Evaluation of the social-economic impacts of hyena attacks on humans and livestock in the Nyang’whale district of Tanzania DOI Creative Commons

Noela Samwel Hello,

Rosemary Peter Mramba, Doreen Mrimi

и другие.

BMC Ecology and Evolution, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(1)

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024

The spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) is one of the carnivore species that frequently comes into conflict with humans. These conflicts are attributed to their scavenging foraging behaviour and ability occupy habitats close human settlements. In Tanzania, Geita region has recently experienced an increase in livestock attacks by hyenas. However, there limited studies examining extent these associated social-economic impacts. Thus, this study evaluated social impacts economic losses due Nyang'whale district region. was carried out three villages district, namely Wavu, which Mienze Forest Reserve; Bukungu, far from forest but surrounded many hills; Izunya, hills. Data collection done through household surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews. A Chi-square test assessed association between fear daily activities across villages. Poisson regression compared number attacked hyenas village species. Linear analysis financial reductions working time There a significant variation frequency lower Bukungu village, were highest village. Wavu forest, had attacks, no reported. created fear, changed routines villagers. most reported high rate school dropouts, while reduction sleeping at night watch livestock. Economic averaged $300.5 per year, reduced equivalent $285.6 year. Given large more fewer suggests may target humans when food resources limited. Therefore, conducting further assess population availability natural prey crucial for formulating effective intervention strategies. Additionally, villagers should be educated on ways control based animals' ecology behaviour.

Язык: Английский

Collaborative Adaptive Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A Rangeland Living Laboratory at the US Sheep Experiment Station DOI Open Access
Hailey Wilmer, Jonathan W. Spiess, Patrick E. Clark

и другие.

Sustainability, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 17(7), С. 3086 - 3086

Опубликована: Март 31, 2025

Social conflict over rangeland-use priorities, especially near protected areas, has long pitted environmental and biodiversity conservation interests against livestock livelihoods. Social–ecological limits management adaptation creativity while reinforcing social disciplinary divisions. It can also reduce rancher access to land negatively affect wildlife conservation. Communities increasingly expect research organizations address complex dynamics improve opportunities for multiple ecosystem service delivery on rangelands. In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), an area of western US, long-standing disagreements among actors who argue use those prioritize are limiting ranching Researchers at USDA-ARS US Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) along with University societal partners responding these challenges using a collaborative adaptive (CAM) methodology. The USSES Rangeland Collaboratory is living laboratory project leveraging resources federal range sheep ranch operating across sagebrush steppe ecosystems in Clark County, Idaho, montane/subalpine landscapes Beaverhead Montana. places stakeholders, including ranchers, groups, government managers, decision-making seat participatory case study. This involves planning related grazing livestock–wildlife decisions two ranch-scale rangeland scenarios, one modeled after traditional operation second, more intensified no summer ranges. We discuss extent which CAM approach creates multi-directional learning participants evaluate trade-offs preferred systems through research. system where needs goals various misaligned spatiotemporal, disciplinary, social–ecological scales, structure methods focus knowledge creation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Ifakara-Lupiro-Mang'ula Wildlife Management Area in Southern Tanzania DOI Creative Commons

Lucia J. Tarimo,

Deogratius R. Kavishe, Fidelma Butler

и другие.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 14, 2024

Abstract In Tanzania, Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) are established on village lands, usually adjacent to centrally managed core protected areas like national parks and game reserves, in a devolved manner by local authorities. WMAs intended conserve wildlife outside such areas, while also providing opportunities for communities derive tangible benefits from other natural resources. This study evaluates the perceived effectiveness of Ifakara-Lupiro-Mang’ula (ILUMA) WMA southern Tanzania among various stakeholders, focusing its conservation, livelihoods community development functions. Based thematic analysis perspectives shared stakeholders at national, regional, district levels through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions public meeting, was considered have succeeded only very modest extent achieving goals. Essentially all participants narrated that area is heavily encroached human activities, including livestock grazing, agriculture, illegal fishing, meat poaching, deforestation, charcoal burning, timber harvesting even permanent settlements. Contributing factors include recently growing influx agro-pastoralist immigrants, top-down political interference, financial constraints, mismanagement, limited resources operations, lack conservation education, investors or government support, recent displacement encroachment pressure newly upgraded, centrally-managed nearby. To ensure future success sustainability WMA, recommended enhancing stakeholder involvement participation management, improved collaboration with nearby implementing overhaul constitution reflect current best practices, building capacity relevant leaders elected representatives initiating education initiatives community. Overall, should explore alternative income sources beyond tourism, direct member sustainable, carefully-regulated access resources, resolve ongoing conflict over land use between long-established villages govern ILUMA agro-pastoralists immigrants who moved into more recently.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Evaluation of the social-economic impacts of hyena attacks on humans and livestock in the Nyang’whale district of Tanzania DOI Creative Commons

Noela Samwel Hello,

Rosemary Peter Mramba, Doreen Mrimi

и другие.

BMC Ecology and Evolution, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(1)

Опубликована: Дек. 18, 2024

The spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) is one of the carnivore species that frequently comes into conflict with humans. These conflicts are attributed to their scavenging foraging behaviour and ability occupy habitats close human settlements. In Tanzania, Geita region has recently experienced an increase in livestock attacks by hyenas. However, there limited studies examining extent these associated social-economic impacts. Thus, this study evaluated social impacts economic losses due Nyang'whale district region. was carried out three villages district, namely Wavu, which Mienze Forest Reserve; Bukungu, far from forest but surrounded many hills; Izunya, hills. Data collection done through household surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews. A Chi-square test assessed association between fear daily activities across villages. Poisson regression compared number attacked hyenas village species. Linear analysis financial reductions working time There a significant variation frequency lower Bukungu village, were highest village. Wavu forest, had attacks, no reported. created fear, changed routines villagers. most reported high rate school dropouts, while reduction sleeping at night watch livestock. Economic averaged $300.5 per year, reduced equivalent $285.6 year. Given large more fewer suggests may target humans when food resources limited. Therefore, conducting further assess population availability natural prey crucial for formulating effective intervention strategies. Additionally, villagers should be educated on ways control based animals' ecology behaviour.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0