Journal of Professions and Organization,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
7(1), С. 27 - 46
Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2020
Abstract
What
will
happen
to
law
firms
and
the
legal
profession
when
use
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
becomes
prevalent
in
services?
We
address
this
question
by
considering
three
related
levels
analysis:
tasks,
business
models,
organizations.
First,
we
review
AI’s
technical
capabilities
relation
identify
contexts
where
it
is
likely
replace
or
augment
humans.
AI
capable
doing
some,
but
not
all,
tasks
better
than
lawyers
augmented
multidisciplinary
human
inputs.
Second,
new
models
for
creating
value
services
applying
AI.
These
differ
from
firms’
traditional
advisory
model,
because
they
require
technological
(non-human)
assets
Third,
analyze
organizational
structure
that
complements
old
models:
professional
partnership
(P2)
well-adapted
delivering
centralized
management,
access
outside
capital,
employee
incentives
offered
corporate
form
appear
complement
AI-enabled
models.
Some
are
experimenting
with
pursuing
parallel.
However,
differences
create
conflicts
combined.
partially
externalized
via
contracting
segregated
realigned
vertical
integration.
Our
analysis
suggests
firm
experimentation
aligning
different
distinct
entities,
along
ethical
concerns,
affect
extent
which
become
‘hybrid
professionals’.
Journal of Professions and Organization,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
2(2), С. 187 - 206
Опубликована: Июнь 25, 2015
It
is
tempting
to
stick
traditional,
‘pure’
images
of
professionalism—as
the
protected
treatment
complex
cases—and
resist
‘alien’
intrusions,
especially
managerial
‘encroachments’.
However,
it
has
become
rather
normal
link
professionalism
well-managed
organizational
surroundings
and
focus
on
emerging
hybrid
professional
practices
in
which
work
(re)organized
one
way
or
other.
Contradictory
principles
such
as
autonomy
control,
quality
efficiency,
are
combined
order
establish
contemporary
actions.
This
article
analyses
hybridization
public
domains,
accomplish
three
things.
First,
we
show
what
about
types
identified.
Second,
importance
hybridization,
against
background
(changing)
societal
contexts.
Third,
move
beyond
discuss
‘organizing
professionalism’
a
new
model
professionalism.
Organizing
becomes
part
work—instead
an
hybrid,
‘uneasy’
combination
principles.
Public Administration,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
93(2), С. 412 - 432
Опубликована: Янв. 23, 2015
We
examine
the
‘identity
work’
of
manager–professional
‘hybrids’,
specifically
medical
professionals
in
managerial
roles
British
National
Health
Service,
to
maintain
and
hybridize
their
professional
identity
wider
professionalism
organizational
policy
contexts
affected
by
managerialist
ideas.
Empirically,
we
differentiate
between
‘incidental
hybrids’,
who
represent
protect
traditional
institutionalized
while
temporarily
hybrid
roles,
‘willing
developed
professional–managerial
identities
during
formative
work
or
later
reaction
potential
violations.
Questions
about
willing
hybrids'
led
them
challenge
disrupt
professionalism,
use
integrate
managerialism,
creating
more
legitimate
context.
By
aligning
with
personal
identity,
regulating
auditing
other
professionals,
hybrids
also
position
collectively
as
elite
within
profession.
Public Administration,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
93(2), С. 273 - 289
Опубликована: Май 7, 2015
This
article
explores
and
extends
the
concept
of
hybridity
to
understand
current
changes
in
public
services
organizations,
notably
as
seen
from
an
organizational
studies
perspective.
The
notion
has
become
more
important,
given
that
sector
increasingly
blurs
with
other
sectors
social
actors.
Previous
reliance
on
use
ideal‐types
characterizing
reforms
masked
expanding
heterogeneity.
We
here
move
beyond
(i)
conventional
focus
structural
consider
(ii)
institutional
dynamics,
(iii)
interactions,
(iv)
new
identities
roles
services.
Based
these
four
dimensions
hybridity,
we
review
alternative
theoretical
frameworks.
suggest
bringing
together
work
neighbouring
disciplines
administration
organization
may
improve
our
understanding
outline
a
future
research
agenda.
Sociology of Health & Illness,
Год журнала:
2011,
Номер
34(4), С. 626 - 644
Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2011
Abstract
In
the
last
three
decades,
medical
doctors
have
increasingly
been
exposed
to
management
control
measures.
This
phenomenon
has
reflected
in
a
number
of
studies
various
disciplines,
including
sociology,
organisation
studies,
management,
and
health
service
research.
article
seeks
provide
comprehensive
overview
dealing
with
impact
on
professional
control.
particular,
it
bridge
diversity
assumptions,
theoretical
perspectives
conceptual
underpinnings
at
play,
by
exploring
synergies
between
them
opening
up
new
horizons
for
The
review
shows
how
relationship
clinicians
analysed
an
organisational
level
using
two
interconnected
analytical
frameworks
focusing
sociocultural
task‐related
dimensions
professionalism.
final
discussion,
we
argue
that
comparative,
longitudinal
cross‐sectional
research
is
necessary,
there
need
overcome
hegemony/resistance
framework
current
analyses
Such
approach
would
contribute
revision
macro
theories
professionalism
stimulate
emerging
examining
different
towards
specialisations.
might
also
discussion
professionals’
relationships
members
other
groups,
nurses
healthcare
managers.
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
33(1), С. 256 - 280
Опубликована: Июнь 5, 2019
Purpose
The
purpose
of
this
paper
is
to
synthesize
insights
from
previous
accounting,
performance
measurement
(PM)
and
accountability
research
into
the
rapidly
emerging
field
knowledge-intensive
public
organizations
(KIPOs).
In
so
doing,
it
draws
upon
literature
other
papers
included
in
special
issue
Accounting,
Auditing
Accountability
Journal
.
Design/methodology/approach
reviews
academic
analysis
provided
on
PM
changes
KIPOs,
such
as
universities
healthcare
organizations,
paves
way
for
future
area.
Findings
review
shows
that
a
growing
number
studies
are
focusing
hybridization
different
not
only
terms
accounting
tools
(e.g.
indicators,
budgeting
reporting)
but
also
relation
individual
actors
professionals
managers)
may
have
divergent
values
thus
act
according
multiple
logics.
It
highlights
many
areas
which
further
robust
needed
guide
developments
hybrid
policy
practice.
Research
limitations/implications
This
provides
academics,
regulators
decision
makers
with
relevant
issues
aspects
need
theoretical
development
empirical
evidence
help
inform
improvements
Originality/value
researchers
area
agenda
they
can
build
their
research.