Ciencia policial:,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
183, С. 43 - 89
Опубликована: Дек. 31, 2024
Durante
la
obtención,
análisis
e
interpretación
de
las
pruebas
científico-forenses
en
un
procedimiento
judicial,
siempre
intervienen
los
sesgos
cognitivos.
Estos
afectan
a
decisiones
que
conducen
imposición
una
condena
puede
no
tener
nada
ver
con
verdad
lo
pasó
y
ser
todo
contrario
justa
se
pretende.
Hay
numerosos
estudios
describen
cognitivos,
cómo
actúan
sobre
expertos
inexpertos,
han
afectado
procedimientos
judiciales
dando
lugar
puesta
libertad
cientos
personas
sido
ingresados
prisión
injustamente.
Implementar
medidas
estandarizados
disminuyan
contribuir
el
precio
ha
pagar
por
error
judicial
sea
tan
alto.
Los
son
inconscientes
inherentes
al
humano,
conocer
sus
fuentes
su
origen
permite
entender
cuáles
factores
pueden
influir
tratan
esclarecer
solo
conocen
autor,
víctima
o
testigo
rara
vez
cuentan
misma
historia.
Es
posible
minimizar
efectos.
Existen
estrategias
evitar
influyan
expertos,
que,
hasta
hace
poco,
pensaba
eran
fruto
razonamiento
lógico,
científico
jurídico.
En
este
trabajo,
enumeran
muchas
literatura
científica
propone
para
conseguirlo,
orientadas
hacia
entorno
intervenir
todas
etapas
investigación
alcanzar
legitimidad
amparo
jurídico
deseado.
Resulta
muy
difícil
reunir
tantas
ciencias
sola,
forense,
aplicarla
teniendo
cuenta
psicológicos
del
individuo,
parecen
infinitos.
Forensic Science International,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
357, С. 111968 - 111968
Опубликована: Фев. 15, 2024
For
years,
forensic
science
has
been
criticized
for
its
lack
of
scientific
foundations,
explaining
methodological
drawbacks.
Notwithstanding
recommendations
to
upgrade
quality
management
and
counter
cognitive
biases,
the
ontology
trace
very
nature
amplified
by
decision
context
is
rarely
invoked
as
sources
inescapable
errors.
Understanding
what
(forensic)
could
even
reconcile
prescriptive
approach
descriptive
reality,
through
an
unexplored
pathway,
Peirce's
semiotics.
The
implementation
a
semiotic
line
arguments
concur
transparency
opinions
security
justice
purposes,
with
rich
potentialities
in
sight.
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
101, С. 102083 - 102083
Опубликована: Март 5, 2025
Forensic
psychiatry
plays
a
critical
role
in
legal
contexts
but
is
highly
susceptible
to
cognitive
biases
that
can
undermine
the
accuracy
and
objectivity
of
evaluations.
This
scoping
review,
guided
by
Arksey
O'Malley
framework,
aims
identify
analyze
within
forensic
psychiatric
practice
across
criminal,
civil,
testimonial
domains.
A
comprehensive
search
five
databases
yielded
7002
records,
with
24
studies
meeting
inclusion
criteria.
From
these
studies,
ten
distinct
were
identified,
most
frequently
discussed
being
gender
bias
(29.2
%),
allegiance
(20.8
confirmation
followed
hindsight,
cultural,
emotional
biases.
Most
focused
on
criminal
settings,
only
two
addressing
civil
contexts.
Among
mitigation
strategies
reviewed,
structured
methodologies
"considering
opposite"
technique
positively
evaluated
widely
approaches.
Conversely,
self-awareness
strategy
was
criticized
for
its
limited
effectiveness
reducing
bias.
Emerging
tools,
such
as
artificial
intelligence,
offer
potential
solutions
require
robust
ethical
safeguards
prevent
perpetuation
systemic
review
provides
overview
current
state
research
psychiatry,
underscoring
need
further
empirical
explore
their
prevalence,
mechanisms,
effective
greater
depth.
Forensic Science International Synergy,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
8, С. 100473 - 100473
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Workplace
stress
can
affect
forensic
experts'
job
satisfaction
and
performance,
which
holds
financial
other
implications
for
service
providers.
Therefore,
it
is
important
to
understand
manage
workplace
stress,
but
that
not
simple
or
straightforward.
This
paper
explores
as
a
human
factor
influences
expert
decision-making.
First,
we
identify
highlight
three
factors
mitigate
decisions
under
conditions:
nature
of
decision,
individual
differences,
context
decision.
Second,
situate
in
science
within
the
Challenge-Hindrance
Stressor
Framework.
We
argue
stressors
workplaces
have
positive
negative
impact,
depending
on
type,
level,
stress.
