Ciencia policial:,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
183, С. 43 - 89
Опубликована: Дек. 31, 2024
Durante
la
obtención,
análisis
e
interpretación
de
las
pruebas
científico-forenses
en
un
procedimiento
judicial,
siempre
intervienen
los
sesgos
cognitivos.
Estos
afectan
a
decisiones
que
conducen
imposición
una
condena
puede
no
tener
nada
ver
con
verdad
lo
pasó
y
ser
todo
contrario
justa
se
pretende.
Hay
numerosos
estudios
describen
cognitivos,
cómo
actúan
sobre
expertos
inexpertos,
han
afectado
procedimientos
judiciales
dando
lugar
puesta
libertad
cientos
personas
sido
ingresados
prisión
injustamente.
Implementar
medidas
estandarizados
disminuyan
contribuir
el
precio
ha
pagar
por
error
judicial
sea
tan
alto.
Los
son
inconscientes
inherentes
al
humano,
conocer
sus
fuentes
su
origen
permite
entender
cuáles
factores
pueden
influir
tratan
esclarecer
solo
conocen
autor,
víctima
o
testigo
rara
vez
cuentan
misma
historia.
Es
posible
minimizar
efectos.
Existen
estrategias
evitar
influyan
expertos,
que,
hasta
hace
poco,
pensaba
eran
fruto
razonamiento
lógico,
científico
jurídico.
En
este
trabajo,
enumeran
muchas
literatura
científica
propone
para
conseguirlo,
orientadas
hacia
entorno
intervenir
todas
etapas
investigación
alcanzar
legitimidad
amparo
jurídico
deseado.
Resulta
muy
difícil
reunir
tantas
ciencias
sola,
forense,
aplicarla
teniendo
cuenta
psicológicos
del
individuo,
parecen
infinitos.
Forensic
experts
make
important
decisions
to
address
legal
questions,
yet
there
is
now
ample
evidence
that
their
can
be
subjective
and
inconsistent.
This
commentary
suggests
elements
of
deliberate
practice
may
help
in
not
only
having
more
consistent
forensic
decisions,
but
also
towards
expected
accuracy.
Specifically,
four
practice:
(1)
setting
a
goal,
(2)
motivation,
(3)
feedback,
(4)
repetition
are
outlined
with
examples
for
addressing
issues
cognitive
bias
managing
stress
at
work.
If
any
these
missing,
such
as
delayed
or
no
then
suboptimal
improvement
experts’
decision-making
result.
tool
deliberately
improving
applicable
other
professionals;
thus,
potentially
driving
policies
enhancing
the
criminal
justice
system
broadly.
Forensic Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
4(2), С. 243 - 256
Опубликована: Июнь 5, 2024
Premortem
clinical
diagnoses
and
postmortem
autopsy
findings
do
not
match
historically.
These
clinicopathological
discrepancies
are
expected
to
be
higher
during
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
due
increased
pressure
on
healthcare.
At
same
time,
autopsies
accurately
display
quality
of
healthcare
system.
To
assess
that,
we
examined
relevant
works
literature
according
PRISMA-based
protocol.
As
a
discrepancy
rate
change-related
antemortem
scrutiny
medical
care
in
hospital,
also
checked
whether
studies
with
patients
from
intensive
unit
(ICU)
differed
significantly.
We
found
similar
overall
risk
differences
“pre-COVID”
“during
pandemic”
groups
studies.
Based
this,
concluded
that
did
drop
significantly
pandemic.
Be
as
it
may,
exposed
some
shortcomings
mortem
regarding
consensus
autopsy,
organ
retention,
burial,
postponed
burial
or
digitalization
All
these
issues
should
addressed
future.
Journal of Forensic Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
69(6), С. 2339 - 2341
Опубликована: Авг. 16, 2024
We
read
with
interest
the
article
by
Downing
NR,
et
al.
regarding
use
of
alternate
light
to
view
bruises
[1].
agree
authors
that
identification
injuries
in
patients
who
have
experienced
physical
violence
is
important.
As
colleagues
are
forensic
medicine
experts,
we
recognize
importance
visualizing
cases
interpersonal
violence,
especially
individuals
darkly
pigmented
skin,
so
applaud
your
research
on
this
issue.
