Accuracy of a Novel Robot‐Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study
Clinical Oral Implants Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 15, 2025
This
clinical
retrospective
study
aimed
to
compare
the
deviations
in
single-tooth
implant
placement
using
novel
semi-autonomous
robotic-assisted
surgery
system
(sa-RASS)
and
dynamic
navigation
(DNS)
methods.
A
analysis
of
medical
records
from
January
December
2023
was
conducted
implantation
accuracy
sa-RASS
DNS
partially
edentulous
patients
cone-beam
computed
tomography.
Platform,
apex,
angular
were
measured
analyzed.
The
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test
used
check
data
distribution,
along
with
t-tests
or
Mann-Whitney
U-tests,
where
appropriate.
Fifty-seven
(57
implants)
analyzed:
29
(29
group
28
(28
group.
comparison
platform,
deviation
between
0.91
±
0.46
mm
vs.
1.26
0.51
(p
<
0.001),
1.06
0.60
1.51
0.56
3.07°
1.66°
3.71°
1.64°
>
0.05),
respectively.
In
addition,
there
no
significant
difference
different
regions
(premolar,
molar,
maxilla,
mandible)
length
0.05).
present
study,
showed
better
positional
than
platform
apex
deviation,
although
these
improvements
may
have
limited
relevance,
suggesting
that
might
be
advantageous
dental
surgery.
ClinicalTrials.gov
identifier:
ChiCTR2400085089.
Язык: Английский
Surgical Protocol Affecting Robotic Implant Accuracy: Ex-vivo Study
Journal of Dentistry,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 105722 - 105722
Опубликована: Март 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Accuracy of Anterior Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Placement With an Autonomous Robotic System: A Retrospective Study
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
27(3)
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025
ABSTRACT
Objective
This
study
aimed
to
compare
the
accuracy
of
an
autonomous
robotic
system
for
anterior
immediate
and
delayed
implant
placement.
Methods
retrospective
included
patients
who
underwent
dental
surgery
from
September
2022
March
2025
using
system.
Osteotomies
performed
with
in
this
were
modified
by
precision
side‐cutting
drills,
along
repeated
lifting
drills
minimize
deviations.
Linear
angular
deviations
two‐
three‐dimensional
space
assessed
matching
preoperative
planning
postoperative
cone
beam
computed
tomography.
Postoperative
pain
surgical
satisfaction
recorded
a
100‐mm
visual
analog
scale.
The
Shapiro–Wilk
test,
Student's
t
‐test,
Mann–Whitney
U
Pearson's
Chi‐Square
Fisher's
exact
test
used,
p
<
0.05
was
considered
statistically
significant.
Results
53
(65
implants)
(immediate
placement
group:
19
patients,
21
implants;
34
44
implants).
Comparison
implantation
showed
mean
(±
SD)
coronal
deviation
0.57
±
0.19
mm
versus
0.49
0.20
(
=
0.129),
apical
0.52
0.21
0.373),
0.53°
0.18°
0.61°
0.28°
0.742).
not
significantly
different
between
two
groups
>
0.05).
Conclusions
demonstrated
high
comparable
both
implantation,
overall
patient
satisfaction.
could
reduce
technical
sensitivity
placement,
enhance
precision,
broaden
clinical
applications
Язык: Английский