Developing
an
understanding
stressors,
their
sources,
possible
impact
help
providers
researchers
implement
context-specific
interventions
at
work
optimize
performance.
Forensic Science International Mind and Law,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
4, С. 100125 - 100125
Опубликована: Ноя. 22, 2023
Stress
has
been
shown
to
have
an
impact
on
the
quality
of
decisions
made
by
professionals
in
a
variety
domains.
However,
there
is
lack
research
examining
stress
forensic
decision-making
contexts,
where
experts
can
face
various
levels
stress.
This
exploratory
study
examines
fingerprint
under
stress,
novices
(N
=
115)
and
34).
Findings
suggested
potentially
complex
relationship
between
expert
performance.
On
one
hand,
this
seemed
improve
performance
both
assessments,
but
mainly
for
same-source
evidence.
In
contrast,
induced
appeared
risk-taking.
When
prints
were
difficult,
trend
emerged
with
stressed
taking
less
risk
reported
more
inconclusive
conclusions
higher
confidence
than
control
group.
Furthermore,
had
significant
overall
response
times
novices,
not
experts.
These
findings
suggest
that
tasks
are
important
factors
should
be
considered
when
considering
optimal
working
environments
increasing
decision
quality.
Dialogo,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
10(1), С. 83 - 90
Опубликована: Ноя. 27, 2023
Artificial
intelligence
(AI)
is
poised
to
revolutionize
forensic
science
by
enhancing
evidence
analysis
and
aiding
in
crime-solving.
This
paper
explores
AI
applications
fields,
focusing
on
DNA
mixture
analysis,
the
cause
of
death
diagnosis,
challenges
faces
science.
It
addresses
limitations
science,
emphasizing
necessity
for
transparent
systems
used
ethically.
Forensic
errors
are
often
not
due
misclassification
scientists
but
stem
from
incompetence,
fraud,
weak
scientific
foundations,
or
organizational
deficiencies,
resulting
wrongful
convictions.
Systemic
issues
like
dependence
presumptive
tests
inadequate
defense
contribute
errors.
Inconsistencies
plague
various
domains
including
fingerprint
analysis.
Establishing
standardized
analytical
procedures
can
enhance
consistency
credibility
anthropology,
pathology,
genetics,
statistics
explored,
with
a
focus
their
potential
challenges.
Workplace
stress
can
affect
forensic
experts'
job
satisfaction
and
performance,
which
holds
financial
other
implications
for
service
providers.
Therefore,
it
is
important
to
understand
manage
workplace
stress,
but
that
not
simple
or
straightforward.
This
paper
explores
as
a
human
factor
influences
expert
decision-making.
First,
we
identify
highlight
three
factors
mitigate
decisions
under
conditions:
decision
parameters,
internal
factors,
external
factors.
Second,
situate
in
science
within
the
Challenge-Hindrance
Stress
Framework.
We
argue
stressors
workplaces
have
positive
negative
impact,
depending
on
type,
level,
context
of
stress.
Developing
an
understanding
stressors,
their
sources,
possible
help
providers
researchers
implement
context-specific
interventions
at
work
optimize
performance.
Advances in Health Sciences Education,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
29(5), С. 1749 - 1767
Опубликована: Апрель 23, 2024
Abstract
Introduction
Research
in
various
areas
indicates
that
expert
judgment
can
be
highly
inconsistent.
However,
is
indispensable
many
contexts.
In
medical
education,
experts
often
function
as
examiners
rater-based
assessments.
Here,
disagreement
between
have
far-reaching
consequences.
The
literature
suggests
inconsistencies
ratings
depend
on
the
level
of
performance
a
to-be-evaluated
candidate
shows.
This
possibility
has
not
been
addressed
deliberately
and
with
appropriate
statistical
methods.
By
adopting
theoretical
lens
ecological
rationality,
we
evaluate
if
easily
implementable
strategies
enhance
decision
making
real-world
assessment
Methods
We
address
two
objectives.
First,
investigate
dependence
rater-consistency
levels.
recorded
videos
mock-exams
had
(N=10)
four
students’
performances
compare
examiner-pairs
using
bootstrapping
procedure.
Our
second
objective
to
provide
an
approach
aids
by
implementing
simple
heuristics.
Results
found
discrepancies
were
largely
candidates
showed.
Lower
rated
more
inconsistently
than
excellent
performances.
Furthermore,
our
analyses
indicated
use
heuristics
might
improve
decisions
examiner
pairs.
Discussion
Inconsistencies
judgments
continue
matter
concern,
empirical
evidence
for
them
related
performance.
discuss
implications
research
advantages
perspective
rationality.
point
directions
both
further
development
practices.