Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
rule
information
and
uses
this
guide
behavioral
stimuli.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
in
which
they
switched
between
two
different
blocks
of
trials:
licking
response
tactile
applied
whisker
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-trial
activity
individual
neurons
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
Variable
rule-dependent
identical
could
principle
occur
via
appropriate
configuration
pre-stimulus
preparatory
states
neural
population,
would
shape
subsequent
response.
We
hypothesized
that
populations
S1,
S2,
MM
ALM
show
were
set
manner
cause
according
current
rule.
This
hypothesis
was
supported
areas
by
findings
(1)
be
decoded
from
population
MM;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
stimulus
during
stimulus-evoked
response;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
within
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
an
action
input
can
cortex.Task
reflected
cortices.Neural
signals
depend
rule.Motor
tracks
switches
is
required
rule-guided
behavior.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 21, 2023
Abstract
Aging
is
accompanied
by
a
decline
of
multiple
cognitive
capacities,
including
working
memory:
the
ability
to
maintain
information
online
for
flexible
control
behavior.
Working
memory
involves
stimulus-selective
neural
activity,
persisting
after
stimulus
presentation
in
widely
distributed
cortical
areas.
Here,
we
unraveled
mechanisms
healthy
older
adults
and
patients
with
mild
impairment
(MCI),
condition
associated
increased
risk
developing
dementia.
We
studied
sample
19
diagnosed
MCI
20
controls
using
combination
model-based
behavioral
psychophysics,
neuropsychological
assessment,
magnetoencephalographic
(MEG)
recordings
brain
activity.
Twenty-one
younger
were
psychophysics
only.
All
subjects
performed
visuo-spatial
delayed-match-to-sample
task
under
systematic
manipulation
temporal
delay
spatial
distance
between
successively
presented
test
stimuli.
developed
computational
model
latent
dynamics
underlying
behavior
fit
this
individual
In
model,
representations
diffused
over
time,
threshold
was
applied
produce
match/non-match
decision
about
locations,
occasional
lapses
produced
random
decisions.
For
participants,
related
parameters
summary
measure
integrity
obtained
from
large
battery,
as
well
MEG
activity
during
interval
task.
all
groups,
accuracy
decreased
duration
sample-test
distance.
When
sample/test
distances
small,
exhibited
larger
false
alarm
rates
than
adults.
The
effects
captured
which
explained
age-related
differences
terms
deterioration
quality
representations,
rather
strategy
(i.e.,
parameter).
Task
governing
stochasticity
(diffusion
noise
lapse
rate
combined)
correlated
overall
group,
but
not
controls.
Individual
rate)
also
interval,
assessed
decoding
signals,
corroborating
their
validity
markers
mechanisms.
Our
findings
provide
insight
into
mechanistic
basis
aging-related
changes
maintenance
reveal
link
MCI.
Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
and
uses
rule
information
guide
behavior.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
where
they
switched
between
two
rules:
licking
in
response
tactile
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
vice
versa.
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-neuron
activity
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
We
hypothesized
that
neural
populations
these
areas
would
show
rule-dependent
preparatory
states,
which
shape
subsequent
This
hypothesis
was
supported
(MM
ALM)
by
findings
(1)
current
could
be
decoded
from
pre-stimulus
population
activity;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
rules;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
of
states
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
action
input
can
occur
via
configuration
cortex.
Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
rule
information
and
uses
this
guide
behavioral
stimuli.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
in
which
they
switched
between
two
different
blocks
of
trials:
licking
response
tactile
applied
whisker
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-trial
activity
individual
neurons
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
Variable
rule-dependent
identical
could
principle
occur
via
appropriate
configuration
pre-stimulus
preparatory
states
neural
population,
would
shape
subsequent
response.
We
hypothesized
that
populations
S1,
S2,
MM
ALM
show
were
set
manner
cause
according
current
rule.
This
hypothesis
was
supported
areas
by
findings
(1)
be
decoded
from
population
MM;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
rules;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
within
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
an
action
input
can
cortex.Task
reflected
cortices.Neural
signals
depend
rule.Motor
tracks
switches
is
required
rule-guided
behavior.
Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
and
uses
rule
information
guide
behavior.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
where
they
switched
between
two
rules:
licking
in
response
tactile
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
vice
versa.
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-neuron
activity
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
We
hypothesized
that
neural
populations
these
areas
would
show
rule-dependent
preparatory
states,
which
shape
subsequent
This
hypothesis
was
supported
(MM
ALM)
by
findings
(1)
current
could
be
decoded
from
pre-stimulus
population
activity;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
rules;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
of
states
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
action
input
can
occur
via
configuration
cortex.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 22, 2023
ABSTRACT
Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
rule
information
and
uses
this
guide
behavioral
stimuli.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
in
which
they
switched
between
two
different
blocks
of
trials:
licking
response
tactile
applied
whisker
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-trial
activity
individual
neurons
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
Variable
rule-dependent
identical
could
principle
occur
via
appropriate
configuration
pre-stimulus
preparatory
states
neural
population,
would
shape
subsequent
response.
We
hypothesized
that
populations
S1,
S2,
MM
ALM
show
were
set
manner
cause
according
current
rule.
This
hypothesis
was
supported
areas
by
findings
(1)
be
decoded
from
population
MM;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
rules;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
within
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
an
action
input
can
cortex.
HIGHLIGHTS
Task
reflected
cortices.
Neural
signals
depend
Motor
tracks
switches
is
required
rule-guided
behavior.
Flexible
responses
to
sensory
stimuli
based
on
changing
rules
are
critical
for
adapting
a
dynamic
environment.
However,
it
remains
unclear
how
the
brain
encodes
rule
information
and
uses
this
guide
behavioral
stimuli.
Here,
we
made
single-unit
recordings
while
head-fixed
mice
performed
cross-modal
selection
task
in
which
they
switched
between
two
different
blocks
of
trials:
licking
response
tactile
applied
whisker
rejecting
visual
stimuli,
or
Along
cortical
sensorimotor
processing
stream
including
primary
(S1)
secondary
(S2)
somatosensory
areas,
medial
(MM)
anterolateral
(ALM)
motor
single-trial
activity
individual
neurons
distinguished
both
prior
stimulus.
Variable
rule-dependent
identical
could
principle
occur
via
appropriate
configuration
pre-stimulus
preparatory
states
neural
population,
would
shape
subsequent
response.
We
hypothesized
that
populations
S1,
S2,
MM
ALM
show
were
set
manner
cause
according
current
rule.
This
hypothesis
was
supported
areas
by
findings
(1)
be
decoded
from
population
MM;
(2)
subspaces
containing
differed
stimulus
during
stimulus-evoked
response;
(3)
optogenetic
disruption
within
impaired
performance.
Our
indicate
flexible
an
action
input
can
cortex.Task
reflected
cortices.Neural
signals
depend
rule.Motor
tracks
switches
is
required
rule-guided
behavior.