Alzheimer s & Dementia,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
20(8), С. 5143 - 5169
Опубликована: Июнь 27, 2024
Abstract
The
National
Institute
on
Aging
and
the
Alzheimer's
Association
convened
three
separate
work
groups
in
2011
single
2012
2018
to
create
recommendations
for
diagnosis
characterization
of
disease
(AD).
present
document
updates
research
framework
response
several
recent
developments.
Defining
diseases
biologically,
rather
than
based
syndromic
presentation,
has
long
been
standard
many
areas
medicine
(e.g.,
oncology),
is
becoming
a
unifying
concept
common
all
neurodegenerative
diseases,
not
just
AD.
consistent
with
this
principle.
Our
intent
objective
criteria
staging
AD,
incorporating
advances
biomarkers,
serve
as
bridge
between
clinical
care.
These
are
intended
provide
step‐by‐step
practice
guidelines
workflow
or
specific
treatment
protocols,
but
general
principles
inform
AD
that
reflect
current
science.
Highlights
We
define
(AD)
be
biological
process
begins
appearance
neuropathologic
change
(ADNPC)
while
people
asymptomatic.
Progression
burden
leads
later
progression
symptoms.
Early‐changing
Core
1
biomarkers
(amyloid
positron
emission
tomography
[PET],
approved
cerebrospinal
fluid
accurate
plasma
[especially
phosphorylated
tau
217])
map
onto
either
amyloid
beta
tauopathy
pathway;
however,
these
presence
ADNPC
more
generally
(i.e.,
both
neuritic
plaques
tangles).
An
abnormal
biomarker
result
sufficient
establish
decision
making
throughout
continuum.
Later‐changing
2
(biofluid
PET)
can
prognostic
information,
when
abnormal,
will
increase
confidence
contributing
integrated
scheme
described
accommodates
fact
copathologies,
cognitive
reserve,
resistance
may
modify
relationships
stages.
JAMA Neurology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
81(3), С. 255 - 255
Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2024
Importance
Phosphorylated
tau
(p-tau)
is
a
specific
blood
biomarker
for
Alzheimer
disease
(AD)
pathology,
with
p-tau217
considered
to
have
the
most
utility.
However,
availability
of
tests
research
and
clinical
use
has
been
limited.
Expanding
access
this
highly
accurate
AD
crucial
wider
evaluation
implementation
tests.
Objective
To
determine
utility
novel
commercially
available
immunoassay
plasma
detect
pathology
evaluate
reference
ranges
abnormal
amyloid
β
(Aβ)
longitudinal
change
across
3
selected
cohorts.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
cohort
study
examined
data
from
single-center
observational
cohorts:
cross-sectional
Translational
Biomarkers
in
Aging
Dementia
(TRIAD)
(visits
October
2017–August
2021)
Wisconsin
Registry
Alzheimer’s
Prevention
(WRAP)
February
2007–November
2020)
Sant
Pau
Initiative
on
Neurodegeneration
(SPIN)
(baseline
visits
March
2009–November
2021).
included
individuals
without
cognitive
impairment
grouped
by
(AT)
status
using
PET
or
CSF
biomarkers.
Data
were
analyzed
June
2023.
Exposures
Magnetic
resonance
imaging,
Aβ
positron
emission
tomography
(PET),
PET,
cerebrospinal
fluid
(CSF)
biomarkers
(Aβ42/40
p-tau
immunoassays),
(ALZpath
pTau217
assay).
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Accuracy
detecting
according
baseline
status.
Results
The
786
participants
(mean
[SD]
age,
66.3
[9.7]
years;
504
females
[64.1%]
282
males
[35.9%]).
High
accuracy
was
observed
identifying
elevated
(area
under
curve
[AUC],
0.92-0.96;
95%
CI,
0.89-0.99)
(AUC,
0.93-0.97;
0.84-0.99)
all
These
accuracies
comparable
determining
signal.
detection
3-range
yielded
reproducible
results
reduced
confirmatory
testing
approximately
80%.
