Secondary effects of myPlaybook on college athletes’ avoidance of drinking games or pregaming as a protective behavior strategy: A multisite randomized controlled study

Social Science & Medicine, Год журнала: 2019, Номер 228, С. 135 - 141

Опубликована: Фев. 12, 2019

Язык: Английский

---

Alcohol and other substance use in a cross‐cultural perspective

Drug and Alcohol Review, Год журнала: 2017, Номер 36(6), С. 717 - 720

Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2017

In 1969, MacAndrew and Edgerton published their book Drunken Comportment 1 with it made a substantial contribution to cultural studies on alcohol. Their argument was that the behavioural effects of alcohol differ greatly from society society, they thereby put forth (and one could extend use other substances) are culturally as well pharmacologically determined. Since publication this seminal work, there has been growing interest among researchers in understanding diversity how relates substance use, which turn generated demand for cross-cultural comparative research studies. While is well-established nowadays shaped by interplay psychosocial factors characteristics, empirical evidence still rare. This regrettable since exchange increased tremendously over last decades due globalisation proliferation worldwide social media. Scholars recently argued 2 ‘further work diverse contexts needed better understand drinking cultures, interactions entanglement factors’ (p. 280). The authors further emphasise particular need outside European Anglophone countries explore micro- macro-level characteristics cultures. current Special Issue features series deal person-specific factors, but place them within wider usually takes place. Among determinants, motives, defined final decision drink or not, particularly important because proximal engaging drinking. Constituting pathway motives tend reflect more distal influences such personality aspects 3, 4. However, paper MacKinnon et al. 5 reveals high consistency motives; not only classification largely invariant also rank order endorsing certain kind (social > enhancement coping conformity) identical across young adults 10 countries. A similar result found concerning association between adverse consequences Wicki 6, includes adolescents different Further robustness stability comes unique study compared Brazilians who immigrated UK 2–11 years ago residing Brazil 7. results revealed former had higher percentage binge than latter no difference motives. It appears that, living another culture several years, people adapt behaviour consumption norms host country. cognitive driving forces appear be relatively resistant change perhaps deeply rooted origin. circumstance may explain why, hand, links alcohol-use patterns alcohol-related stable cultures while, strongly were endorsed. Young what classify individualistic (Switzerland, Hungary, Canada, Netherlands, Ireland, USA) endorsed positive reinforcement enhancement, i.e. together others get drunk) counterparts collectivistic (Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Spain). same 6 northern Europe (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Scotland Wales) middle southern (Belgium, Portugal, Slovakia Switzerland). previous study, we even demonstrated mediate link differences adolescent Taken together, psychological behind universal countries, is, terms ranking around globe. although all most have fun, when being (positive reinforcement), some pronounced can partly why frequently heavily. Similar pre-drinking consuming private before going out. Labhart 8 reported practiced 25 included common English-speaking Nordic often involves drinking, these consistent paragraph 5, 6. addition, indicates country's (measured prevalent each country) policy (here, ratio on- off-premise prices) affect individual practices, 8. Another example determinants impact parents peers exert, considerable focussing 9. here Creemers adds this, showing associations parental permissiveness affiliation alcohol-using adult generalise case both native immigrant youth Netherlands. generally less consumption, perceived lower permission proportions friends Dutch counterparts. That large 13- 15-year-olds 23 receiving coming 130 origin 11. argue values country origin, be—at least first generation immigrants—more those subculture easily Saw al 12 associated asserting preference smoke-free environments (e.g. wanting exposed tobacco smoke at home, workplace locations) Korean Chinese-American non-smokers USA. direct comparisons, however, Korean-Americans likely assert Chinese-Americans, after controlling various individual, family community factors. At glance, simply greater presence smoking Korean-American households. second keeping original language traditional much stronger assertiveness about Chinese-Americans. words, anti-smoking attitudes depend category remains connected always protective. When clash country, conflicts stress occur, along identity confusion, feelings rejection lack sense belonging, illustrated qualitative interviews Canfield Barsties 11 rates drunkenness sign immigration-related difficulties stressors, part parcel disadvantageous socio-economic situation. form demarcation related status. Studies indicate up wealthy rather poor families puts risk Comparing two levels income inequality, Sentenac 13 French Canadian adolescents, considering oneself off school family. Investigating 32 Gomes de Matos 14 wealthier highly educated. Thus, protection education offer undermined educated have. Socio-economic disparities poorer inequality. low position level makes if lives less-poor where wide access 14. indication personal affluence matters emerged Luczak 15. male drinkers Mauritius, hazardous men Tamil Hindu occupational educational differences. Being Muslim abstinence any pattern. occupation shared religion per se. insights respect come Sznitman 16 Israeli Arabs feeling drunk breath concentration Jews. taboo Arab make difficult Jews acknowledge them. Interestingly, remain present comparing Christians suggests beyond drunkenness. advance knowledge (mainly) every setting, someone drinks and/or hazardously pre-drinking, having permissive affiliating peers. Nevertheless, occur setting another. Preventive action targeting (i.e. motives) needed, Provision alternative sources stimulation, altering expectancies enhancing alcohol, promoting safer promising approaches show immigrants development either moderate into harmful patterns. Most developing common. integration means adopt frequent heavy norm immigrating to. On top potential resulting fuel urgently facilitate promotion special schools focusing apprenticeship communication customs. should integrate efforts prevent assimilation habits countries—or settings. samples 13, east Africa 15 clearly affordability plays role occurrence points importance price increases taxation, repeatedly shown effective public health measures 17, 18. emerging our (in factors) immigrants' connectedness example). areas violence, media marketing required complete picture. Moreover, populations ones Issue, older clinical samples. essential period life become 19. crucial degree intervention treatment readily applied would desirable longitudinal studies, follow, example, immigration adaptation process allow studying changes disentangling resistance) impacts traditions facilities acculturation example. like thank Prof. Paul Dietze Robin Room helpful comments improve work. None declared.

