Prioritization of Waste-to-Energy Technologies Associated with the Utilization of Food Waste DOI Open Access
Patricia Torres–Lozada, Pablo César Manyoma, Jenny Fabiana Gaviría-Cuevas

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 15(7), С. 5857 - 5857

Опубликована: Март 28, 2023

Taking advantage of the growing production organic waste for its conversion to waste-to-energy (WtE) also contributes mitigating problems associated with final disposal, which is a global trend increasing application. This work presents an innovative approach identification and prioritization WtE alternatives available from use food (FW) present in municipal solid (MSW) Colombian municipality source separation selective collection: (i) systematic literature review, allows one identify alternatives; (ii) prospective MIC-MAC method (Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliqués à un Classement) allowed selection criteria sub criteria; (iii) analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS), ranking selected considering technical, environmental, social aspects. The technologies identified were anaerobic digestion, gasification, incineration, biogas recovery landfills, pyrolysis; this last was excluded due greater application potential substrates such as plastic waste. six sub-criteria prioritized acceptability (36%), greenhouse gas emissions mitigated (16.17%), MSW reduction (15.83%), energy (13.80%), technological maturity (12.95%), electrical efficiency (5.25%), decreasing preferences digestion (78.2%), gasification (47.5%), incineration (27.4%), landfills (6.6%); latter least desirable alternative (lower acceptance CO2 tons relation other options). nature study consideration comprehensive management type large number (120 52 social, 59 technical) validation results through sensitivity analysis, us confirm study, that most favorable technology treatment FW.

Язык: Английский

Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study DOI Open Access

Sandylove Afrane,

Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah, Ephraim Bonah Agyekum

и другие.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 19(14), С. 8428 - 8428

Опубликована: Июль 10, 2022

Energy recovery from waste presents a promising alternative for several countries, including Ghana, which has struggled with unsustainable treatment methods and an inadequate power supply decades. The current study adopts comprehensive multi-criteria decision-making approach the selection of optimal waste-to-energy (WtE) technology implementation in Ghana. Four WtE technologies are evaluated against twelve criteria. An integrated AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method is applied to estimate criteria’s weights rank alternatives. From AHP results, technical criteria obtained highest priority weight, while social emerged as least important process. overall ranking order by fuzzy follows: anaerobic digestion > gasification pyrolysis plasma gasification. sensitivity analysis indicates highly consistent sturdy results regarding selection. This recommends adopting hybrid system technologies, this offers well-balanced under all evaluation compared standalone systems. may help government Ghana other prospective investors select suitable technology, could serve index future research

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

23

Energy processes prediction by a convolutional radial basis function network DOI
José de Jesús Rubio, D.L Quiroz García, Humberto Sossa

и другие.

Energy, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 284, С. 128470 - 128470

Опубликована: Июль 25, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

14

An integrated framework for new sustainable waste-to-energy technology selection and risk assessment: An R-TODIM-R-MULTIMOOSRAL approach DOI

Seyedeh Anahita Mousavi,

Ashkan Hafezalkotob, Vahidreza Ghezavati

и другие.

Journal of Cleaner Production, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 335, С. 130146 - 130146

Опубликована: Дек. 23, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

28

Distributed energy system selection for a commercial building by using Multi Criteria Decision Making methods DOI
Yılmaz Dağtekin, Serkan Kaya, Nurettin Beșlı

и другие.

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 47(86), С. 36672 - 36692

Опубликована: Сен. 15, 2022

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

22

Prioritization of Waste-to-Energy Technologies Associated with the Utilization of Food Waste DOI Open Access
Patricia Torres–Lozada, Pablo César Manyoma, Jenny Fabiana Gaviría-Cuevas

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 15(7), С. 5857 - 5857

Опубликована: Март 28, 2023

Taking advantage of the growing production organic waste for its conversion to waste-to-energy (WtE) also contributes mitigating problems associated with final disposal, which is a global trend increasing application. This work presents an innovative approach identification and prioritization WtE alternatives available from use food (FW) present in municipal solid (MSW) Colombian municipality source separation selective collection: (i) systematic literature review, allows one identify alternatives; (ii) prospective MIC-MAC method (Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliqués à un Classement) allowed selection criteria sub criteria; (iii) analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS), ranking selected considering technical, environmental, social aspects. The technologies identified were anaerobic digestion, gasification, incineration, biogas recovery landfills, pyrolysis; this last was excluded due greater application potential substrates such as plastic waste. six sub-criteria prioritized acceptability (36%), greenhouse gas emissions mitigated (16.17%), MSW reduction (15.83%), energy (13.80%), technological maturity (12.95%), electrical efficiency (5.25%), decreasing preferences digestion (78.2%), gasification (47.5%), incineration (27.4%), landfills (6.6%); latter least desirable alternative (lower acceptance CO2 tons relation other options). nature study consideration comprehensive management type large number (120 52 social, 59 technical) validation results through sensitivity analysis, us confirm study, that most favorable technology treatment FW.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

11