Aktuelle Dermatologie,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
49(12), С. 546 - 547
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2023
Abrocitinib
hemmt
selektiv
die
Januskinase
1
(JAK-1)
und
ist
seit
2022
zur
Behandlung
der
mittelschweren
bis
schweren
atopischen
Dermatitis
zugelassen.
Da
für
randomisierten
Zulassungsstudien
üblicherweise
strenge
Ein-
Ausschlusskriterien
gelten,
untersuchte
ein
Forscherteam
aus
den
Niederlanden
nun
Effektivität
Sicherheit
des
Wirkstoffs
an
einem
tägliche
Praxis
repräsentativeren
Patientenkollektiv.
Dermatology and Therapy,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(4), С. 919 - 932
Опубликована: Март 21, 2024
Several
systemic
therapies
have
been
approved
for
the
treatment
of
severe
AD.
In
particular,
Janus
kinase
inhibitors
(JAKi),
including
abrocitinib,
baricitinib,
and
upadacitinib,
recently
received
approval
patients
with
AD
after
being
evaluated
in
several
clinical
trials.
However,
a
few
concerns
raised
regarding
their
long-term
safety
management
these
drugs
real-world
practice.
this
article
we
described
results
Delphi
consensus
aimed
at
describing
knowledge
on
JAKi
focusing,
providing
recommendations
dermatologists
daily
practice
use
drugs.
Twelve
Italian
reviewed
most
recent
literature
efficacy
profiles
proposed
24
statements.
Agreement
was
reached
statements
focusing
three
main
topics:
(1)
place
therapy
moderate-to-severe
AD;
(2)
effectiveness
JAK
different
phenotypes;
(3)
approaches
to
treated
The
panel
all
Given
wide
practice,
it
is
crucial
establish
specific
follow-up
each
patient's
phenotype
order
achieve
best
possible
outcome
minimize
potential
adverse
events.
Phase
3
trials
have
demonstrated
the
efficacy
and
safety
of
abrocitinib
for
atopic
dermatitis
(AD),
but
real-world
evidence
remains
limited.
This
study
prospectively
enrolled
117
moderate-to-severe
AD
patients
at
Huashan
Hospital,
Shanghai,
China.
Physician-
patient-reported
outcomes
were
evaluated
multiple
time
points.
Blood
eosinophil
counts,
serum
IgE,
24
cytokines/chemokines
measured.
Abrocitinib
treatment
led
to
rapid
potent
improvements
in
disease
severity.
At
week
12,
74.3%
50.5%
achieved
least
75%
90%
improvement
eczema
area
severity
index
(EASI),
respectively.
Compared
dupilumab,
showed
greater
Itch-NRS
2
a
higher
proportion
EASI-75
4.
Adverse
events
occurred
42.7%
patients,
with
gastrointestinal
symptoms
being
most
common
(17.1%).
No
tuberculosis
(TB)
reactivation
was
observed
who
screened
positive
TB
received
isoniazid
prophylaxis
during
period.
Lower
body
mass
(BMI
<
24;
adjusted
OR:
4.01,
95%
CI:
1.36-11.73)
no
prior
dupilumab
use
(adjusted
5.81,
1.8-18.7)
identified
as
predictors
good
response.
By
4,
blood
counts
IgE
significantly
decreased.
Reductions
Th2-,
Th1-,
Treg-related
after
4
weeks
treatment,
including
IL-5,
CCL17,
CCL18,
TNF-α,
IL-6,
IL-10,
CD25/IL-2Rα,
more
pronounced
responders.
robust
well-tolerated
profile
Chinese
routine
clinical
practice,
accompanied
by
normalization
elevated
biomarkers.
ChiCRT
Identifier:
ChiCTR2200063195.
Acta Dermato Venereologica,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
104, С. adv19454 - adv19454
Опубликована: Фев. 7, 2024
Limited
daily
practice
data
on
the
effect
of
abrocitinib
in
patients
with
atopic
dermatitis
are
available.
The
aim
this
multicentre
prospective
study
is
to
evaluate
effectiveness
and
safety
treated
practice.
In
a
subgroup,
hand
eczema
was
evaluated.
A
total
103
from
BioDay
registry
were
included
study:
week
4
(n
=
95),
16
61)
28
39).
At
28,
Eczema
Area
Severity
Index
(EASI)-50/75/90
achieved
by
81.8%,
57.6%,
18.2%,
respectively,
weekly
average
pruritus
numerical
rating
scale
≤
62.9%.
not
significantly
different
between
dupilumab
non-responders
dupilumab-naïve
patients/responders,
upadacitinib
upadacitinib-naïve
patients/responders.
Mean
±
standard
deviation
Hand
decreased
27.4
27.7
at
baseline
7.7
12.1
31).
Thirty-two
(31.1%)
discontinued
treatment
due
ineffectiveness
17),
adverse
events
9)
or
both
3).
most
frequently
reported
event
nausea
28).
conclusion,
an
effective
for
can
be
previous
inadequate
response
upadacitinib.
Furthermore,
improve
dermatitis.
Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
Volume 17, С. 593 - 604
Опубликована: Март 1, 2024
Upadacitinib
is
a
selective
Janus
kinase
inhibitor
approved
for
the
treatment
of
severe
atopic
dermatitis
(AD).
This
systematic
review
aims
to
summarize
most
recent
data
in
terms
effectiveness
and
safety
upadacitinib
AD
real-world
setting.
The
included
comprehensive
search
databases,
including
PubMed,
Google
Scholar
Web
Science,
according
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-analysis
(PRISMA)
guidelines.
literature
initially
identified
242
studies.
Of
these,
214
were
excluded
after
reviewing
their
titles
abstracts.
