Community advisory boards as implementation strategies to center partner and patient voice in community health centers DOI Creative Commons
Rebekka M. Lee,

Kamini Mallick,

James G. Daly

и другие.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 9(1)

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024

Community advisory boards (CABs) are a promising approach for strengthening patient and partner voices in community health center (CHC) evidence-based decision-making. This paper aims to describe how CHCs used CABs during the COVID-19 pandemic improve reach of testing among populations experiencing disparities identify transferable lessons future implementation. mixed methods study integrates brief quantitative surveys engagement (N = 20) one-on-one qualitative interviews 13) staff partners engaged CHC with cost analysis feedback from participating an online learning 17). reported high ratings engagement, all mean principles above 4 ("very good" or "often") out 5. Qualitative findings provided more in-depth understanding experiences serving on CAB highlighted such as trust mutual respect were reflected practices. We developed toolkit strategies governance prioritization, estimates ensure sustainment, guidance integrating quality improvement expertise, testimonies members benefits joining, template agendas facilitator training meeting success. In alignment Translational Science Benefits Model, this expands research impact through comprehensive measurement by transforming into action-orientated guide implement decision-making public impact.

Язык: Английский

Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges DOI Creative Commons

Ayan A Yusuf,

Victoria Hatfield,

Katherine Francombe Pridham

и другие.

Research Involvement and Engagement, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 11(1)

Опубликована: Май 15, 2025

Abstract The involvement of communities with a stake in healthcare research is often limited, and attempts to increase their participation create shared decision-making partnerships are hindered by structural barriers. In this paper, we describe the design implementation Community Expert Group comprised people lived expertise homelessness at an academic health center. We detail group’s model, guiding principles, governance structure, activities, discuss institutional challenges encountered over course partnership. report that lack policies practices institutions support long-term collaboration community experts makes it challenging define scope role, requiring individual teams fill gap.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Community advisory boards as implementation strategies to center partner and patient voice in community health centers DOI Creative Commons
Rebekka M. Lee,

Kamini Mallick,

James G. Daly

и другие.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 9(1)

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024

Community advisory boards (CABs) are a promising approach for strengthening patient and partner voices in community health center (CHC) evidence-based decision-making. This paper aims to describe how CHCs used CABs during the COVID-19 pandemic improve reach of testing among populations experiencing disparities identify transferable lessons future implementation. mixed methods study integrates brief quantitative surveys engagement (N = 20) one-on-one qualitative interviews 13) staff partners engaged CHC with cost analysis feedback from participating an online learning 17). reported high ratings engagement, all mean principles above 4 ("very good" or "often") out 5. Qualitative findings provided more in-depth understanding experiences serving on CAB highlighted such as trust mutual respect were reflected practices. We developed toolkit strategies governance prioritization, estimates ensure sustainment, guidance integrating quality improvement expertise, testimonies members benefits joining, template agendas facilitator training meeting success. In alignment Translational Science Benefits Model, this expands research impact through comprehensive measurement by transforming into action-orientated guide implement decision-making public impact.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2