Longitudinally,
values
showed
an
annual
increase
only
Aβ-positive
individuals,
highest
those
positivity.
Conclusions
Relevance
found
that
accurately
identified
biological
AD,
biomarkers,
cut-offs
It
detected
changes,
including
at
preclinical
stage.
Nature Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
30(4), С. 1085 - 1095
Опубликована: Фев. 21, 2024
With
the
emergence
of
Alzheimer's
disease
(AD)
disease-modifying
therapies,
identifying
patients
who
could
benefit
from
these
treatments
becomes
critical.
In
this
study,
we
evaluated
whether
a
precise
blood
test
perform
as
well
established
cerebrospinal
fluid
(CSF)
tests
in
detecting
amyloid-β
(Aβ)
plaques
and
tau
tangles.
Plasma
%p-tau217
(ratio
phosporylated-tau217
to
non-phosphorylated
tau)
was
analyzed
by
mass
spectrometry
Swedish
BioFINDER-2
cohort
(n
=
1,422)
US
Charles
F.
Joanne
Knight
Alzheimer
Disease
Research
Center
(Knight
ADRC)
337).
Matched
CSF
samples
were
with
clinically
used
FDA-approved
automated
immunoassays
for
Aβ42/40
p-tau181/Aβ42.
The
primary
secondary
outcomes
detection
brain
Aβ
or
pathology,
respectively,
using
positron
emission
tomography
(PET)
imaging
reference
standard.
Main
analyses
focused
on
individuals
cognitive
impairment
(mild
mild
dementia),
which
is
target
population
available
treatments.
equivalent
classifying
PET
status,
an
area
under
curve
(AUC)
both
between
0.95
0.97.
generally
superior
classification
tau-PET
AUCs
0.95-0.98.
cognitively
impaired
subcohorts
(BioFINDER-2:
n
720;
ADRC:
50),
plasma
had
accuracy,
positive
predictive
value
negative
89-90%
87-88%
tests,
further
improving
95%
two-cutoffs
approach.
Blood
demonstrated
performance
that
AD
pathology.
Use
high-performance
clinical
practice
can
improve
access
accurate
diagnosis
AD-specific
JAMA,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
332(15), С. 1245 - 1245
Опубликована: Июль 28, 2024
Importance
An
accurate
blood
test
for
Alzheimer
disease
(AD)
could
streamline
the
diagnostic
workup
and
treatment
of
AD.
Objective
To
prospectively
evaluate
a
clinically
available
AD
in
primary
care
secondary
using
predefined
biomarker
cutoff
values.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
There
were
1213
patients
undergoing
clinical
evaluation
due
to
cognitive
symptoms
who
examined
between
February
2020
January
2024
Sweden.
The
values
had
been
established
an
independent
cohort
applied
(n
=
307)
300);
1
plasma
sample
per
patient
was
analyzed
as
part
single
batch
each
cohort.
then
evaluated
208)
398);
sent
analysis
within
2
weeks
collection.
Exposure
Blood
tests
based
on
analyses
by
mass
spectrometry
determine
ratio
phosphorylated
tau
217
(p-tau217)
non–p-tau217
(expressed
percentage
p-tau217)
alone
when
combined
with
amyloid-β
42
40
(Aβ42:Aβ40)
(the
amyloid
probability
score
[APS2]).
Main
Outcomes
Measures
outcome
pathology
(determined
abnormal
cerebrospinal
fluid
Aβ42:Aβ40
p-tau217).
positive
predictive
value
(PPV),
negative
(NPV),
accuracy,
area
under
curve
(AUC)
calculated.
Results
mean
age
74.2
years
(SD,
8.3
years),
48%
women,
23%
subjective
decline,
44%
mild
impairment,
33%
dementia.
In
both
assessments,
50%
pathology.
When
samples
cohort,
AUC
0.97
(95%
CI,
0.95-0.99)
APS2
used,
PPV
91%
87%-96%),
NPV
92%
87%-96%);
0.96
0.94-0.98)
88%
83%-93%),
87%
82%-93%).
