Large
language
models
(LLMs)
excel
in
providing
natural
responses
that
sound
authoritative,
reflect
knowledge
of
the
context
area,
and
can
present
from
a
range
varied
perspectives.
Agent
Based
Models
Simulation
consist
simulated
agents
interact
within
environment
to
explore
societal,
social,
ethical,
among
other,
problems.
Agents
generate
large
volumes
data
over
time
discerning
useful
relevant
content
is
an
onerous
task.
LLMs
help
communicating
agents’
perspectives
on
key
events
by
narratives.
However,
these
narratives
need
be
factual,
transparent,
reproducible.
To
this
end,
we
structured
narrative
prompt
for
sending
queries
LLMs.
Chi-square
tests
Fisher’s
Exact
are
applied
assess
statistically
significant
difference
sentiment
scores
messages
between
simulation
generated
narratives,
ChatGPT-generated
real
tweets.
The
structure
effectively
yields
with
desired
components
ChatGPT.
This
expected
extensible
across
In
14
out
44
categories,
ChatGPT
which
has
were
not
discernibly
different,
terms
statistical
significance
(alpha
level
0.05),
expressed
Three
outcomes
provided:
(1)
list
benefits
challenges
generation;
(2)
requesting
LLM
based
information;
(3)
assessment
prevalence
compared
indicates
promise
utilization
helping
connect
agent’s
experiences
people.
Medicina,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
60(3), С. 445 - 445
Опубликована: Март 8, 2024
The
integration
of
large
language
models
(LLMs)
into
healthcare,
particularly
in
nephrology,
represents
a
significant
advancement
applying
advanced
technology
to
patient
care,
medical
research,
and
education.
These
have
progressed
from
simple
text
processors
tools
capable
deep
understanding,
offering
innovative
ways
handle
health-related
data,
thus
improving
practice
efficiency
effectiveness.
A
challenge
applications
LLMs
is
their
imperfect
accuracy
and/or
tendency
produce
hallucinations—outputs
that
are
factually
incorrect
or
irrelevant.
This
issue
critical
where
precision
essential,
as
inaccuracies
can
undermine
the
reliability
these
crucial
decision-making
processes.
To
overcome
challenges,
various
strategies
been
developed.
One
such
strategy
prompt
engineering,
like
chain-of-thought
approach,
which
directs
towards
more
accurate
responses
by
breaking
down
problem
intermediate
steps
reasoning
sequences.
Another
one
retrieval-augmented
generation
(RAG)
strategy,
helps
address
hallucinations
integrating
external
enhancing
output
relevance.
Hence,
RAG
favored
for
tasks
requiring
up-to-date,
comprehensive
information,
clinical
decision
making
educational
applications.
In
this
article,
we
showcase
creation
specialized
ChatGPT
model
integrated
with
system,
tailored
align
KDIGO
2023
guidelines
chronic
kidney
disease.
example
demonstrates
its
potential
providing
specialized,
advice,
marking
step
reliable
efficient
nephrology
practices.
Quantitative Science Studies,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
5(3), С. 736 - 756
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Abstract
This
paper
examines
the
comparative
effectiveness
of
a
specialized
compiled
language
model
and
general-purpose
such
as
OpenAI’s
GPT-3.5
in
detecting
sustainable
development
goals
(SDGs)
within
text
data.
It
presents
critical
review
large
models
(LLMs),
addressing
challenges
related
to
bias
sensitivity.
The
necessity
training
for
precise,
unbiased
analysis
is
underlined.
A
case
study
using
company
descriptions
data
set
offers
insight
into
differences
between
SDG
detection
model.
While
boasts
broader
coverage,
it
may
identify
SDGs
with
limited
relevance
companies’
activities.
In
contrast,
zeroes
on
highly
pertinent
SDGs.
importance
thoughtful
selection
emphasized,
taking
account
task
requirements,
cost,
complexity,
transparency.
Despite
versatility
LLMs,
use
suggested
tasks
demanding
precision
accuracy.
concludes
by
encouraging
further
research
find
balance
capabilities
LLMs
need
domain-specific
expertise
interpretability.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2024
Abstract
Background
The
rapid
advancement
of
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
led
to
the
wide
dissemination
models
with
exceptional
understanding
and
generation
human
language.
Their
integration
into
healthcare
shown
potential
for
improving
medical
diagnostics,
yet
a
comprehensive
diagnostic
performance
evaluation
AI
comparison
their
that
physicians
not
been
extensively
explored.
Methods
In
this
systematic
review
meta-analysis,
search
Medline,
Scopus,
Web
Science,
Cochrane
Central,
MedRxiv
was
conducted
studies
published
from
June
2018
through
December
2023,
focusing
on
those
validate
tasks.
risk
bias
assessed
using
Prediction
Model
Study
Risk
Bias
Assessment
Tool.
Meta-regression
performed
summarize
compare
accuracy
physicians.