We
then
conducted
full-text
25
studies,
which
17
met
our
inclusion
criteria
therefore
review.
analysis
studies
showed
high
upadacitinib,
both
clinical
signs
subjective
symptoms,
different
patient
populations,
those
resistant
other
treatments.
No
new
significant
concerns
have
emerged
as
compared
randomized
trials.
Dermatology and Therapy,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(8), С. 1983 - 2038
Опубликована: Июль 16, 2024
The
risk
of
infections
associated
with
biological
drugs
(BD)
and
Janus
kinase
inhibitors
(JAKi)
has
been
extensively
explored
in
the
literature.
However,
there
is
a
dearth
studies
that
evaluate
both
pharmacological
groups
together
and,
furthermore,
compare
them.
Here,
we
review
BD
JAKi
used
dermatology.
International Journal of Dermatology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
63(11)
Опубликована: Июнь 21, 2024
Abstract
Background
Abrocitinib,
a
selective
JAK
1
inhibitor,
was
recently
approved
in
Europe.
Despite
its
approval,
real‐world
data
on
efficacy
and
safety
treating
moderate‐to‐severe
atopic
dermatitis
(AD)
remains
limited.
Objectives
This
study
aimed
to
evaluate
the
short‐term
effectiveness
of
abrocitinib
real‐life
setting
for
patients
with
AD.
Methods
We
conducted
retrospective
multicenter
involving
adult
AD
who
started
treatment
between
May
1,
2023,
September
30,
15
Spanish
hospitals.
Treatment
doses
were
100
or
200
mg
daily,
based
clinical
assessment.
Data
collection
included
patient
demographics,
history,
comorbidities,
previous
treatments,
disease
severity
indicators
such
as
SCORing
(SCORAD),
Eczema
Area
Severity
Index
(EASI),
body
surface
area,
Peak
Pruritus
NRS
scores
at
baseline,
4,
12,
24
weeks.
Quality
life
measured
using
Dermatology
Life
(DLQI),
assessed
by
monitoring
adverse
reactions
various
biochemical
parameters.
Results
The
cohort
comprised
76
an
average
age
33.93
years;
57.89%
male.
Before
abrocitinib,
36.84%
naïve
advanced
therapies.
baseline
mean
SCORAD
47.04,
EASI
21.79,
DLQI
15.01.
At
Week
24,
there
significant
improvements:
reduced
2.81,
70.58%
achieved
75.
However,
18.42%
discontinued
mainly
due
inefficacy
effects.
profile
favorable,
22.37%
reporting
mild
events
(AEs)
one
serious
case
cutaneous
lymphoma.
Conclusions
first
series
assessing
conditions
reveals
improvement
symptoms
quality
range
prior
failures.
Abrocitinib
well‐tolerated,
few
AEs,
highlighting
potential
effective
option
Acta Dermato Venereologica,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
105, С. adv41504 - adv41504
Опубликована: Март 9, 2025
In
recent
years,
several
new
systemic
agents
(biologics
and
Janus
kinase
inhibitors
[JAKi])
have
been
registered
for
the
treatment
of
moderate-to-severe
atopic
dermatitis
(AD).
However,
comparisons
real-world
drug
survival
data
insights
into
patterns
these
advanced
systemics
are
limited.
Data
from
a
prospective
observational
single-centre
registry
were
collected
549
adult
AD
patients
(759
courses)
receiving
biologics
(dupilumab,
tralokinumab)
or
JAKi
(abrocitinib,
baricitinib,
upadacitinib)
analysed
using
Kaplan–Meier
curves.
Cox
regression
analyses
used
to
evaluate
predictors
survival.
Frequencies
percentages
summarized
on
initial
subsequent
treatments
received,
with
Sankey
diagram
illustrating
switching
patterns.
The
18-month
overall
rates
dupilumab,
abrocitinib,
upadacitinib,
tralokinumab,
baricitinib
70.0%,
51.5%,
48.4%,
39.4%,
20.4%,
respectively.
No
significant
identified.
Dupilumab
was
predominant
(87.2%)
upadacitinib
most
frequently
second
third
treatment.
total
cohort,
57.9%
remained
their
26.8%
switched
other
treatments.
conclusion,
dupilumab
showed
superior
while
had
lowest
rate.
Frequent
highlights
need
biomarkers
that
predict
response
improve
attrition
rates.
Background:
Although
clinical
studies
have
demonstrated
the
effectiveness
and
safety
of
abrocitinib
for
moderate
to
severe
atopic
dermatitis
(AD),
real-world
evidences
are
limited.
In
particular,
exploring
impact
different
treatment
modes
on
prognosis
currently
lacking.
Objective:
This
study
aimed
investigate
effects
various
regimens
AD.
Methods:
A
retrospective
was
conducted
at
Southwest
Hospital
Army
Military
Medical
University
involved
patients
with
AD
receiving
abrocitinib.
After
disease
control,
were
given
option
continue,
taper,
or
discontinue
based
their
preferences.
Clinical
data
from
eligible
retrospectively
collected
between
August
2023
April
2024.
Results:
maintenance
group
(100
mg/day),
EASI-75,
pp-NRS4
achieved
by
33.3%
58.3%
patients,
respectively,
a
mean
reduction
12.8
points
in
Dermatology
Quality
Life
Index
(DLQI)
compared
baseline.
Patients
who
completed
12-week
induction
period
(including
both
tapering
groups)
showed
greater
improvement
SCORing
(P
<
0.0001;
P
=
0.0002),
Eczema
Area
Severity
Peak
Pruritus
Numerical
Rating
Scale
(all
0.0001),
DLQI
as
well
longer
time
relapse,
those
discontinuation
group.
Conclusion:
Continuous
completion
associated
improved
outcomes
reduced
relapse
rates
patients.