(biweekly)
81%-94%),
90%
84%-96%);
0.95-0.98)
87%-95%),
87%-95%).
accuracy
high
4
cohorts
(range,
88%-92%).
Primary
physicians
61%
53%-69%)
identifying
after
examination,
testing,
computed
tomographic
scan
vs
86%-96%)
APS2.
Dementia
specialists
73%
68%-79%)
88%-95%)
overall
population,
(90%
[95%
88%-92%])
not
different
from
p-tau217
88%-91%]).
Conclusions
Relevance
among
individuals
Future
studies
should
how
use
these
biomarkers
influences
care.
Nature Reviews Neurology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
20(7), С. 426 - 439
Опубликована: Июнь 12, 2024
Anti-amyloid
treatments
for
early
symptomatic
Alzheimer
disease
have
recently
become
clinically
available
in
some
countries,
which
has
greatly
increased
the
need
biomarker
confirmation
of
amyloid
pathology.
Blood
(BBM)
tests
pathology
are
more
acceptable,
accessible
and
scalable
than
PET
or
cerebrospinal
fluid
(CSF)
tests,
but
highly
variable
levels
performance.
The
Global
CEO
Initiative
on
Alzheimer's
Disease
convened
a
BBM
Workgroup
to
consider
minimum
acceptable
performance
clinical
use.
Amyloid
status
was
identified
as
reference
standard.
For
use
triaging
test
before
subsequent
confirmatory
such
CSF
recommends
that
sensitivity
≥90%
with
specificity
≥85%
primary
care
≥75–85%
secondary
depending
availability
follow-up
testing.
without
should
equivalent
—
~90%.
Importantly,
predictive
values
all
vary
according
pre-test
probability
must
be
interpreted
complete
context.
Use
meet
these
standards
could
enable
people
receive
an
accurate
timely
diagnosis
potentially
benefit
from
new
treatments.
blood
offer
test.
This
Consensus
Statement
provides
recommendations
JAMA Neurology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
81(1), С. 69 - 69
Опубликована: Дек. 4, 2023
Antiamyloid
immunotherapies
against
Alzheimer
disease
(AD)
are
emerging.
Scalable,
cost-effective
tools
will
be
needed
to
identify
amyloid
β
(Aβ)-positive
patients
without
an
advanced
stage
of
tau
pathology
who
most
likely
benefit
from
these
therapies.
Blood-based
biomarkers
might
reduce
the
need
use
cerebrospinal
fluid
(CSF)
or
positron
emission
tomography
(PET)
for
this.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
27(10), С. 901 - 915
Опубликована: Авг. 8, 2023
Modifiable
risk
and
protective
factors
for
boosting
brain
cognitive
development
preventing
neurodegeneration
decline
are
embraced
in
neuroimaging
studies.
We
call
sobriety
regarding
the
timing
quantity
of
such
influences
on
cognition.
Individual
differences
level
cognition,
many
which
present
already
at
birth
early
development,
appear
stable,
larger,
more
pervasive
than
change
across
lifespan.
Incorporating
early-life
factors,
including
genetics,
investigating
both
will
reduce
ascribing
undue
importance
causality
to
proximate
adulthood
older
age.
This
has
implications
mechanistic
understanding
prevention.
Importance
Since
2018,
a
movement
has
emerged
to
define
Alzheimer
disease
(AD)
as
purely
biological
entity
based
on
biomarker
findings.
The
recent
revision
of
the
Association
(AA)
criteria
for
AD
furthers
this
direction.
However,
concerns
about
definition
being
applied
clinically,
understanding
by
society
at
large,
and
translation
blood-based
biomarkers
into
clinical
practice
prompt
these
International
Working
Group
(IWG)
updated
recommendations.
Objective
To
consider
revised
AA
offer
an
alternative
definitional
view
clinical-biological
construct
use.
recommendations
2021
IWG
diagnostic
are
further
elaborating
at-risk
presymptomatic
states.
