Psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report measure and of EMA items assessing the Suicide Crisis Syndrome: Insights on reliability, validity and temporal variability DOI Creative Commons
Lena Spangenberg, Jannis T. Kraiss, Michael Friedrich

и другие.

Psychiatry Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 116504 - 116504

Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025

The present work psychometrically evaluates a brief self-report questionnaire and novel ecological momentary assessment (EMA) items to assess the Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS). Data from n = 220 psychotherapy outpatients (sample 1) 142 psychiatric inpatients after suicide attempt or suicidal crisis 2) are analyzed (cross-sectional, study 1; 21 24 day EMA, 2). Dimensionality is examined by exploratory factor analysis in sample 1 subsequently cross-validated confirmatory (CFA) 2 (self-report questionnaire). Convergent validity determined correlation analysis. multilevel CFA. Temporal instability associations of SCS with affect, context sleep examined. Unidimensionality both measures supported good excellent reliability (α 0.83 1, ϖ 0.91 [self-report questionnaire]; prompt-level 0.94 person-level [EMA]). Correlations convergent validity. fluctuated moderately over time (with 26 % variance being attributable changes on within-person level high heterogeneity between participants) extreme shifts not very likely. EMA appeared be context-sensitive vary according quality valence affective states. reliable tools repeatedly SCS. demonstrates for first that can assessed at moment waxes wanes time.

Язык: Английский

Beliefs about the Uncontrollability of Emotions and Interpersonal Needs as Predictors of Suicide Crisis Syndrome DOI

Colmenero-Navarrete Lidia,

José M. Salguero,

García-Sancho Esperanza

и другие.

Journal of Psychiatric Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 182, С. 312 - 318

Опубликована: Янв. 18, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report measure and of EMA items assessing the Suicide Crisis Syndrome: Insights on reliability, validity and temporal variability DOI Creative Commons
Lena Spangenberg, Jannis T. Kraiss, Michael Friedrich

и другие.

Psychiatry Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 116504 - 116504

Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025

The present work psychometrically evaluates a brief self-report questionnaire and novel ecological momentary assessment (EMA) items to assess the Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS). Data from n = 220 psychotherapy outpatients (sample 1) 142 psychiatric inpatients after suicide attempt or suicidal crisis 2) are analyzed (cross-sectional, study 1; 21 24 day EMA, 2). Dimensionality is examined by exploratory factor analysis in sample 1 subsequently cross-validated confirmatory (CFA) 2 (self-report questionnaire). Convergent validity determined correlation analysis. multilevel CFA. Temporal instability associations of SCS with affect, context sleep examined. Unidimensionality both measures supported good excellent reliability (α 0.83 1, ϖ 0.91 [self-report questionnaire]; prompt-level 0.94 person-level [EMA]). Correlations convergent validity. fluctuated moderately over time (with 26 % variance being attributable changes on within-person level high heterogeneity between participants) extreme shifts not very likely. EMA appeared be context-sensitive vary according quality valence affective states. reliable tools repeatedly SCS. demonstrates for first that can assessed at moment waxes wanes time.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0