History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
46(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 12, 2024
Abstract
This
paper
addresses
the
topic
of
determinism
in
contemporary
microbiome
research.
I
distinguish
two
types
deterministic
claims
about
microbiome,
and
show
evidence
that
both
are
present
literature.
First,
idea
host
genetics
determines
composition
which
call
“host-microbiome
determinism”.
Second,
holobiont
(the
individual
unit
composed
by
a
plus
its
microbiome)
expression
certain
phenotypic
traits,
“microbiome-phenotype
Drawing
on
stability
traits
conception
individuality
(Suárez
Hist
Philos
Life
Sci
42:11,
2020)
argue
none
these
hypotheses
is
grounded
our
current
knowledge
how
transgenerationally
assembled,
nor
it
expresses
traits.
The
intersection
of
development
and
evolution
has
always
harbored
conceptual
issues,
but
many
these
are
on
display
in
contemporary
evolutionary
developmental
biology
(evo-devo).
These
issues
include:
(1)
the
precise
constitution
evo-devo,
with
its
focus
both
basis
evolution,
how
it
fits
within
theory;
(2)
nature
evo-devo
model
systems
that
comprise
material
comparative
experimental
research;
(3)
puzzle
to
understand
widely
used
notion
'conserved
mechanisms';
(4)
definition
novelties
expectations
for
explain
them;
(5)
demand
interdisciplinary
collaboration
derives
from
investigating
complex
phenomena
at
key
moments
history
life,
such
as
fin-limb
transition.
This
Element
treats
close
attention
empirical
detail
scientific
practice
offer
new
perspectives
development.
title
is
also
available
Open
Access
Cambridge
Core.
Physarum
polycephalum,
also
known
more
colloquially
as
'the
blob',
'acellular
slime
mould',
or
just
'slime
is
a
unicellular
multinucleate
protist
that
has
continued
to
attract
the
interest
of
biologists
over
past
century
because
its
complex
life
cycle,
unique
physiology,
morphology,
and
behaviour.
More
recently,
attention
shifted
model
organism
for
investigating
putative
cognitive
capacities
such
decision
making,
learning,
memory
in
organisms
without
nervous
systems.
The
aim
this
Element
illustrate
how
can
be
used
valuable
tool
approaching
various
topics
philosophy
biology.
behaviour
not
only
pose
challenge
some
received
views
biological
processes
but
also,
I
shall
argue,
provide
an
opportunity
clarify
appropriately
sharpen
concepts
underlying
views.
The
crucial
role
of
animal
models
in
biomedical
research
calls
for
philosophical
investigation
how
and
whether
knowledge
about
human
diseases
can
be
gained
by
studying
other
species.
This
Element
delves
into
the
selection
construction
to
serve
as
preclinical
substitutes
patients.
It
explores
multifaceted
roles
fulfil
translational
boundaries
between
humans
animals
are
negotiated
this
process.
book
also
covers
persistent
challenges
that
have
sparked
debates
across
scientific,
philosophical,
public
arenas
regarding
limitations
future
models.
Among
tensions
standardization
variation
medicine,
well
strategies
aiming
reduce
recapitulate
biological
complexity.
Finally,
examines
prospects
replacing
with
animal-free
methods.
demonstrates
why
modeling
should
interest
philosophers,
social
scientists,
scientists
alike.
The
biological
world
is
full
of
phenomena
that
seem
to
run
counter
Darwin's
insight
natural
selection
can
lead
the
appearance
design.
For
instance,
why
do
organisms
in
some
species
divide
reproductive
labor?
existence
non-reproducing
such
'eusocial'
looks
be
at
odds
with
an
evolutionary
theory
which
posits
traits
exist
because
they
help
survive
and
reproduce.
What
advantage
insect
being
distasteful
its
predators?
distastefulness
appears
designed
deter
predators,
but
only
affect
predator's
actions
when
eaten;
it
hard
see
how
a
trait
could
passed
on.
This
Element
will
cover
shared
foundations
explanations
for
these
other
seemingly
puzzling
phenomena,
focusing
on
concepts
inclusive
fitness
kin
selection.
Time
is
ripe
to
complement
the
question
'what
health
and
disease?'
in
philosophy
of
medicine
with
a
'philosophy
physiology.'
