Cancer,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
127(6), С. 850 - 864
Опубликована: Дек. 3, 2020
Background
Despite
the
significant
societal
burden
of
human
papillomavirus
(HPV)–associated
cancers,
clinical
screening
interventions
for
HPV‐associated
noncervical
cancers
are
not
available.
Blood‐based
biomarkers
may
help
close
this
gap
in
care.
Methods
Five
databases
were
searched,
5687
articles
identified,
and
3631
unique
candidate
titles
abstracts
independently
reviewed
by
2
authors;
702
underwent
a
full‐text
review.
Eligibility
criteria
included
assessment
blood‐based
biomarker
within
cohort
or
case‐control
study.
Results
One
hundred
thirty‐seven
studies
included.
Among
all
assessed,
HPV‐16
E
seropositivity
circulating
HPV
DNA
most
significantly
correlated
with
comparison
cancer‐free
controls.
In
scenarios,
E6
varied
nonsignificantly
according
to
tumor
type,
specimen
collection
timing,
anatomic
site
(crude
odds
ratio
[cOR]
p16+
HPV+
oropharyngeal
cancer
[OPC],
133.10;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI],
59.40‐298.21;
cOR
HPV‐unspecified
OPC,
25.41;
CI,
8.71‐74.06;
prediagnostic
59.00;
15.39‐226.25;
cervical
cancer,
12.05;
3.23‐44.97;
anal
73.60;
19.68‐275.33;
penile
16.25;
2.83‐93.48).
Circulating
was
valid
(cOR,
15.72;
3.41‐72.57).
3
studies,
cases
exhibited
microRNA
expression
profiles
Other
assessed
candidates
valid.
Conclusions
antibodies
robustly
analyzed
promising
date.
Comparative
validity
analyses
warranted.
Variations
type–specific,
high‐risk
prevalence
world
region
highlight
need
targeting
more
types.
Further
investigation
profiling
appears
indicated.
Journal of Infection,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 106438 - 106438
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Highlights•Oral
rinse
is
the
most
common
measure
for
estimating
oral
HPV
prevalence.•We
compared
to
pharyngeal
wall
and
tongue
base
brushes,
&
tonsil
tissue.•Combining
all
four
sites,
any
HR-HPV
prevalence
were
18%
4.3%.•Oral
misses
73%
(11/15)
of
cases
detected
by
other
sites.•All
4
sample
types
combined
improves
detection
over
alone
38%.AbstractObjectivesHuman
papillomavirus
(HPV)
mediated
oropharyngeal
cancer
(OPC)
incidence
has
increased
dramatically.
Accurate
data
are
essential
assessing
population
epidemiology,
vaccination
screening
programmes.
As
commonly
used
primary
outcome
prevalence,
we
aimed
compare
efficacy
against
methods.MethodsThe
Oromouth
study
enrolled
945
participants,
aged
0-65
years
(63%
female),
undergoing
tonsillectomy
non-malignant
indications,
without
OPC
diagnoses.
Samples
from
rinse,
wall,
base,
tissue
blood
collected.
DNA
in
samples
was
centrally
tested
via
polymerase
chain
reaction,
serology
antibodies.
Statistical
analyses
assessed
rates
ratios.ResultsCombining
collection
high-risk
(HR)-HPV
4·3%
18%,
respectively.
similar
between
males
(4·1%)
females
(4·5%).
Oral
had
highest
(4·0%)
(16%),
but
still
missed
identified
as
HR-HPV-positive
sites.
Compared
alone,
an
additional
38%
(11/29)
infections
picked
up
three
methods.
Addition
testing
did
not
result
substantial
improvement.ConclusionsOf
demonstrates
far
important
limitations.
These
findings
should
be
taken
into
consideration
when
infection
rates,
especially
studies
Background
Among
head
and
neck
squamous
cell
carcinomas
(HNSCCs),
the
incidence
of
oropharyngeal
cancer
(OPC)
has
been
increasing
in
recent
decades.
Human
papillomavirus
(HPV)
type
16
is
associated
with
majority
OPC.
Circulating
antibodies
(Abs)
to
multiple
HPV16
early
antigens,
including
E2,
E6,
E7,
have
detected
patient
sera,
are
strongly
risk
for
However,
HPV
serology
currently
requires
laboratory-based
tests
that
difficult
implement
large-scale
screening.
Objective
The
goal
this
study
was
develop
validate
a
point-of-care
assay
rapid
detection
circulating
IgG
antigens.
Methods
We
measured
Abs
E7
proteins
using
lateral
flow
(LFA)
sera
from
119
newly
diagnosed
OPC
cases,
41
partners,
81
healthy
volunteers.
patients
HPV-OPC
were
classified
as
HPV-positive
based
on
situ
hybridization
(ISH)
or
institutional
p16
immunohistochemistry.
sensitivity
specificity
LFA
determined
by
comparing
clinical
diagnosis.
Results
each
individual
95.1%
(77/81),
96.3%
(78/81),
98.7%
(80/81),
respectively.
sensitivities
follows:
47.9%
(57/119),
31.9%
(38/119),
57.1%
(68/119).
3-biomarker
panel
(at
least
one
positive
Abs)
demonstrated
76.5%
(91/119)
92.6%
(75/81).
Conclusions
developed
multiplexed
serologic
responses
HPV16.
Further
research
required
determine
utility
these
+
HNSCC
screening,
higher
specificity,
an
assessment
benefits
test
results
yet
be
evaluated
context.
Cancer,
Год журнала:
2020,
Номер
127(6), С. 850 - 864
Опубликована: Дек. 3, 2020
Background
Despite
the
significant
societal
burden
of
human
papillomavirus
(HPV)–associated
cancers,
clinical
screening
interventions
for
HPV‐associated
noncervical
cancers
are
not
available.
Blood‐based
biomarkers
may
help
close
this
gap
in
care.
Methods
Five
databases
were
searched,
5687
articles
identified,
and
3631
unique
candidate
titles
abstracts
independently
reviewed
by
2
authors;
702
underwent
a
full‐text
review.
Eligibility
criteria
included
assessment
blood‐based
biomarker
within
cohort
or
case‐control
study.
Results
One
hundred
thirty‐seven
studies
included.
Among
all
assessed,
HPV‐16
E
seropositivity
circulating
HPV
DNA
most
significantly
correlated
with
comparison
cancer‐free
controls.
In
scenarios,
E6
varied
nonsignificantly
according
to
tumor
type,
specimen
collection
timing,
anatomic
site
(crude
odds
ratio
[cOR]
p16+
HPV+
oropharyngeal
cancer
[OPC],
133.10;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI],
59.40‐298.21;
cOR
HPV‐unspecified
OPC,
25.41;
CI,
8.71‐74.06;
prediagnostic
59.00;
15.39‐226.25;
cervical
cancer,
12.05;
3.23‐44.97;
anal
73.60;
19.68‐275.33;
penile
16.25;
2.83‐93.48).
Circulating
was
valid
(cOR,
15.72;
3.41‐72.57).
3
studies,
cases
exhibited
microRNA
expression
profiles
Other
assessed
candidates
valid.
Conclusions
antibodies
robustly
analyzed
promising
date.
Comparative
validity
analyses
warranted.
Variations
type–specific,
high‐risk
prevalence
world
region
highlight
need
targeting
more
types.
Further
investigation
profiling
appears
indicated.