Earth System Governance,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
21, С. 100219 - 100219
Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2024
Science-policy
interfaces
are
influential
institutions
that
support
policymakers
in
addressing
complex
environmental
challenges.
However,
the
power
SPIs
wield
this
capacity
has
been
largely
overlooked
by
existing
literature,
which
primarily
focused
on
effectiveness
of
SPIs,
often
portraying
them
as
apolitical
and
policy-neutral
institutions.
Drawing
an
integrative
literature
review,
article
proposes
a
shift
from
towards
justifying
through
assessing
their
legitimacy.
We
develop
framework
for
enhancing
democratic
epistemic
quality
comprises
12
criteria
across
three
dimensions
input,
throughput,
output
Input
legitimacy
include
inclusivity,
consideration
multiple
knowledge
systems,
transdisciplinarity.
Throughput
address
process
accessibility,
transparency,
reflexivity,
conflict
management,
accountability.
Output
cover
efficacy,
understandability,
dissemination.
The
provides
pathway
to
foster
both
knowledge-based
participatory
decision-making,
providing
scholars
practitioners
evaluative
tool
bridge
potential
tensions
between
expertise
representation
governance.
Environmental Science & Policy,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
144, С. 162 - 173
Опубликована: Март 28, 2023
Democratic
societies
face
the
challenge
of
effecting
sustainability
transformations,
allowing
for
variously
imagined
futures
and
underpinned
by
a
diversity
practices
knowledge
production
action.
This
article
investigates
how
political
imagination
sustainable
informs
ways
action
are
understood
linked
in
research
policy,
what
potential
implications
this
has
democratic
transformative
change.
Empirically,
analyses
overarching
policies
Sweden,
focusing
on
central
documents
produced
government
public
financiers.
The
analysis
shows
parallels
between
conceptualisations
knowledge-action,
characterised
linearity,
instrumentalisation
circumscription
power-sharing
spaces
creation
against
background
endorsement
collaborations
academia
society.
Such
conceptualisations,
apart
from
sending
mixed
signals
to
researchers
practitioners,
potentially
enable
processes
driven
impact,
competitiveness
atomisation,
precluding
exercise
intrinsic
value
necessary
reflexive
governance
transformations
towards
sustainability.
Environmental Values,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
33(2), С. 139 - 162
Опубликована: Март 25, 2024
Scholars
have
critiqued
mainstream
economic
approaches
to
environmental
valuation
for
decades.
These
critiques
intensified
with
the
increased
prominence
of
in
decision-making.
This
paper
has
three
goals.
First,
we
summarise
prominent
monetary
valuation,
drawing
mostly
on
work
Clive
Spash,
who
worked
extensively
cost–benefit
analysis
early
his
career
and
then
became
one
valuation's
most
thorough
ardent
critics.
Second,
we,
as
a
group
scholars
study
relational
values,
describe
how
values
research
engages
addresses
many
valuation.
Third,
offer
suggestions
that
continues
deepens
its
ability
respond
contributes
transformative
change
towards
sustainability.
Environmental Science & Policy,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
156, С. 103750 - 103750
Опубликована: Апрель 4, 2024
Urban
governance,
the
interplay
of
governmental
bodies
with
other
actors
shaping
decision-making
and
its
implementation,
plays
a
key
role
for
mitigation
adaptation
measures
in
cities.
While
knowledge
co-production
is
advanced
as
an
instrumental
approach
to
support
climate
action,
gap
between
implementation
persists.
The
objective
article
better
understand
complex
nature
urban
governance
which
science
–
through
data
people
expected
with.
We
introduce
framework,
based
on
analytical
lens
co-production,
unpack
entanglements
rules
norms,
interests
visions,
capacities
particular
local
context
order
identify
aspects
that
may
encourage
meaningful
co-production.
build
upon
two
cities
case
studies:
Hamburg,
Germany
São
Paulo,
Brazil.
present
results
interviews
dialogue
insights
from
city
documents
online
workshop.
found
even
though
expertise
available,
use
remains
unsystematic,
while
action
mostly
hampered
by
missing
political
capacity,
silo
mentalities,
structural
lack
resources.
identified
paradox
where
social
transformation
addressed
technocratic
solutions
high
appreciation
mutual
learning
processes.
conclude
make
transformative
potential,
practice
needs
become
more
holistic.
This
includes
integration
non-climate
information
linked
concerns
values
well
shift
focus
output
procedural
benefits.
Earth System Governance,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
21, С. 100219 - 100219
Опубликована: Авг. 1, 2024
Science-policy
interfaces
are
influential
institutions
that
support
policymakers
in
addressing
complex
environmental
challenges.
However,
the
power
SPIs
wield
this
capacity
has
been
largely
overlooked
by
existing
literature,
which
primarily
focused
on
effectiveness
of
SPIs,
often
portraying
them
as
apolitical
and
policy-neutral
institutions.
Drawing
an
integrative
literature
review,
article
proposes
a
shift
from
towards
justifying
through
assessing
their
legitimacy.
We
develop
framework
for
enhancing
democratic
epistemic
quality
comprises
12
criteria
across
three
dimensions
input,
throughput,
output
Input
legitimacy
include
inclusivity,
consideration
multiple
knowledge
systems,
transdisciplinarity.
Throughput
address
process
accessibility,
transparency,
reflexivity,
conflict
management,
accountability.
Output
cover
efficacy,
understandability,
dissemination.
The
provides
pathway
to
foster
both
knowledge-based
participatory
decision-making,
providing
scholars
practitioners
evaluative
tool
bridge
potential
tensions
between
expertise
representation
governance.
