Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Emerging contaminants, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 100475 - 100475
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3Deleted Journal, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 1(1)
Опубликована: Март 9, 2024
Sufficiency principles require that each person has enough.This article explores two such principles, located towards opposing ends of the political spectrum. Conservative affirms a permission to transform natural resources benefit oneself or other people, provided doing so is compatible with present and future people all having enough, but denies relevance of additional distributive requirements, like Equality Priority. By contrast, according Conservationist Sufficiency, what everybody enough undermines not Priority, our justification for further environmental damage, including damage harmful humans nonhumans. Defendingthe over interpretation, this explains its appeal only those who care about animals environment, also share concerns in thought J. S. Mill John Rawls.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
12Ethics Policy & Environment, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 11
Опубликована: Май 17, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Politics Philosophy & Economics, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Май 20, 2025
Can economics reflect climate justice? Although the scenario forecasts of economists are key inputs to IPCC assessments, their ethical assumptions fail important considerations justice. This is clearest regarding sufficientarian justice, which requires that no person falls below a minimum level well-being. view reflected in an strand diplomacy and activism highlights plight those most vulnerable harms. However, I show justice largely incompatible with predominant approaches economic modelling. then examine prospects for economics, considering dual discounting approaches, well-being ‘guardrails’ basic needs find latter two closest sufficientarianism, although they different interpretations its core claims. Finally, consider whether sufficientarianism ‘degrowth’, as some have claimed. argue compatible periods growth, but likely be indefinite pursuit growth due ecological impacts this would entail. Since standard assumption reiterates need new just sustainable future.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 20
Опубликована: Авг. 13, 2024
The biodiversity crisis should be a key issue within debates on global justice – but to date it has not been. This article aims provide stimulus further engagement. First, provides brief introduction the notion of crisis, and its origins. Second, distinguishes our various reasons for caring about crisis. Third, shows why raises important albeit hitherto neglected issues justice. Fourth, sketches some most questions scholars in position engage with, order move debate forwards help ensure that collective political responses are just ones.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2Elsevier eBooks, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1