Team Affective Climate Toward Disability as a Facilitator of Job Inclusion of Employees With Disabilities: Examining Mediational Paths
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 4, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
integration
of
employees
with
disabilities
in
the
workplace
is
a
critical
issue
for
organizations
aiming
to
foster
inclusivity
and
diversity.
purpose
this
study
was
examine
how
team
affective
climate
toward
disability
influences
job
inclusion
disabilities.
Three
indicators
were
considered:
satisfaction,
commitment,
desire
stay
organization.
We
examined
three
mediating
mechanisms.
First,
role
team‐shared
stigma.
Second,
quality
within‐team
relationships.
Third,
mixed
meditational
path,
where
climate→team‐shared
stigma→relationships
quality→job
inclusion.
sample
composed
258
from
66
teams
included
15
organizations.
Each
an
employee
used
PROCESS
test
our
mediation
hypotheses.
Our
results
indicated
that
indirect
effect
teams'
followed
causal
chain
through
shared
stigma
Implications
theory,
research,
practice
based
on
findings
are
discussed.
Язык: Английский
Addressing the Diversity Paradox: A Resource‐Based View of DEI Best Practices
Sustainable Development,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 6, 2025
ABSTRACT
This
paper
explores
the
benefits
and
challenges
of
Diversity,
Equity
Inclusion
practices,
with
an
emphasis
on
their
relevance
to
UN's
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(#5
‘gender
equality’
#8
‘inclusive
economic
growth’).
While
effective
DEI
practices
are
linked
desirable
societal,
organisational
individual
outcomes
(e.g.,
sustainable
social,
environmental
development),
there
exists
a
‘diversity
paradox’,
where
implementation
policies
yields
mixed
or
contradictory
results.
Based
content
analysis
official
reports
websites
published
by
top
20
firms
in
Fair360's
2024
rankings,
this
study
identifies
26
resources
four
key
capabilities
that
underpin
best
potentially
avoid
diversity
paradox.
discusses
how
these
contribute
achieving
SDGs
#5
concludes
recommendations
for
future
research
(including
need
broader
data
sources,
quantitative
studies
context‐specific
analyses
better
understand
enhance
practices).
Язык: Английский