Attitude to RSV Vaccination Among a Cohort of Pregnant Women in Jordan: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Study
Health Science Reports,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
8(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Background
and
Aims
The
recently
approved
maternal
vaccination
against
respiratory
syncytial
virus
(RSV)
can
reduce
its
burden
among
infants.
However,
vaccine
hesitancy/resistance
undermine
the
beneficial
impact
of
RSV
vaccination.
aim
this
study
was
to
assess
willingness
pregnant
women
in
Jordan
receive
associated
determinants.
Methods
Face‐to‐face
interviews
were
conducted
obstetrics/gynecology
clinics
Central,
Northern,
Southern
regions
during
January–February
2024,
using
a
convenience
sampling
approach.
Attitude
assessed
previously
validated
ABCDEF
scale.
Results
A
total
404
participated
with
mean
age
30.1
±
6.2
years.
majority
participants
showed
(
n
=
313,
77.5%),
hesitancy
25
(6.2%),
resistance
66
(16.3%).
Variables
that
significantly
higher
acceptance
multivariate
analysis
were:
<
30
years
(adjusted
odds
ratio
(aOR):
2.45,
p
0.010),
undergraduates
(aOR:
3.27,
0.026),
being
healthcare
worker
4.50,
0.036),
history
previous
COVID‐19/influenza
uptake
2.47,
0.045).
Two
out
six
constructs
acceptance,
namely
“Advice”
construct
10.38,
0.001)
“Fear”
21.49,
0.001).
Conclusion
This
highlighted
complex
nature
attitude
towards
women.
role
demographic
variables,
prior
experience,
trust
credible
health
institutions
safety,
fear
disease
consequences
infants
shaping
Addressing
these
factors
help
effectively
promote
women,
subsequently
helping
protect
from
significant
burden.
Язык: Английский
Attitude to RSV Vaccination among a Cohort of Pregnant Women in Jordan
Опубликована: Июль 15, 2024
The
recently
approved
maternal
vaccination
against
respiratory
syncytial
virus
(RSV)
can
reduce
its
burden
among
infants.
Vaccine
hesitancy/resistance
undermine
the
beneficial
impact
of
RSV
vaccination.
aim
this
study
was
to
assess
willingness
pregnant
women
in
Jordan
receive
and
associated
determinants.
Face-to-face
interviews
were
conducted
obstetrics/gynecology
clinics
during
January-February
2024,
with
convenience
sampling.
Attitude
assessed
using
previously
validated
ABCDEF
scale.
A
total
404
participated
a
mean
age
30
years.
majority
participants
showed
(n=313,
77.5%),
hesitancy
25
(6.2%),
resistance
66
(16.3%).
Variables
that
signifi-cantly
higher
vaccine
acceptance
multivariate
analysis
were:
Язык: Английский
Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination intentions and the moderating effect of perceived behavioral control among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study applying the revised Theory of Planned Behavior
Women s Health Nursing,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
31(1), С. 34 - 45
Опубликована: Март 28, 2025
Purpose:
This
study
explored
factors
that
influence
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
vaccination
intentions
during
pregnancy
and
examined
the
moderating
effect
of
perceived
behavioral
control
based
on
revised
Theory
Planned
Behavior.Methods:
cross-sectional
online
survey
recruited
227
Korean
pregnant
women
from
an
community.
Data
were
collected
December
2021
to
January
2022
analyzed
using
independent
t-test,
analysis
variance,
Pearson
correlation
coefficients,
multiple
regression
analysis.
The
PROCESS
macro
(model
1)
simple
slope
used
investigate
behavior
control.Results:
Attitudes
(β=.44,
p<.001)
subjective
norms
(β=.36,
identified
as
influencing
COVID-19
pregnancy.
In
final
model,
total
explanatory
power
variables
was
44%
(F=90.47,
p<.001).
in
relationship
between
attitudes
intention
not
statistically
significant
(B=0.07,
p=.382).
However,
it
showed
a
(B=0.06,
p=.046).