Язык: Английский

---

Where and What You Drink Is Linked to How Much You Drink: An Exploratory Survey of Alcohol Use in 17 Countries

Substance Use & Misuse, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 56(13), С. 1941 - 1950

Опубликована: Авг. 11, 2021

This paper aimed to explore the differences in subjective experiences of intoxication depending on drinking location and drink type. Methods: Data came from 32,194 respondents The Global Drug Survey (GDS) 2015, an annual, cross-sectional, online survey. Respondents selected their usual (home alone: home with partner/family: house parties: pubs/bars or clubs) (wine; beer/cider/lager; spirits alcopops/coolers). They indicated how many drinks they required reach three stages (feeling effects; ideal stage intoxication; tipping point) frequently reached each stage. Results: Drink type affected grams alcohol reported point: 109 gm wine, 127 alcopops, 133 beer, 134 spirts. who drank at alone, clubs point more compared other locations. Conclusions: Where people drink, amount different intoxication. Understanding why locations, types lead a need for greater consumption state drunkenness, such as social cues may enable reduce drinking.

Язык: Английский

---

Global comparisons of responses to alcohol health information labels: A cross sectional study of people who drink alcohol from 29 countries

Addictive Behaviors, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 131, С. 107330 - 107330

Опубликована: Апрель 12, 2022

Язык: Английский

---

A cross-national study of predrinking motives in Spain and the UK: Cross-sectional associations with risk-taking and alcohol consumption

Addictive Behaviors, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 141, С. 107641 - 107641

Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2023

This study contrasts young people's predrinking in two European cultural contexts: Spain and the UK. Whilst UK typically occurs amongst small groups of individuals who already know one another, distinctive Spanish context Botellón details a far larger gathering which participants may be less likely to each other. As such, motives drive consumption risk-taking expected vary between these cultures. An online questionnaire (N = 397; 167, 230) was used examine variety drinking behaviours associated beliefs/motivations including motivations, behaviour, risk taking. Path analysis analyse both direct indirect relationships measures with aim predicting problem alcohol most parsimonious model. Varying (in)direct paths were observed Most notably pointing towards inconsistency drivers adults' drinking, fun featured prominently among respondents predicted their reported (not so UK), while conviviality more prevalent motive sample case Spain). Further, (personal) risky behaviour samples, suggesting importance group norms activity, irrespective consumption. These findings highlight potential environment people predrink. Given shaping taking people, differences contexts warrant further investigation.

Язык: Английский

---