Comparison of Accuracy and Systematic Precision Between Autonomous Dental Robot and Static Guide: A Retrospective Study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 27(3)

Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2025

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to compare the implant placement accuracy and systematic precision between Robotic‐Assisted Implant Surgery (RAIS) Fully Guided Static Computer‐Assisted surgery (sCAIS), as well explore factors influencing accuracy. Materials Methods Patients who underwent digital guided October 2022 July 2024 were included in this study. The patients divided into RAIS sCAIS groups. Post‐operative CBCT scans performed measure three‐dimensional (3D) deviations overlap rate (OR) of each implant. differences 3D OR two CAIS methods analyzed, along with that could impact accuracy, such anterior versus posterior sites, maxilla mandible, bone defects, morphology, free‐end sites. Results 254 enrolled, 125 receiving 227 implants group 129 group. demonstrated significantly better performance than coronal global deviation (0.69 [0.52] mm vs. 0.97 [0.64] mm), apical (0.75 [0.57] 1.40 [0.82] angular (1.51 [1.43]° 3.44 [2.78]°), (80 [17]% 64 [20]%) ( p < 0.001). There no significant groups horizontal mesiodistal at nor buccolingual Conclusion In most edentulous cases, assisted by system was higher system. control Coronal (mesiodistal) is comparable RAIS. Additionally, precision.

Язык: Английский

---

Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study

Clinical Oral Investigations, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 28(9)

Опубликована: Сен. 5, 2024

Язык: Английский

---

Accuracy of robotic-assisted surgery for immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a retrospective case series

BMC Oral Health, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 24(1)

Опубликована: Окт. 22, 2024

Robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) is a revolutionary innovation in oral implantation; however, the clinical feasibility of r-CAIS for immediate placement (IIP) posterior teeth has not been verified. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate accuracy IIP tooth regions. Patients with be extracted and indicated undergo were evaluated. The patients had positioning markers installed cavity underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Subsequently, minimally invasive extractions performed, an individualised surgical plan was generated robotic software. After marker registration, implantation performed by arm under supervision assistance surgeons. Finally, deviations between planned placed implants evaluated based on preoperative postoperative CBCT data. A total 12 No adverse events occurred during surgery. mean global coronal, apical, angular 0.46 ± 0.15 mm (95%CI:0.36 0.56 mm), 0.14 (95%CI:0.37 0.54 1.05 0.55° (0.69 1.40°), respectively. Under limited conditions study, exhibited high Further multicentre randomised controlled studies are required confirm technology.

Язык: Английский

---

Accuracy and safety of implant placement with a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgical system: A translational research study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

---

Issue Information

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 26(2), С. 249 - 250

Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

---