Practitioners
need
be
as
accurate
possible
their
evaluation.
The
tools
assist
can
very
helpful.
also
sciences
and
associated
analysis
or
evaluation
must
remain
valid
not
utilize
"presumptive
tests
without
confirmation"
lacking
"reliability,
reproducibility,
repeatability,
replicability"
[2,
3].
When
reading
article,
were
struck
remarkable
similarity
methods
previous
publications
these
topic
[4,
5].
All
three
studies
same
number
157
participants.
This
study
published
2020
describe
methodology
"quota
sampling"
"recruit
equal
numbers
healthy
participants."
2022,
however,
stated
"a
convenience
sample
subjects"
was
obtained.
If
participants,
then
statement
2022
publication
about
how
participants
recruited
appears
incorrect
potentially
misleading.
concerned
multiple
analyzing
data
set
create
an
improper
opportunity
for
bias
post
hoc
error.
found
a
both
415
nm
ALS
yellow
filter
450
"optimal
detecting
evidence
bruising
known
trauma"
[5].
apparent
from
table
5
[4].
With
current
publication,
state
"only
415nm
viewed
through
resulted
clinically
meaningful
improvement
(0.46
points)
visibility
rating
when
compared
white
light."
[1]
In
figure
1,
study,
find
it
difficult
visually
discern
any
difference
between
various
frequencies
used
skin
dark
skin.
Additionally,
noted
all
modalities
had
reduced
visualization
bruises;
no
modality
clearly
better
most
color
categories.
Reviewing
2
recent
paper
shows
did
high
improvement,
but
only
other
assessment
above
0.2.
How
should
reader
what
score
would
be?
Based
upon
described
authors,
they
constructed
novel
bruise
absorption
using
visual
analog
scale
ranging
1
defined
labels
at
3,
5.
provide
discussion
determined
reliability,
validity,
accuracy
tool.
methods,
do
amount
believed
constitute
prior
analysis.
value
0.50
chosen
authors?
unable
tell
based
publication.
Using
value,
appear
concluded
12.5%
"clinically
improvement."
Their
change
within
starting
ending
represents
0.5
one-eighth
length
scale.
actual
calculated
(0.46),
11.5%
change,
own
statement,
result
"approaches
increase"
exceed
it.
Despite
observation
under
improvement;
believe
conclusion
incorrect,
supported
data.
Because
"bruise
score"
nor
"absorption
score";
comparison,
suggest
analogy
interpret
be.
Visual
pain
scores
scales
robust
history
medical
literature
[6].
For
scale,
minimum
important
ranges
around
10–20
mm
[7,
8].
These
values
represent
considered
significant
difference.
where
injury
present
location
being
viewed,
barely
achieved
range.
real
world,
patient
injury,
observed
ideal
will
too
low
useful.
conclusions,
increased
"could
corroborate
reduce
disparities
persons
colors."
Table
2,
show
tones
tones.
0.34,
significantly
lower
than
0.71
indicated
visualization.
see
presence
bruises,
since
bruises.
implications,
encourage
clinicians
"follow
guidelines"
AtLAST
[9].
note
guidelines
acknowledge
limitations
ALS.
"Whether
positive
negative
absorption,
findings
diagnostic
absence
injury."
Following
recommended
leads
question
if
has
utility
evaluating
bruising,
particularly
injury.
While
explicitly
paper,
seen
promulgated
tool
detect
normal
during
examination.
implication
clear
authors'
writing
say
"ALS
conjunction
patients'
report
trauma";
states
occurred
clinician
conclude
bruise.
unseen
invisible
been
declared
true
court
nurses
[10],
media
advocates,
notably
institution
some
[11].
AtLast
silent
whether
occult
(i.e.,
light),
latest
International
Association
Forensic
Nurses
may
"help
enhance
light"
[12].
firmly
reliably
accurately
which
light.
strongly
advocate
against
extreme
caution
applying
clinical
practice,
interpretation
injury's
great
legal
importance.
optimistic
minimally
Perhaps
small
validated
confirmation
control
group
does
blunt
different
Until
provided
confusing
examiner
able
better,
way,
environment
indicates
routinely
patients,
visible
observation.
