
European Journal of Radiology Open, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14, С. 100662 - 100662
Опубликована: Май 31, 2025
Язык: Английский
European Journal of Radiology Open, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14, С. 100662 - 100662
Опубликована: Май 31, 2025
Язык: Английский
Journal of the American Heart Association, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 19, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Journal of Clinical Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14(10), С. 3503 - 3503
Опубликована: Май 16, 2025
Background: While early risk stratification in STEMI is essential, the threat of cardiogenic shock (CS) persists after revascularization due to reperfusion injury and evolving instability. However, prediction later phases—after revascularization—is less explored, despite its importance guiding intensive care decisions. This study evaluates machine learning (ML) models for dynamic assessment interventional cardiology cardiac unit (CICU) phases, where timely detection deterioration can guide treatment escalation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical procedural data from 158 patients diagnosed with complicated by shock, treated between 2019 2022 at Cardiology Department University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania. Machine models—Random Forest (RF), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA)—were developed tested specifically CICU phases. Model performance was evaluated using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score. Results: In phase, RF QDA achieved highest accuracy, both reaching 87.50%. CICU, demonstrate best performance, ACCs 0.843. maintained consistent across Relevant predictors included strategy, TIMI flow before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Killip class, creatinine, Creatine Kinase Index (CKI)—all parameters routinely assessed patients. These effectively identified post-reperfusion complications hemodynamic decline, supporting decisions regarding extended monitoring ICU-level care. Conclusions: Predictive implemented advanced phases contribute dynamic, phase-specific reassessment optimize resource allocation. findings support integration ML-based tools into post-PCI workflows, enabling earlier decline more efficient deployment resources. When combined earlier-stage models, inclusion forms a end-to-end framework. With further refinement, this system could be as mobile application throughout continuum.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Journal of Clinical Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14(11), С. 3698 - 3698
Опубликована: Май 25, 2025
Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening complication of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and remains the leading cause in-hospital mortality, with rates ranging from 5 to 10% despite advances in reperfusion strategies. Early identification timely intervention are critical for improving outcomes. This study investigates utility machine learning (ML) models predicting risk CS during early phases care—prehospital, emergency department (ED), cardiology-on-call—with focus on accurate triage prioritization urgent angiography. Results: In prehospital phase, Extra Trees classifier demonstrated highest overall performance. It achieved an accuracy (ACC) 0.9062, precision 0.9078, recall F1-score 0.9061, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.8140, indicating both high predictive power strong generalization. ED support vector model outperformed others ACC 78.12%. During cardiology-on-call Random Forest showed best performance 81.25% consistent values across other metrics. Quadratic discriminant analysis generalizable all care stages. Key features included Killip class, ECG rhythm, creatinine, potassium, markers renal dysfunction—parameters readily available routine settings. The greatest clinical was observed phases, where ML could critically ill patients prioritize coronary catheterization, especially important centers limited capacity Conclusions: Machine learning-based offer valuable tool stratification STEMI at cardiogenic shock. These findings implementation ML-driven tools pathways, potentially survival through faster more decision-making, time-sensitive environments.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0European Journal of Radiology Open, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14, С. 100662 - 100662
Опубликована: Май 31, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0