Evidence
Review
PubMed
was
searched
articles
published
between
July
1,
2020,
March
2024,
using
terms
“biomarker”
OR
“amyloid”
“tau”
“neurodegeneration”
“preclinical”
“CSF”
“PET”
“plasma”
AND
“Alzheimer’s
disease.”
references
relevant
were
also
searched.
Findings
In
new
criteria,
can
be
defined
clinically
encompassing
cognitively
normal
people
having
core
1
biomarker.
literature
shows
that
majority
biomarker-positive
individuals
will
not
become
symptomatic
along
proximate
timeline.
setting,
disclosing
diagnosis
with
only
represents
most
problematic
implication
disease.
Conclusions
Relevance
ultimate
aim
field
foster
effective
treatments,
including
preventing
symptoms
dementia.
approach
diagnosing
without
would
unwarranted
potentially
concerning
clear
knowledge
when
or
whether
ever
develop.
It
is
recommended
those
who
amyloid-positive
and,
more
generally,
individuals,
should
labeled
AD.
Rather,
they
considered
risk
expansion
viewed
better
specific
pattern
biomarkers,
indicating
expression
in
near
future.
Alzheimer s & Dementia,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(12), С. 5860 - 5871
Опубликована: Авг. 31, 2023
Abstract
With
the
increase
in
large
multimodal
cohorts
and
high‐throughput
technologies,
potential
for
discovering
novel
biomarkers
is
no
longer
limited
by
data
set
size.
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
machine
learning
approaches
have
been
developed
to
detect
interactions
complex
sets.
We
discuss
exemplar
uses
evaluate
current
applications
limitations
of
AI
discover
biomarkers.
Remaining
challenges
include
a
lack
diversity
sets
available,
sheer
complexity
investigating
interactions,
invasiveness
cost
some
biomarkers,
poor
reporting
studies.
Overcoming
these
will
involve
collecting
from
underrepresented
populations,
developing
more
powerful
approaches,
validating
use
noninvasive
adhering
guidelines.
By
harnessing
rich
through
international
collaborative
innovation,
we
are
well
positioned
identify
clinically
useful
that
accurate,
generalizable,
unbiased,
acceptable
clinical
practice.
Highlights
may
accelerate
dementia
biomarker
discovery.
suitability
due
size
bias
cohort
selection.
Multimodal
data,
diverse
sets,
improved
real‐world
validation,
interdisciplinary
collaboration
required.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
24(18), С. 13900 - 13900
Опубликована: Сен. 9, 2023
In
an
ever-increasing
aged
world,
Alzheimer’s
disease
(AD)
represents
the
first
cause
of
dementia
and
one
chronic
diseases
in
elderly
people.
With
55
million
people
affected,
WHO
considers
AD
to
be
a
with
public
priority.
Unfortunately,
there
are
no
final
cures
for
this
pathology.
Treatment
strategies
aimed
mitigate
symptoms,
i.e.,
acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors
(AChEI)
N-Methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA)
antagonist
Memantine.
At
present,
best
approaches
managing
seem
combine
pharmacological
non-pharmacological
therapies
stimulate
cognitive
reserve.
Over
last
twenty
years,
number
drugs
have
been
discovered
acting
on
well-established
biological
hallmarks
AD,
deposition
β-amyloid
aggregates
accumulation
hyperphosphorylated
tau
protein
cells.
Although
previous
efforts
disappointed
expectations,
new
era
treating
has
working
its
way
recently.
The
Food
Drug
Administration
(FDA)
gave
conditional
approval
disease-modifying
therapy
(DMT)
treatment
aducanumab,
monoclonal
antibody
(mAb)
designed
against
Aβ
plaques
oligomers
2021,
January
2023,
FDA
granted
accelerated
second
antibody,
Lecanemab.
This
review
describes
ongoing
clinical
trials
DMTs
therapies.
We
will
also
present
future
scenario
based
biomarkers
that
can
detect
preclinical
or
prodromal
stages,
identify
at
risk
developing
allow
early
curative
treatment.