Quantitative Synthesis of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Vaccine Hesitancy in 185 Countries DOI Creative Commons
Jerome Nyhalah Dinga, Severin Kabakama, Dieudonné Lemuh Njimoh

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 12(1), С. 34 - 34

Опубликована: Дек. 28, 2023

Mass vaccination against COVID-19 is the best method to ensure herd immunity in order curb effect of pandemic on global economy. It therefore important assess determinants vaccine acceptance and hesitancy a scale. Factors were recorded from cross-sectional studies analyzed with t-Test, ANOVA, correlation, meta-regression analyses synthesized identify trends inform policy. We registered protocol (ID: CRD42022350418) used standard Cochrane methods PRISMA guidelines collect synthesize articles published between January 2020 August 2023. A total 67 576 185 countries involving 3081,766 participants included this synthesis. Global was 65.27% (95% CI; 62.72–67.84%), while stood at 32.1% 29.05–35.17%). One-Way ANOVA showed that there no significant difference percentage Gross Domestic Product spent procurement across World Bank income levels (p < 0.187). There 0.001) 0.005) different Income levels. level had strong influence 0.0004) 0.003) but did not. correlation (r = −0.11, p 0.164) or −0.09, 0.234). Meta-regression analysis living an urban setting (OR 4.83, 95% 0.67–212.8), rural 2.53, 0.29–119.33), older 1.98, 0.99–4.07), higher education 1.76, 0.85–3.81), being low earner 2.85, 0.45–30.63) increased odds high acceptance. influenza 33.06, 5.03–1395.01), mistrust for vaccines 3.91, 1.92–8.24), complacency 2.86, 1.02–8.83), pregnancy 2.3, 0.12–141.76), taking traditional herbs 2.15, 0.52–10.42), female 1.53, 0.78–3.01), safety concerns 1.29, 0.67–2.51). proposed number recommendations increase COVID-19.

Язык: Английский

Attitude to RSV Vaccination Among a Cohort of Pregnant Women in Jordan: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Study DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam, Tleen Kherfan, Amwaj Al‐Farajat

и другие.

Health Science Reports, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 8(1)

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025

ABSTRACT Background and Aims The recently approved maternal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can reduce its burden among infants. However, vaccine hesitancy/resistance undermine the beneficial impact of RSV vaccination. aim this study was to assess willingness pregnant women in Jordan receive associated determinants. Methods Face‐to‐face interviews were conducted obstetrics/gynecology clinics Central, Northern, Southern regions during January–February 2024, using a convenience sampling approach. Attitude assessed previously validated ABCDEF scale. Results A total 404 participated with mean age 30.1 ± 6.2 years. majority participants showed ( n = 313, 77.5%), hesitancy 25 (6.2%), resistance 66 (16.3%). Variables that significantly higher acceptance multivariate analysis were: < 30 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.45, p 0.010), undergraduates (aOR: 3.27, 0.026), being healthcare worker 4.50, 0.036), history previous COVID‐19/influenza uptake 2.47, 0.045). Two out six constructs acceptance, namely “Advice” construct 10.38, 0.001) “Fear” 21.49, 0.001). Conclusion This highlighted complex nature attitude towards women. role demographic variables, prior experience, trust credible health institutions safety, fear disease consequences infants shaping Addressing these factors help effectively promote women, subsequently helping protect from significant burden.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
Attitude to RSV Vaccination among a Cohort of Pregnant Women in Jordan DOI Open Access
Malik Sallam, Tleen Kherfan, Amwaj Al‐Farajat

и другие.

Опубликована: Июль 15, 2024

The recently approved maternal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can reduce its burden among infants. Vaccine hesitancy/resistance undermine the beneficial impact of RSV vaccination. aim this study was to assess willingness pregnant women in Jordan receive and associated determinants. Face-to-face interviews were conducted obstetrics/gynecology clinics during January-February 2024, with convenience sampling. Attitude assessed using previously validated ABCDEF scale. A total 404 participated a mean age 30 years. majority participants showed (n=313, 77.5%), hesitancy 25 (6.2%), resistance 66 (16.3%). Variables that signifi-cantly higher vaccine acceptance multivariate analysis were:

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3
Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination intentions and the moderating effect of perceived behavioral control among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study applying the revised Theory of Planned Behavior DOI

So Youn Kim,

Hee Sun Kang, Mijong Kim

и другие.