For
analysis,
classified
into
three
levels
(low,
moderate,
high),
analyzed.
Pregnant
with
high
level
strongest
(b=0.45,
p<.001),
indicating
control.Conclusion:
To
increase
among
women,
is
imperative
implement
programs
focus
improving
women’s
attitudes,
norms,
toward
vaccination,
particular
attention
those
low
control.
Язык: Английский
COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 29, 2025
Язык: Английский
Menstrual disturbance associated with COVID-19 vaccines: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
20(5), С. e0320162 - e0320162
Опубликована: Май 16, 2025
The
relationship
between
COVID-19
vaccines
and
menstrual
disturbance
is
unclear,
in
part
because
researchers
have
measured
different
outcomes
(e.g.,
delays
vs.
changes
to
cycle
length)
with
various
study
designs.
Menstrual
disruption
could
be
a
decisive
factor
people's
willingness
accept
the
vaccine.
We
searched
Medline,
Embase,
Web
of
Science
for
studies
investigating
length,
flow
volume,
post-menopausal
bleeding,
unexpected
or
intermenstrual
bleeding.
Data
were
analyzed
using
fixed-effects
meta-analysis
Shore's
adjusted
confidence
intervals
heterogeneity.
Seventeen
>1·9
million
participants
analyzed.
found
19%
greater
risk
increase
length
as
compared
unvaccinated
people
pre-vaccination
time-periods
(summary
relative
(sRR):
1·19;
95%
CI:
1·11-1·26;
n
=
23,718
participants).
was
same
Pfizer-BioNTech
(sRR:
1·15;
1·05-1·27;
16,595)
Moderna
1·05-1·25;
7,523),
similar
AstraZeneca
1·27;
1·02-1·59;
532),
higher
Janssen
1·69;
1·14-2·52;
751)
In
first
after
vaccination,
increased
by
Язык: Английский
Quantitative Synthesis of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Vaccine Hesitancy in 185 Countries
Vaccines,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(1), С. 34 - 34
Опубликована: Дек. 28, 2023
Mass
vaccination
against
COVID-19
is
the
best
method
to
ensure
herd
immunity
in
order
curb
effect
of
pandemic
on
global
economy.
It
therefore
important
assess
determinants
vaccine
acceptance
and
hesitancy
a
scale.
Factors
were
recorded
from
cross-sectional
studies
analyzed
with
t-Test,
ANOVA,
correlation,
meta-regression
analyses
synthesized
identify
trends
inform
policy.
We
registered
protocol
(ID:
CRD42022350418)
used
standard
Cochrane
methods
PRISMA
guidelines
collect
synthesize
articles
published
between
January
2020
August
2023.
A
total
67
576
185
countries
involving
3081,766
participants
included
this
synthesis.
Global
was
65.27%
(95%
CI;
62.72–67.84%),
while
stood
at
32.1%
29.05–35.17%).
One-Way
ANOVA
showed
that
there
no
significant
difference
percentage
Gross
Domestic
Product
spent
procurement
across
World
Bank
income
levels
(p
<
0.187).
There
0.001)
0.005)
different
Income
levels.
level
had
strong
influence
0.0004)
0.003)
but
did
not.
correlation
(r
=
−0.11,
p
0.164)
or
−0.09,
0.234).
Meta-regression
analysis
living
an
urban
setting
(OR
4.83,
95%
0.67–212.8),
rural
2.53,
0.29–119.33),
older
1.98,
0.99–4.07),
higher
education
1.76,
0.85–3.81),
being
low
earner
2.85,
0.45–30.63)
increased
odds
high
acceptance.
influenza
33.06,
5.03–1395.01),
mistrust
for
vaccines
3.91,
1.92–8.24),
complacency
2.86,
1.02–8.83),
pregnancy
2.3,
0.12–141.76),
taking
traditional
herbs
2.15,
0.52–10.42),
female
1.53,
0.78–3.01),
safety
concerns
1.29,
0.67–2.51).
proposed
number
recommendations
increase
COVID-19.
Язык: Английский