Is the LSTM Model Better than RNN for Flood Forecasting Tasks? A Case Study of HuaYuankou Station and LouDe Station in the Lower Yellow River Basin DOI Open Access
Yiyang Wang, Wenchuan Wang,

Hong-fei Zang

и другие.

Water, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 15(22), С. 3928 - 3928

Опубликована: Ноя. 10, 2023

The long short-term memory network (LSTM) model alleviates the gradient vanishing or exploding problem of recurrent neural (RNN) with gated unit architecture. It has been applied to flood forecasting work. However, data have characteristic unidirectional sequence transmission, and architecture LSTM establishes connections across different time steps which may not capture physical mechanisms be easily interpreted for this kind data. Therefore, paper investigates whether a positive impact is still better than RNN in We establish models, analyze structural differences impacts two models transmitting data, compare their performance also apply hyperparameter optimization attention mechanism coupling techniques improve an optimizing hyperparameters using BOA (BOA-RNN), (BOA-LSTM), MHAM hidden layer (MHAM-RNN), (MHAM-LSTM) Bayesian algorithm (BOA) multi-head (MHAM), respectively, further examine effects as underlying cross-time scale bridging forecasting. use measured process LouDe HuaYuankou stations Yellow River basin evaluate models. results show that compared model, under 1 h forecast period station, same structure improves four indicators Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling-Gupta (KGE), mean absolute error (MAE), root square (RMSE) by 1.72%, 4.43%, 35.52% 25.34%, station significantly. In addition, situations, outperforms most cases. experimental suggest simple internal more suitable work, while methods such match well propagation negative on accuracy. Overall, analyzes from multiple perspectives provides reference subsequent modeling.

Язык: Английский

SHAP values accurately explain the difference in modeling accuracy of convolution neural network between soil full-spectrum and feature-spectrum DOI
Liang Zhong, Guo Xi, Meng Ding

и другие.

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 217, С. 108627 - 108627

Опубликована: Янв. 13, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

21

Interpretability Research of Deep Learning: A Literature Survey DOI

Biao Xu,

Guanci Yang

Information Fusion, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 115, С. 102721 - 102721

Опубликована: Окт. 9, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

17

A transportation Revitalization index prediction model based on Spatial-Temporal attention mechanism DOI
Zhiqiang Lv, Zhaobin Ma,

Fengqian Xia

и другие.

Advanced Engineering Informatics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 61, С. 102519 - 102519

Опубликована: Апрель 3, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

14

Incorporating historical information into the multi-type ant colony optimization model to optimize patch-level land use allocation DOI

Zhaomin Tong,

Yaolin Liu, Ziyi Zhang

и другие.

Sustainable Cities and Society, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 106, С. 105404 - 105404

Опубликована: Апрель 2, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7

An assessment of global land susceptibility to wind erosion based on deep-active learning modelling and interpretation techniques DOI Creative Commons
Hamid Gholami,

Aliakbar Mohammadifar,

Yougui Song

и другие.

Scientific Reports, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(1)

Опубликована: Авг. 15, 2024

Spatial accurate mapping of land susceptibility to wind erosion is necessary mitigate its destructive consequences. In this research, for the first time, we developed a novel methodology based on deep learning (DL) and active (AL) models, their combination (e.g., recurrent neural network (RNN), RNN-AL, gated units (GRU), GRU-AL) three interpretation techniques synergy matrix, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) decision plot, accumulated local effects (ALE) plot) map global erosion. respect, 13 variables were explored as controlling factors erosion, eight them speed, topsoil carbon content, clay elevation, gravel fragment, precipitation, sand content soil moisture) selected important via Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) feature selection algorithm. The four models applied performance was assessed by measures consisting area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, cumulative gain Kolmogorov Smirnov (KS) statistic plots. results revealed that GRU-AL model considered most accurate, revealing 38.5%, 12.6%, 10.3%, 12.5% 26.1% lands are grouped at very low, moderate, high classes hazard, respectively. Interpretation interpret contribution impact input model's output. Synergy plot exhibited with DEM moisture predictions. ALE showed precipitation had negative feedback prediction Based SHAP presented highest Results highlighted new regions latitudes (southern Greenland coast, hotspots in Alaska Siberia), which

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7

An interpretable deep learning model to map land subsidence hazard DOI

Paria Rahmani,

Hamid Gholami, Shahram Golzari

и другие.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 31(11), С. 17448 - 17460

Опубликована: Фев. 10, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Desertification in northern China from 2000 to 2020: The spatial–temporal processes and driving mechanisms DOI Creative Commons
Junfang Wang, Yuan Wang, Duanyang Xu

и другие.

Ecological Informatics, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 82, С. 102769 - 102769

Опубликована: Авг. 11, 2024

Desertification is one of the most significant environmental and social challenges globally. Monitoring desertification dynamics quantitatively identifying contributions its driving factors are crucial for land restoration sustainable development. This study develops a standardized methodological framework that combines with mechanisms at pixel level, applied to northern China from 2000 2020. Using multisource data employing Time Series Segmentation Residual Trend analysis (TSS-RESTREND) method alongside geographical detector, we assessed reversion, expansion, abrupt change processes, along impacts interactions natural human were assessed. Over past two decades, proportion desertified decreased by 5.60%. Notably, 32.88% area experienced while only 5.86% underwent expansion. Abrupt changes in both reversed expanding areas observed, primarily central western regions, these concentrated periods 2009–2011 2014–2016. The various different sub-regions exhibited spatial heterogeneity. Increased precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration contributed reversion area, wind speed influenced eastern area. Additionally, population density afforestation activities also promoted reversion. In contrast, precipitation increased temperature expansion areas, respectively, exacerbating this process. Overall, between enhanced. Future control ecological engineering planning should focus on coupling effects relevant vegetation changes.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

6

Intrinsic and extrinsic techniques for quantification uncertainty of an interpretable GRU deep learning model used to predict atmospheric total suspended particulates (TSP) in Zabol, Iran during the dusty period of 120-days wind DOI
Hamid Gholami,

Aliakbar Mohammadifar,

Reza Dahmardeh Behrooz

и другие.

Environmental Pollution, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 342, С. 123082 - 123082

Опубликована: Дек. 5, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

14

An explainable integrated machine learning model for mapping soil erosion by wind and water in a catchment with three desiccated lakes DOI
Hamid Gholami,

Mehdi Jalali,

Marzieh Rezaei

и другие.

Aeolian Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 67-69, С. 100924 - 100924

Опубликована: Апрель 27, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5

Using an interpretable deep learning model for the prediction of riverine suspended sediment load DOI

Zeinab Mohammadi-Raigani,

Hamid Gholami,

Aliakbar Mohamadifar

и другие.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 31(22), С. 32480 - 32493

Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4