Results
resulted
in
54
being
included
meta-analysis.
Nine
were
evaluated
across
17
specialties.
quality
assessment
indicated
high
majority
studies,
primarily
due
small
sample
sizes.
overall
56.9%
(95%
confidence
interval
[CI]:
51.0–62.7%).
meta-analysis
demonstrated
that,
average,
exceeded
(difference
accuracy:
14.4%
[95%
CI:
4.9–23.8%],
p-value
=0.004).
However,
both
Prometheus
(Bing)
GPT-4
showed
slightly
better
compared
non-experts
(-2.3%
-27.0–22.4%],
=
0.848
-0.32%
-14.4–13.7%],
0.962),
but
underperformed
when
experts
(10.9%
-13.1–35.0%],
0.356
12.9%
0.15–25.7%],
0.048).
sub-analysis
revealed
significantly
improved
fields
Gynecology,
Pediatrics,
Orthopedic
surgery,
Plastic
Otolaryngology,
while
showing
reduced
Neurology,
Psychiatry,
Rheumatology,
Endocrinology
General
Medicine.
No
significant
heterogeneity
observed
based
bias.
Conclusions
Generative
exhibits
promising
capabilities,
varying
by
model
specialty.
Although
they
have
reached
reliability
expert
physicians,
findings
suggest
enhance
delivery
education,
provided
are
integrated
caution
limitations
well-understood.
Key
Points
Question:
What
is
how
does
physicians?
Findings:
This
found
pooled
interval:
exceeds
all
specialties,
however,
some
comparable
non-expert
Meaning:
suggests
do
match
level
experienced
may
applications
education.
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
potential
of
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs)
in
healthcare
diagnostics,
specifically
their
ability
analyze
symptom-based
prompts
and
provide
accurate
diagnoses.
The
focused
on
models
including
GPT-4,
GPT-4o,
Gemini,
o1
Preview,
GPT-3.5,
assessing
performance
identifying
illnesses
based
solely
provided
symptoms.
Symptom-based
were
curated
from
reputable
medical
sources
ensure
validity
relevance.
Each
model
was
tested
under
controlled
conditions
diagnostic
accuracy,
precision,
recall,
decision-making
capabilities.
Specific
scenarios
designed
explore
both
general
high-stakes
tasks.
Among
models,
GPT-4
achieved
highest
demonstrating
strong
alignment
with
reasoning.
Gemini
excelled
requiring
precise
decision-making.
GPT-4o
Preview
showed
balanced
performance,
effectively
handling
real-time
tasks
a
focus
precision
recall.
though
less
advanced,
proved
dependable
for
highlights
strengths
limitations
LLMs
diagnostics.
While
such
as
exhibit
promise,
challenges
privacy
compliance,
ethical
considerations,
mitigation
inherent
biases
must
be
addressed.
findings
suggest
pathways
responsibly
integrating
into
processes
enhance
outcomes.
Clinics and Practice,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
14(1), С. 89 - 105
Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2023
The
emergence
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
greatly
propelled
progress
across
various
sectors
including
the
field
nephrology
academia.
However,
this
advancement
also
given
rise
to
ethical
challenges,
notably
in
scholarly
writing.
AI’s
capacity
automate
labor-intensive
tasks
like
literature
reviews
and
data
analysis
created
opportunities
for
unethical
practices,
with
scholars
incorporating
AI-generated
text
into
their
manuscripts,
potentially
undermining
academic
integrity.
This
situation
gives
a
range
dilemmas
that
not
only
question
authenticity
contemporary
endeavors
but
challenge
credibility
peer-review
process
integrity
editorial
oversight.
Instances
misconduct
are
highlighted,
spanning
from
lesser-known
journals
reputable
ones,
even
infiltrating
graduate
theses
grant
applications.
subtle
AI
intrusion
hints
at
systemic
vulnerability
within
publishing
domain,
exacerbated
by
publish-or-perish
mentality.
solutions
aimed
mitigating
employment
academia
include
adoption
sophisticated
AI-driven
plagiarism
detection
systems,
robust
augmentation
an
“AI
scrutiny”
phase,
comprehensive
training
academics
on
usage,
promotion
culture
transparency
acknowledges
role
research.
review
underscores
pressing
need
collaborative
efforts
among
institutions
foster
environment
application,
thus
preserving
esteemed
face
rapid
technological
advancements.
It
makes
plea
rigorous
research
assess
extent
involvement
literature,
evaluate
effectiveness
AI-enhanced
tools,
understand
long-term
consequences
utilization
An
example
framework
been
proposed
outline
approach
integrating
Nephrology
writing
peer
review.
Using
proactive
initiatives
evaluations,
harmonious
harnesses
capabilities
while
upholding
stringent
standards
can
be
envisioned.
npj Digital Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
7(1)
Опубликована: Авг. 7, 2024
This
study
evaluates
multimodal
AI
models'
accuracy
and
responsiveness
in
answering
NEJM
Image
Challenge
questions,
juxtaposed
with
human
collective
intelligence,
underscoring
AI's
potential
current
limitations
clinical
diagnostics.