Women s Health Nursing, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 31(1), С. 34 - 45

Опубликована: Март 28, 2025

Purpose: This study explored factors that influence coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination intentions during pregnancy and examined the moderating effect of perceived behavioral control based on revised Theory Planned Behavior.Methods: cross-sectional online survey recruited 227 Korean pregnant women from an community. Data were collected December 2021 to January 2022 analyzed using independent t-test, analysis variance, Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis. The PROCESS macro (model 1) simple slope used investigate behavior control.Results: Attitudes (β=.44, p<.001) subjective norms (β=.36, identified as influencing COVID-19 pregnancy. In final model, total explanatory power variables was 44% (F=90.47, p<.001). in relationship between attitudes intention not statistically significant (B=0.07, p=.382). However, it showed a (B=0.06, p=.046). For analysis, classified into three levels (low, moderate, high), analyzed. Pregnant with high level strongest (b=0.45, p<.001), indicating control.Conclusion: To increase among women, is imperative implement programs focus improving women’s attitudes, norms, toward vaccination, particular attention those low control.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA DOI
Comfort Z. Olorunsaiye, Hannah M. Degge, Augustus Osborne

и другие.

Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Апрель 29, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Menstrual disturbance associated with COVID-19 vaccines: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis DOI Creative Commons
Kunchok Dorjee, Rachel Sadoff, Farima Rahimi Mansour

и другие.

PLoS ONE, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 20(5), С. e0320162 - e0320162

Опубликована: Май 16, 2025

The relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and menstrual disturbance is unclear, in part because researchers have measured different outcomes (e.g., delays vs. changes to cycle length) with various study designs. Menstrual disruption could be a decisive factor people's willingness accept the vaccine. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science for studies investigating length, flow volume, post-menopausal bleeding, unexpected or intermenstrual bleeding. Data were analyzed using fixed-effects meta-analysis Shore's adjusted confidence intervals heterogeneity. Seventeen >1·9 million participants analyzed. found 19% greater risk increase length as compared unvaccinated people pre-vaccination time-periods (summary relative (sRR): 1·19; 95% CI: 1·11-1·26; n = 23,718 participants). was same Pfizer-BioNTech (sRR: 1·15; 1·05-1·27; 16,595) Moderna 1·05-1·25; 7,523), similar AstraZeneca 1·27; 1·02-1·59; 532), higher Janssen 1·69; 1·14-2·52; 751) In first after vaccination, increased by

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Quantitative Synthesis of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Vaccine Hesitancy in 185 Countries DOI Creative Commons
Jerome Nyhalah Dinga, Severin Kabakama, Dieudonné Lemuh Njimoh

и другие.

Vaccines, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 12(1), С. 34 - 34

Опубликована: Дек. 28, 2023

Mass vaccination against COVID-19 is the best method to ensure herd immunity in order curb effect of pandemic on global economy. It therefore important assess determinants vaccine acceptance and hesitancy a scale. Factors were recorded from cross-sectional studies analyzed with t-Test, ANOVA, correlation, meta-regression analyses synthesized identify trends inform policy. We registered protocol (ID: CRD42022350418) used standard Cochrane methods PRISMA guidelines collect synthesize articles published between January 2020 August 2023. A total 67 576 185 countries involving 3081,766 participants included this synthesis. Global was 65.27% (95% CI; 62.72–67.84%), while stood at 32.1% 29.05–35.17%). One-Way ANOVA showed that there no significant difference percentage Gross Domestic Product spent procurement across World Bank income levels (p < 0.187). There 0.001) 0.005) different Income levels. level had strong influence 0.0004) 0.003) but did not. correlation (r = −0.11, p 0.164) or −0.09, 0.234). Meta-regression analysis living an urban setting (OR 4.83, 95% 0.67–212.8), rural 2.53, 0.29–119.33), older 1.98, 0.99–4.07), higher education 1.76, 0.85–3.81), being low earner 2.85, 0.45–30.63) increased odds high acceptance. influenza 33.06, 5.03–1395.01), mistrust for vaccines 3.91, 1.92–8.24), complacency 2.86, 1.02–8.83), pregnancy 2.3, 0.12–141.76), taking traditional herbs 2.15, 0.52–10.42), female 1.53, 0.78–3.01), safety concerns 1.29, 0.67–2.51). proposed number recommendations increase COVID-19.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

8