Journal of Forensic Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
69(6), С. 1943 - 1947
Опубликована: Авг. 28, 2024
Forensic
examiners
make
important
decisions
to
address
legal
questions,
yet
there
is
now
ample
evidence
that
their
can
be
subjective
and
inconsistent.
This
commentary
suggests
elements
of
deliberate
practice
may
help
in
not
only
having
more
consistent
forensic
but
also
toward
expected
accuracy.
Specifically,
four
practice:
(1)
setting
a
goal,
(2)
motivation,
(3)
feedback,
(4)
repetition
are
outlined
with
examples
for
addressing
issues
cognitive
bias
managing
stress
at
work.
If
any
these
missing,
such
as
delayed
or
no
then
suboptimal
improvement
examiners'
decision-making
result.
tool
deliberately
improving
applicable
other
professionals;
thus,
potentially
driving
policies
enhance
the
criminal
justice
system
broadly.
Theory and Practice of Forensic Science,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19(3), С. 88 - 102
Опубликована: Окт. 26, 2024
In
connection
with
innovation
of
modern
biometric
technologies
in
various
spheres
life,
both
at
the
levels
individuals
and
State,
there
exists
an
increasing
risk
serious
negative
consequences
potentially
possible
mistaken
identifications.
Such
cases
already
happened
Russia
abroad.
course
legal
proceedings
on
facts
identity
its
consequences,
forensic
examinations
are
carried
out
most
cases.
Depending
type
registration
identification
system,
computer-technical,
traceological,
portrait,
video
technical
as
well
medical
examination
other
medicolegal
assigned.
The
article
gives
assessment
legality
scientific
validity
performing
anthropometric
photographs
recordings
suspects
captured
them.
The Saudi Journal of Forensic Medicine and Sciences,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
4(1), С. 1 - 3
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Abstract
The
practice
of
forensic
medicine
and
pathology,
as
other
specialties
that
are
based
on
cognitive
abilities,
is
greatly
impacted
by
bias.
In
this
article,
the
effects
bias
pathologists
emphasized
with
a
particular
focus
how
opinions
different
parts
death
report
might
be
distorted
irrelevant
information,
including
circumstances
death.
professionals
encouraged
to
use
structured
methods
for
making
decisions
give
weight
medically
pertinent
data
reduce
impact
unimportant
background
information.
article
promotes
development
frameworks
policies
training
programs
lessen
in
hope
improving
objectivity
dependability
findings.
Reducing
essential
maintaining
credibility
science
well
ensuring
people
treated
fairly
legal
system.
Ciencia policial:,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
183, С. 43 - 89
Опубликована: Дек. 31, 2024
Durante
la
obtención,
análisis
e
interpretación
de
las
pruebas
científico-forenses
en
un
procedimiento
judicial,
siempre
intervienen
los
sesgos
cognitivos.
Estos
afectan
a
decisiones
que
conducen
imposición
una
condena
puede
no
tener
nada
ver
con
verdad
lo
pasó
y
ser
todo
contrario
justa
se
pretende.
Hay
numerosos
estudios
describen
cognitivos,
cómo
actúan
sobre
expertos
inexpertos,
han
afectado
procedimientos
judiciales
dando
lugar
puesta
libertad
cientos
personas
sido
ingresados
prisión
injustamente.
Implementar
medidas
estandarizados
disminuyan
contribuir
el
precio
ha
pagar
por
error
judicial
sea
tan
alto.
Los
son
inconscientes
inherentes
al
humano,
conocer
sus
fuentes
su
origen
permite
entender
cuáles
factores
pueden
influir
tratan
esclarecer
solo
conocen
autor,
víctima
o
testigo
rara
vez
cuentan
misma
historia.
Es
posible
minimizar
efectos.
Existen
estrategias
evitar
influyan
expertos,
que,
hasta
hace
poco,
pensaba
eran
fruto
razonamiento
lógico,
científico
jurídico.
En
este
trabajo,
enumeran
muchas
literatura
científica
propone
para
conseguirlo,
orientadas
hacia
entorno
intervenir
todas
etapas
investigación
alcanzar
legitimidad
amparo
jurídico
deseado.
Resulta
muy
difícil
reunir
tantas
ciencias
sola,
forense,
aplicarla
teniendo
cuenta
psicológicos
del
individuo,
parecen
infinitos.