Abstract.
Despite
significant
advancements
in
improving
the
dataset
for
biomass
burning
(BB)
emissions
over
past
few
decades,
uncertainties
persist
BB
aerosol
emissions,
impeding
accurate
assessment
of
simulated
optical
properties
(AOPs)
and
direct
radiative
forcing
(DRF)
during
wildfire
events
global
regional
models.
This
study
assessed
AOPs
(including
depth
(AOD),
absorption
(AAOD),
extinction
coefficients
(AEC))
DRF
using
eight
independent
emission
inventories
applied
to
WRF-Chem
model
period
(March
2019)
Peninsular
Southeast
Asia
(PSEA),
where
were
Global
Fire
Emissions
Database
version
4.1s
(GFED),
INventory
from
NCAR
1.5
(FINN1.5),
Inventory
2.5
MOS
(MODIS
fire
detections,
FINN2.5
MOS),
MOSVIS
(MODIS+VIIRS
MOSVIS),
Assimilation
System
1.2s
(GFAS),
Energetics
Research
1.0
(FEER),
Quick
Dataset
release
1
(QFED),
Integrated
Monitoring
Modelling
Wildland
FIRES
Project
2.0
(IS4FIRES),
respectively.
The
results
show
that
PSEA
region,
organic
carbon
(OC)
differ
by
a
factor
about
9
(0.295–2.533
Tg/M),
with
1.09
±
0.83
Tg/M
coefficient
variation
(CV)
76
%.
High-concentration
OC
occurred
primarily
savanna
agricultural
fires.
GFED
GFAS
are
significantly
lower
than
other
inventories.
VISMOS
approximately
twice
as
high
those
FINN1.5.
Sensitivity
analysis
AOD
different
datasets
indicated
FINN
scenarios
(v1.5
2.5)
overestimate
compared
observation
(VIIRS),
while
underestimate
(HAOD,
AOD>1)
regions
range
97–110°
E,
15–22.5°
N.
Among
schemes,
IS4FIRES
FINN1.5
performed
better
terms
simulation
consistency
bias
HAOD
region
when
AERONET
sites.
AAOD
was
satellite
observations
(TROPOMI)
data,
it
found
schemes
did
not
perform
well
AOD.
overestimation
2.5),
FEER,
largest
MOSVIS.
representing
at
sites
within
region.
always
best
correlation
observations.
AEC
all
trends
consistent
CALIPSO
vertical
direction
(0.5
km
4
km),
demonstrating
efficacy
smoke
plume
rise
used
simulate
heights.
However,
overestimated
AEC,
underestimated
it.
In
aerosols
exhibited
daytime
shortwave
-32.60±24.50
W/m2
surface,
positive
(1.70±1.40
W/m2)
atmosphere,
negative
(-30.89±23.6
top
atmosphere.
Based
on
analysis,
recommended
accurately
assessing
impact
air
quality
climate
Abstract.
Despite
significant
advancements
in
improving
the
dataset
for
biomass
burning
(BB)
emissions
over
past
few
decades,
uncertainties
persist
BB
aerosol
emissions,
impeding
accurate
assessment
of
simulated
optical
properties
(AOPs)
and
direct
radiative
forcing
(DRF)
during
wildfire
events
global
regional
models.
This
study
assessed
AOPs
(including
depth
(AOD),
absorption
(AAOD),
extinction
coefficients
(AEC))
DRF
using
eight
independent
emission
inventories
applied
to
WRF-Chem
model
period
(March
2019)
Peninsular
Southeast
Asia
(PSEA),
where
were
Global
Fire
Emissions
Database
version
4.1s
(GFED),
INventory
from
NCAR
1.5
(FINN1.5),
Inventory
2.5
MOS
(MODIS
fire
detections,
FINN2.5
MOS),
MOSVIS
(MODIS+VIIRS
MOSVIS),
Assimilation
System
1.2s
(GFAS),
Energetics
Research
1.0
(FEER),
Quick
Dataset
release
1
(QFED),
Integrated
Monitoring
Modelling
Wildland
FIRES
Project
2.0
(IS4FIRES),
respectively.
The
results
show
that
PSEA
region,
organic
carbon
(OC)
differ
by
a
factor
about
9
(0.295–2.533
Tg/M),
with
1.09
±
0.83
Tg/M
coefficient
variation
(CV)
76
%.