Anthropic's
Claude
3
family
demonstrated
the
highest
among
evaluated
models,
surpassing
average
accuracy,
while
decision-making
outperformed
all
models.
GPT-4
Vision
Preview
exhibited
selectivity,
responding
more
to
easier
questions
smaller
images
longer
questions.
npj Digital Medicine,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
8(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 28, 2025
Abstract
Rare
diseases,
affecting
~350
million
people
worldwide,
pose
significant
challenges
in
clinical
diagnosis
due
to
the
lack
of
experienced
physicians
and
complexity
differentiating
between
numerous
rare
diseases.
To
address
these
challenges,
we
introduce
PhenoBrain,
a
fully
automated
artificial
intelligence
pipeline.
PhenoBrain
utilizes
BERT-based
natural
language
processing
model
extract
phenotypes
from
texts
EHRs
employs
five
new
diagnostic
models
for
differential
diagnoses
The
AI
system
was
developed
evaluated
on
diverse,
multi-country
disease
datasets,
comprising
2271
cases
with
431
In
1936
test
cases,
achieved
an
average
predicted
top-3
recall
0.513
top-10
0.654,
surpassing
13
leading
prediction
methods.
human-computer
study
75
exhibited
exceptional
performance
0.613
0.813,
50
specialist
large
like
ChatGPT
GPT-4.
Combining
PhenoBrain’s
predictions
specialists
increased
0.768,
demonstrating
its
potential
enhance
accuracy
workflows.
JMIR Medical Education,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
10, С. e63430 - e63430
Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2024
Abstract
Background
Recent
studies,
including
those
by
the
National
Board
of
Medical
Examiners,
have
highlighted
remarkable
capabilities
recent
large
language
models
(LLMs)
such
as
ChatGPT
in
passing
United
States
Licensing
Examination
(USMLE).
However,
there
is
a
gap
detailed
analysis
LLM
performance
specific
medical
content
areas,
thus
limiting
an
assessment
their
potential
utility
education.
Objective
This
study
aimed
to
assess
and
compare
accuracy
successive
versions
(GPT-3.5,
GPT-4,
GPT-4
Omni)
USMLE
disciplines,
clinical
clerkships,
skills
diagnostics
management.
Methods
used
750
vignette-based
multiple-choice
questions
characterize
(ChatGPT
3.5
[GPT-3.5],
4
[GPT-4],
Omni
[GPT-4o])
across
(diagnostics
management).
Accuracy
was
assessed
using
standardized
protocol,
with
statistical
analyses
conducted
models’
performances.
Results
GPT-4o
achieved
highest
at
90.4%,
outperforming
GPT-3.5,
which
scored
81.1%
60.0%,
respectively.
GPT-4o’s
performances
were
social
sciences
(95.5%),
behavioral
neuroscience
(94.2%),
pharmacology
(93.2%).
In
skills,
diagnostic
92.7%
management
88.8%,
significantly
higher
than
its
predecessors.
Notably,
both
outperformed
student
average
59.3%
(95%
CI
58.3‐60.3).
Conclusions
indicates
substantial
improvements
over
predecessors,
suggesting
significant
for
use
this
technology
educational
aid
students.
These
findings
underscore
need
careful
consideration
when
integrating
LLMs
into
education,
emphasizing
importance
structured
curricula
guide
appropriate
ongoing
critical
ensure
reliability
effectiveness.
Journal of Personalized Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(6), С. 612 - 612
Опубликована: Июнь 8, 2024
In
the
U.S.,
diagnostic
errors
are
common
across
various
healthcare
settings
due
to
factors
like
complex
procedures
and
multiple
providers,
often
exacerbated
by
inadequate
initial
evaluations.
This
study
explores
role
of
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs),
specifically
OpenAI’s
ChatGPT-4
Google
Gemini,
in
improving
emergency
decision-making
plastic
reconstructive
surgery
evaluating
their
effectiveness
both
with
without
physical
examination
data.
Thirty
medical
vignettes
covering
conditions
such
as
fractures
nerve
injuries
were
used
assess
management
responses
models.
These
evaluated
professionals
against
established
clinical
guidelines,
using
statistical
analyses
including
Wilcoxon
rank-sum
test.
Results
showed
that
consistently
outperformed
Gemini
diagnosis
management,
irrespective
presence
data,
though
no
significant
differences
noted
within
each
model’s
performance
different
data
scenarios.
Conclusively,
while
demonstrates
superior
accuracy
capabilities,
addition
enhancing
response
detail,
did
not
significantly
surpass
traditional
resources.
underscores
utility
AI
supporting
decision-making,
particularly
scenarios
limited
suggesting
its
a
complement
to,
rather
than
replacement
for,
comprehensive
evaluation
expertise.