3D surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation DOI Creative Commons
Leonardo Mancini, Shayan Barootchi, Miha Pirc

и другие.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Авг. 11, 2024

Abstract Aim A new, non‐invasive approach suggests using single intraoral optical scanning to analyze the ridge profile of single‐tooth gaps following alveolar preservation in absence a baseline scan. This method involves creating three‐dimensional (3D) surface map identify and assess contour changes profiles based on adjacent teeth. Materials Methods The present study was designed as cross‐sectional pilot analysis convenience sample patients undergoing preservation. Intraoral scans were taken 23 patients, capturing data from 30 edentulous sites. digital models then imported into an image software for 3D defect performed by one examiner. characterized buccolingual tooth gap relative 10 linear divergence points, spaced 0.5 mm apart corona‐apical direction, identified at midfacial aspect Based these points sites plotted grouped three different (linear, concave, convex). Clinical parameters including Keratinized mucosa Width (KMW), soft tissue phenotype with Colorvue biotype probes also recorded. Results Three patterns convex, concave) identified. Seven exhibited profile, displayed concave shape, 13 showed convex profile. had discrepancies similar neighboring In contrast, revealed mid‐buccal discrepancy localized only crestal aspect, while extended ranging 1 5 below margin. Univariate multiple logistic regression analyses did not reveal any statistically significant variables influencing profilometric analysis; however, when combining KMW, thick phenotypes demonstrated higher proportion concavity (OR = 4.83) compared thin ones, suggesting trend. With every increase probability showing decreased ( p 0.057). Conclusion represents useful tool objectively quantifying defects assessing differences dentition indicates that KMW may play critical role preventing defects. can guide decision‐making during augmentation procedures emphasizing specific location providing more detailed insights its localization. These enable tailoring flap management grafting strategies address patient's individual needs.

Язык: Английский

3D surface defect map for assessing buccolingual profile of single tooth gaps following alveolar ridge preservation DOI Creative Commons
Leonardo Mancini, Shayan Barootchi, Miha Pirc

и другие.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Авг. 11, 2024

Abstract Aim A new, non‐invasive approach suggests using single intraoral optical scanning to analyze the ridge profile of single‐tooth gaps following alveolar preservation in absence a baseline scan. This method involves creating three‐dimensional (3D) surface map identify and assess contour changes profiles based on adjacent teeth. Materials Methods The present study was designed as cross‐sectional pilot analysis convenience sample patients undergoing preservation. Intraoral scans were taken 23 patients, capturing data from 30 edentulous sites. digital models then imported into an image software for 3D defect performed by one examiner. characterized buccolingual tooth gap relative 10 linear divergence points, spaced 0.5 mm apart corona‐apical direction, identified at midfacial aspect Based these points sites plotted grouped three different (linear, concave, convex). Clinical parameters including Keratinized mucosa Width (KMW), soft tissue phenotype with Colorvue biotype probes also recorded. Results Three patterns convex, concave) identified. Seven exhibited profile, displayed concave shape, 13 showed convex profile. had discrepancies similar neighboring In contrast, revealed mid‐buccal discrepancy localized only crestal aspect, while extended ranging 1 5 below margin. Univariate multiple logistic regression analyses did not reveal any statistically significant variables influencing profilometric analysis; however, when combining KMW, thick phenotypes demonstrated higher proportion concavity (OR = 4.83) compared thin ones, suggesting trend. With every increase probability showing decreased ( p 0.057). Conclusion represents useful tool objectively quantifying defects assessing differences dentition indicates that KMW may play critical role preventing defects. can guide decision‐making during augmentation procedures emphasizing specific location providing more detailed insights its localization. These enable tailoring flap management grafting strategies address patient's individual needs.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1