Indeed,
actors
this
debate
share
conviction
that
'foundational'
concept
dictates
scientific
field
what
be
considered
healthy
or
pathological
leaves
it
explore
only
facts
mechanisms.
Rejecting
presupposition,
physiology
accepts
biomedical
sciences
redefine
their
own
object:
healthy,
pathological.
various
theories
disease
health,
philosophers
have
rarely
studied,
form
core
research,
too
hastily
as
science
'without
theories.'
The
Element
identifies
them,
clarifies
content,
presuppositions,
scope.
Finally,
proposes
new
about
unity
phenomenon:
not
do
all
diseases
common?'
but
rather,
'why
susceptibility
universal
necessary
characteristic
living
beings?'
This
Element
introduces
the
Disambiguating
Project
(DP)
about
units
of
selection.
By
DP,
authors
mean
thesis
that
expression
'units
selection'
refers
to
at
least
three
non-co-extensional
functional
concepts:
interactor,
replicator/reproducer/reconstitutor,
and
manifestor
adaptation/type-1
agent.
They
present
each
concept
demonstrate
necessity
their
isolation,
because
them
responds
a
distinct
question
selection,
these
questions
are
not
always
posed
in
combination
today's
biological
research.
further
apply
framework
analysis
debates
concerning
Evolutionary
Transitions
Individuality
(ETI)
argue
DP
interprets
ETI
better
than
any
project
rejecting
meanings
selection.'
Thus,
they
claim
differentiation
between
concepts
is
fundamental
clarify
some
conceptual
confusions
biology,
which
rest
on
conflation
meanings.
Humans
learn
in
ways
that
are
influenced
by
others.
As
a
result,
cultural
items
of
many
types
elaborated
over
time
build
on
the
achievements
previous
generations.
Culture
therefore
shows
pattern
descent
with
modification
reminiscent
Darwinian
evolution.
This
raises
question
whether
selection-a
mechanism
akin
to
natural
selection,
albeit
working
when
learned
passed
from
demonstrators
observers-can
explain
how
various
practices
refined
time.
Element
argues
selection
is
not
necessary
for
explanation
adaptation;
it
hybrid
explanations
draw
aspects
and
attraction
theory;
reproduction
makes
problems
highly
formalised
approaches
selection;
uses
case-study
demonstrate
importance
human
agency
cumulative
adaptation.
This
Element
examines
philosophical
accounts
of
scientific
explanation,
particularly
those
that
apply
to
biology
and
the
life
sciences.
Two
main
categories
explanation
are
examined
in
detail
–causal
explanations
non-causal
explanations.
The
first
section
this
provides
a
brief
history
some
basics
on
explanation.
Section
2
covers
causal
by
discussing
foundational
topics
area,
such
as
defining
causation,
selection,
reductive
is
followed
an
examination
distinct
types
including
appeal
mechanisms
pathways,
cascades.
third
non-causal,
mathematical
explanations,
which
have
received
significant
attention
philosophy
Three
discussed:
topological
constraint-based
optimality
efficiency
minimal
model
title
also
available
Open
Access
Cambridge
Core.
Summary
When
thinking
about
evolutionary
change,
many
practicing
biologists
will
focus
on
changes
in
allele
frequencies
over
time.
This
gene‐centric
view
of
evolution
has
strongly
impacted
how
(and
biological
science
general)
is
thought,
taught,
and
funded.
In
this
viewpoint,
we
join
recent
criticisms
the
call
for
reinstalling
a
phenotypic
evolution.
The
assumptions
view—enormous/nonstructured
populations
totally
random
interactions
between
genes,
individuals,
environments—are
hard
to
imagine
real
world.
A
gene's
effects
phenotype
fitness
depend
its
with
other
genes
(epistasis),
microbiome,
environment,
it
generations,
populations,
environments.
Incorrectly,
have
been
given
an
agency
role
natural
selection
that
they
do
not
possess:
replicate,
but
variation
or
differential
proliferation
through
their
traits
(these
are
characteristics
units
deemed
‘interactors’).
Here,
show
necessary
capture
several
widespread
phenomena:
epistasis,
nongenetic
inheritance,
multilevel
selection,
niche
construction
plant–soil
feedbacks,
all
which
vast
empirical
evidence.
Life
marvelous,
complex,
certainly
more
than
machinery
genetic
information.