Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators
Journal of Perinatal Medicine,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 18, 2025
Abstract
Objectives
Perinatal
death
reviews
investigate
the
causes
of
perinatal
mortality,
identify
potentially
avoidable
factors,
and
may
help
prevent
further
deaths.
This
study
aimed
to
barriers
facilitators
implementation
a
standardised
mortality
review
tool
in
Irish
maternity
units
by
engaging
with
healthcare
professionals
about
their
opinions
on
existing
system
implementing
system.
Methods
involved
semi-structured
interviews
staff
from
three
various
sizes
Ireland.
Recruitment
purposive
snowball
sampling.
Interviews
took
place
May
December
2022
covered
topics
such
as
process,
experiences
proposed
changes
Thematic
analysis
was
performed.
Results
Participants
(n=32)
included
medical
midwifery
varying
levels
seniority
experience
reviews.
Four
themes
were
identified:
time
challenges
reviews,
institutional
culture
needs.
Our
findings
demonstrated
that
process
structured
differently
across
units,
involvement.
Institution
culture,
leadership
transparency
highlighted
essential
aspects
process.
Reviews
have
an
impact
wellbeing,
emphasising
need
for
continued
support.
Conclusions
Implementing
is
viewed
positively
staff,
though
addressing
change
important.
A
strengthen
provide
more
information
opportunity
involvement
bereaved
parents
reduce
future
Язык: Английский
Negative Emotions Experienced on the Occurrence of Medication Errors by Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Systematic Review
Journal of Clinical Nursing,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Апрель 4, 2025
This
study
aims
to
explore
the
negative
emotions
experienced
by
nurses
following
medication
errors.
Mixed-method
systematic
review.
A
search
was
conducted
in
PubMed,
Scopus,
Web
of
Science,
Cumulative
Index
Nursing
and
Allied
Health
Literature,
PsycINFO
Google
Scholar
for
studies
published
English
between
January
2013
October
2024.
The
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
critical
appraisal
tool
used
assess
article
quality
data
were
analysed
through
qualitative
content
analysis.
From
1619
screened
studies,
19
selected:
14
qualitative,
3
quantitative
2
mixed-method.
nurses,
as
second
victims
errors,
can
be
categorised
into
8
groups:
Fear,
anger,
disturbance,
sadness,
shame,
guilt,
low
self-esteem
depression.
Additionally,
11
types
fear
identified:
Fear
judgement,
disrespect,
losing
one's
job,
getting
scolded
contempt,
retaliation
punishment,
reaction,
consequences,
disciplinary
actions
lawsuits,
patient's
well-being,
reporting
a
error
patient's/their
families'
trust.
Furthermore,
two
shame
Internal
external
shame.
that
experience
persist
long
after
occurs.
It
underscores
need
structured
psychological
support
systems
foster
culture
'responsibility
without
blame'.
Addressing
nurses'
emotional
challenges
enhances
their
well-being
improves
global
healthcare
safety
quality.
These
findings
highlight
leaders
policymakers
implement
interventions
supportive,
non-punitive
workplace
with
aim
improving
adhered
PRISMA
guidelines.
None.
Prospero
code:
CRD42023439304.
Язык: Английский
Understanding the Second Victim Phenomenon Among Healthcare Workers in an Italian Hospital
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(12), С. 3073 - 3086
Опубликована: Дек. 16, 2024
Second
victim
syndrome
(SVS)
refers
to
the
psychological
trauma
experienced
by
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
as
a
result
of
being
involved
in
an
adverse
event
(AE).
Research
on
prevalence
SVS
and
support
needed
for
HCWs
who
experience
it
is
limited.
A
cross-sectional
study
was
conducted
at
Health
Local
Unit
Lecce,
Puglia,
identify
phenomenon
among
recognize
forms
received
desired.
validated
questionnaire,
IT-SVEST,
administered
doctors
nurses.
The
survey
responses
from
250
HCWs,
41%
respondents
reported
AE
that
could
cause
SVS.
Among
seven
dimensions
measuring
effects
two
outcome
variables,
highest
percentage
agreement
found
distress
(23.5%),
followed
turnover
intentions
(19.8%)
physical
(9.9%);
23.8%
interviewees
declared
they
did
not
receive
institutional
support,
9.9%
identified
help
resources
mostly
non-work-related
(9.9%),
supervisor
(9.3%).
multivariable
binary
logistic
regression
analysis
showed
positive
association
between
occurrence
medical
doctor
profession
(OR
=
4.267,
p
≤
0.0001),
affiliation
intensive
care
departments
5.133,
0.0001)
male
gender
2.069,
0.033).
serious
problem
affects
entire
health
system,
systematic
surveys
appropriate
including
formal
programs
affected
are
priority.
Язык: Английский
The Impacts of Second Victim Experiences on Nurses' Absenteeism and Intention to Leave: A Multi‐Site Cross‐Sectional Study
Journal of Advanced Nursing,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 23, 2024
ABSTRACT
Aim
Adverse
events
impact
patients
as
primary
victims
including
their
families,
while
healthcare
providers
are
impacted
second
victims.
These
incidents
have
serious
psychological
and
physical
impacts
on
providers'
quality
of
life
ability
to
execute
jobs.
As
no
studies
been
conducted
in
the
Middle
East
explore
experiences
among
nurses,
this
study
examined
relationship
between
nurses'
victim
experiences,
turnover
absenteeism.
Design
Descriptive,
correlational,
cross‐sectional
study.
Methods
A
convenience
sample
117
nurses
was
recruited
from
secondary‐
tertiary‐level
hospitals
across
13
regions
Saudi
Arabia.
The
Second
Victim
Experience
Support
Tool
used
assess
Results
trauma
affected
over
half
participants.
‘The
mental
weight
my
experience
is
exhausting’
‘My
colleagues
can
be
indifferent
these
situations
had
me’
obtained
highest
mean
scores.
Healthcare
who
stated
that
improved
care
were
found
lowest
significant
relationships
with
Further,
length
did
not
affect
absenteeism,
significantly
predicted
Additionally,
a
strong
observed
Overall,
those
greater
intention.
Conclusions
results
underscore
distress
endure,
increasing
likelihood
them
leaving
profession.
problems
worsened
by
inadequate
institutional
support,
emphasising
need
for
efforts
stabilise
avoid
unfavourable
organisational
outcomes.
Reporting
Method
adheres
STROBE
reporting
guidelines.
Patient
or
Public
Contribution
No
patient
public
contribution.
Язык: Английский