High-concentration
OC
occurred
primarily
savanna
agricultural
fires.
GFED
GFAS
are
significantly
lower
than
other
inventories.
VISMOS
approximately
twice
as
high
those
FINN1.5.
Sensitivity
analysis
AOD
different
datasets
indicated
FINN
scenarios
(v1.5
2.5)
overestimate
compared
observation
(VIIRS),
while
underestimate
(HAOD,
AOD>1)
regions
range
97–110°
E,
15–22.5°
N.
Among
schemes,
IS4FIRES
FINN1.5
performed
better
terms
simulation
consistency
bias
HAOD
region
when
AERONET
sites.
AAOD
was
satellite
observations
(TROPOMI)
data,
it
found
schemes
did
not
perform
well
AOD.
overestimation
2.5),
FEER,
largest
MOSVIS.
representing
at
sites
within
region.
always
best
correlation
observations.
AEC
all
trends
consistent
CALIPSO
vertical
direction
(0.5
km
4
km),
demonstrating
efficacy
smoke
plume
rise
used
simulate
heights.
However,
overestimated
AEC,
underestimated
it.
In
aerosols
exhibited
daytime
shortwave
-32.60±24.50
W/m2
surface,
positive
(1.70±1.40
W/m2)
atmosphere,
negative
(-30.89±23.6
top
atmosphere.
Based
on
analysis,
recommended
accurately
assessing
impact
air
quality
climate
Abstract.
Despite
significant
advancements
in
improving
the
dataset
for
biomass
burning
(BB)
emissions
over
past
few
decades,
uncertainties
persist
BB
aerosol
emissions,
impeding
accurate
assessment
of
simulated
optical
properties
(AOPs)
and
direct
radiative
forcing
(DRF)
during
wildfire
events
global
regional
models.
This
study
assessed
AOPs
(including
depth
(AOD),
absorption
(AAOD),
extinction
coefficients
(AEC))
DRF
using
eight
independent
emission
inventories
applied
to
WRF-Chem
model
period
(March
2019)
Peninsular
Southeast
Asia
(PSEA),
where
were
Global
Fire
Emissions
Database
version
4.1s
(GFED),
INventory
from
NCAR
1.5
(FINN1.5),
Inventory
2.5
MOS
(MODIS
fire
detections,
FINN2.5
MOS),
MOSVIS
(MODIS+VIIRS
MOSVIS),
Assimilation
System
1.2s
(GFAS),
Energetics
Research
1.0
(FEER),
Quick
Dataset
release
1
(QFED),
Integrated
Monitoring
Modelling
Wildland
FIRES
Project
2.0
(IS4FIRES),
respectively.
The
results
show
that
PSEA
region,
organic
carbon
(OC)
differ
by
a
factor
about
9
(0.295–2.533
Tg/M),
with
1.09
±
0.83
Tg/M
coefficient
variation
(CV)
76
%.
High-concentration
OC
occurred
primarily
savanna
agricultural
fires.
GFED
GFAS
are
significantly
lower
than
other
inventories.
VISMOS
approximately
twice
as
high
those
FINN1.5.
Sensitivity
analysis
AOD
different
datasets
indicated
FINN
scenarios
(v1.5
2.5)
overestimate
compared
observation
(VIIRS),
while
underestimate
(HAOD,
AOD>1)
regions
range
97–110°
E,
15–22.5°
N.
Among
schemes,
IS4FIRES
FINN1.5
performed
better
terms
simulation
consistency
bias
HAOD
region
when
AERONET
sites.
AAOD
was
satellite
observations
(TROPOMI)
data,
it
found
schemes
did
not
perform
well
AOD.
overestimation
2.5),
FEER,
largest
MOSVIS.
representing
at
sites
within
region.
always
best
correlation
observations.
AEC
all
trends
consistent
CALIPSO
vertical
direction
(0.5
km
4
km),
demonstrating
efficacy
smoke
plume
rise
used
simulate
heights.
However,
overestimated
AEC,
underestimated
it.
In
aerosols
exhibited
daytime
shortwave
-32.60±24.50
W/m2
surface,
positive
(1.70±1.40
W/m2)
atmosphere,
negative
(-30.89±23.6
top
atmosphere.
Based
on
analysis,
recommended
accurately
assessing
impact
air
quality
climate