI
0.80–1.86,
0.43).
Conclusion
Among
omicron
Beijing,
outcomes
receiving
azvudine.
it
is
worth
noticing
appears
hold
an
advantage
over
reducing
early
mortality.
Further
randomized
controlled
trials
needed
verify
efficacy
those
medications
especially
treatment.
BMC Infectious Diseases,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
24(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 3, 2024
Abstract
Purpose
To
explore
the
effect
of
azvudine
as
compared
to
paxlovid
for
oral
treatment
hospitalized
patients
with
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Methods
We
analyzed
data
from
a
cohort
infection
in
Shandong
provincial
hospital
between
February
15
and
March
15,
2023.
The
primary
outcome
was
time
sustained
clinical
recovery
through
Day
28
secondary
outcomes
included
percentage
participants
who
died
any
cause
by
28,
average
hospitilization
expenses,
changes
liver
kidney
function
adverse
events.
Kaplan–Meier
method
Cox
regression
model
used
statistical
analysis.
Results
There
no
significant
difference
terms
(
p
=
0.429)
death
rates
0.687).
As
hospitalization
fee,
differences
were
observed
group
(Hospitalization
time:
0.633;
Hospitalization
fee:
0.820).
In
addition,
there
effects
two
drugs
on
>
0.05).
Conclusion
Among
adults
hospitalised
infection,
noninferior
recovery,
rates,
cost,
few
safety
concerns.
Trial
registration
ChiCTR2300071309;
Registered
11
May
Level
evidence
III;
Retrospective
study.
Journal of Medical Virology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
95(8)
Опубликована: Июль 31, 2023
Abstract
There
is
no
antiviral
study
on
hemodialysis
patients
infected
with
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19),
especially
the
application
of
2′‐deoxy‐2′‐β
‐fluoro‐4′‐azidocytidine
(Azvudine,
FNC)
therapy.
We
conducted
a
multicenter
observational
involving
1008
patients.
After
matching
for
age,
sex,
and
other
factors,
182
in
basic
treatment
group
FNC
were
included.
The
negative
nucleic
acid
conversion
rate
was
significantly
higher
than
that
group,
viral
loads,
interleukin‐6,
C‐reactive
protein
lower
those
(
p
<
0.05).
significant
differences
liver
function,
renal
or
number
adverse
events
between
two
groups
>
In
conclusion,
our
has
provided
novel
evidence
suggesting
scheme
may
be
safe
effective
compared
to
common
COVID‐19.
Infectious Diseases and Therapy,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(8), С. 2087 - 2102
Опубликована: Июль 24, 2023
Azvudine
and
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
are
more
extensively
used
to
treat
COVID-19
in
China
due
their
earlier
approval
by
the
National
Medical
Products
Administration.
However,
there
has
been
a
scarcity
of
research
directly
comparing
clinical
outcomes
between
azvudine
till
now.
We
aimed
make
head-to-head
comparison
efficacy
safety
or
hospitalized
patients
with
China.
This
retrospective
cohort
study
was
conducted
using
data
collected
from
Tongde
Hospital
Zhejiang
Province
December
2022
January
2023.
All-cause
mortality,
risk
progressing
critical
condition,
proportion
nucleic-acid
negative
conversion
(PNANC),
time
first
(TFNANC),
length
hospital
stay
incidence
adverse
events
were
systematically
assessed
as
outcomes.
Multi-model
regression
analysis,
propensity-score-matching
subgroup
analysis
several
sensitivity
analyses
applied
compare
these
included
total
1571
COVID-19,
among
whom
272
received
156
azvudine.
found
no
significant
differences
all-cause
mortality
(HR
1.41;
95%
CI
0.56-3.56;
P
=
0.471),
1.67;
0.78-3.60;
0.189),
PNANC
0.87;
0.69-1.09;
0.220),
(β
-
0.82;
2.78
1.15;
0.414)
event
rate
(3.21%
vs.
4.41%,
0.538)
two
groups,
although
slightly
less
effective
than
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.
Meanwhile,
group
exhibited
significantly
longer
TFNANC
2.53;
0.76-4.29;
0.005)
group.
Results
similar
for
propensity-score
matching
multiple
analyses.
probably
possessed
comparable
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir,
it
some
Infection and Drug Resistance,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
Volume 16, С. 6053 - 6060
Опубликована: Сен. 1, 2023
Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir,
also
known
as
paxlovid,
is
a
widely
used
antiviral
drug
against
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19).
Azvudine,
previously
to
treat
human
immunodeficiency
virus-1,
has
been
COVID-19
in
China.
However,
only
few
clinical
studies
have
evaluated
the
effects
of
azvudine.
Additionally,
comparing
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
with
azvudine
limited
number.We
carried
out
retrospective
case‒control
analysis
at
Third
People's
Hospital
Tibet
Autonomous
Region.
Eighty-two
eligible
patients
who
received
treatment
were
included.
A
total
145
control
selected
by
propensity
score
matching
for
age,
sex,
severity
disease,
and
initial
cycle
threshold
values.
comparison
nucleic
acid
test
negative
conversion
time,
length
hospitalization,
mortality
rate
was
conducted.Overall,
mean
time
comparable
between
groups
(7.0
[11.0,
15.0]
vs
9.0
[6.0,
12.0]
days,
P=0.064).
mild
COVID-19,
significantly
shorter
group
than
(6.0
[5.0,
8.0]
8.0
11.0]
P=0.029).
The
did
not
differ
hospitalization
(8.0
[5.5,10.5]
[5.0,10.0]
P=0.378).
Regarding
rate,
there
4
(2.8%)
deaths
3
(3.7%)
(P=0.706).Azvudine
generally
effective
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir,
but
could
suppress
virus
more
rapidly.
For
those
cannot
be
treated
might
an
therapy
COVID-19.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 9, 2024
Abstract
This
study
aimed
to
explore
the
effectiveness
and
safety
of
azvudine,
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir,
molnupiravir
in
adult
patients
with
mild-to-moderate
COVID-19.
retrospective
cohort
included
COVID-19
(asymptomatic,
mild,
common
types)
at
First
Hospital
Changsha
(Hunan
Province,
China)
between
March
November
2022.
Eligible
were
classified
into
or
groups
according
antiviral
agents
they
received.
The
outcomes
times
nucleic
acid
negative
conversion
(NANC).
157
treated
azvudine
(n
=
66),
nirmatrelvir/ritonavir
25).
There
no
statistically
significant
differences
time
from
diagnosis
NANC
among
molnupiravir,
[median,
9
(95%
CI
9–11)
vs.
11
10–12)
8–12)
days,
P
0.15],
administration
8–10)
10
9.48–11)
8.708
7.51–11)
0.50],
hospital
stay
11–13)
13
12–14)
12
10–14)
0.14],
even
after
adjustment
for
sex,
age,
type,
comorbidities,
Ct
level,
treatment,
number
symptoms.
cumulative
rates
15.2%/12.3%/16.0%
day
5
(
0.858),
34.8%/21.5%/32.0%
7
0.226),
66.7%/52.3%/60.0%
days
0.246),
86.4%/86.2%/80.0%
14
0.721).
No
serious
adverse
events
reported.
Azvudine
may
be
comparable
regarding
NANC,
stay,
AEs.