Gender Work and Organization, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 13, 2025
Язык: Английский
Gender Work and Organization, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 13, 2025
Язык: Английский
The American Journal of Surgery, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 116271 - 116271
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Опубликована: Фев. 27, 2025
Abstract Objective States’ reproductive health policies may have consequences for the rate of unintended pregnancy. This study analyzed association states’ rights with likelihood respondents reporting (wanted later and unwanted pregnancies) Study design was a cross‐sectional analysis Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System using 2016–2019 data from 43 states DC. Institute Women's Policy Research state rankings were used to categorize as having restricted, some protection, or protected rights. Poisson regressions estimate associations pregnancies, controlling individual‐level sociodemographic characteristics. A sensitivity restricted Medicaid‐covered births performed. Results total 154,062 represented weighted population 7,826,006 whom 25.6% reported an 6.6% When compared rights, had 6% higher pregnancy (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04, 1.10). amplified when limited Medicaid (13% likelihood, IRR 1.13, 1.08, 1.17). Conclusion State associated pregnancies. Further restricting at level increase this already major economic burden.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Gender Work and Organization, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 13, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0