Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
68(1), С. 235 - 347
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022
Objectives:The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
compare
the
clinical
and
radiographic
outcomes
socket
shield
technique
(SST)
versus
conventional
for
immediate
implant
placement.
Material
Methods:Twenty
patients
who
reported
with
a
single
non-restorable
maxillary
tooth
in
esthetic
zone
were
included
randomly
assigned
one
two
groups:
Group
A:
(study
group)
comprising
SST
placement
B:
(control
placement.All
evaluated
clinically
radiographically
at
time,
after
3
months,
6
months
regarding
stability,
peri-implant
pocket
depth
(PPD),
modified
sulcus
bleeding
index
(mSBI),
marginal
bone
loss
(MBL).All
data
subjected
statistical
analysis.
Results:The
mean
vertical
0.399±0.093and
0.953±0.354mm
control
groups,
respectively.The
horizontal
0.322±0.066and
0.528±0.065mm
respectively.There
significant
difference
between
both
groups
loss.The
ISQ
group
significantly
increased
from
61.20±5.01
71.30±1.70,while
it
58.90±2.85
69.20±5.85
no
groups.There
mSBI
PPD.
Conclusion:The
is
alternative
minimally
invasive
procedure
preserve
buccal
improve
treatment
Implantet
imediate
moren
hov
rreth
viteve
1978.
Mbas
praktikave
eksperimentale
ne
kafshe
u
vu
re
se
kishte
sukses,
gjithashtu
dhe
studimet
klinike.
Testet
treguan
nje
integrim
te
mire
ketyre
implanteve.
Te
paret
njihen
mjeket
gjermane
me
Tubingen
implant.
Me
kalimin
e
be
rutine
vendosja
tyre
permiresim
siperfaqen
dizajnin
Sipas
studimeve
nga
autore
ndryshem
eshte
rritur
suksesi
i
implanteve
post
extrakive
91-97%
(pub
med.w.becker
British
Dental
Jornal).
Keto
implante
reduktojne
proceduren
kirurgjikale,
traumen,
stresin,
jane
pranueshem
per
pacientin.
Ne
kete
studim
pacientet
suportonin
faktin
qe
brenda
seance
kryenin
ekstaksionin
vendosjen
implantit.
126
raste
dokumentuara
osteointegrimi
ishte
shume
mire,
trauma
kirurgjikale
vogel.
Deshtime
pati
tre.
Impantet
postextraktive
alternative
duhet
mare
kosiderate
si
zgjidhje
po
perqafohet
gjithmone
shume.
Dental Hypotheses,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
13(3), С. 75 - 81
Опубликована: Июль 1, 2022
Objective:
To
compare
the
socket-shield
technique
(SST)
with
conventional
method
of
immediate
implant
placement
(IIP)
regarding
stabilization
buccal
hard
and
soft
tissue,
esthetic
management.
Method
Materials:
Randomized
controlled
trials
(RCT)
investigating
SST,
published
in
English,
were
searched
MEDLINE/PubMed,
Web
Science,
Scopus,
Cochrane,
ProQuest,
OpenGrey,
Embase
until
May
2021,
June
2021.
The
quality
assessment
included
RCTs
was
conducted
using
Cochrane
Collaboration’s
tools.
A
STATA
version
16
used
to
determine
mean
difference
95%
confidence
intervals
for
plate
width
(BPW),
height
(BPH),
pink
score
(PES),
stability
quotient
3,
6,
12
months
follow-up
subgroups.
Results:
Out
4617
records,
10
finally
review
meta-analysis.
Regarding
BPW,
significant
differences
observed
favor
SST
after
6
months.
Also
detected
BPH
PES
compared
all
time
points.
However,
no
found
between
two
groups.
Conclusion:
yields
better
outcomes
dimensional
changes
bone
is
be
superior
IIP
results
tissue
around
implants.
Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
24(3), С. e15455 - e15455
Опубликована: Март 8, 2024
Objective:
To
describe
the
clinical,
radiographic
and
tomographic
aspects,
as
well
complications,
success,
aesthetic
functional
results
of
an
implant
placed
using
“socket
shield”
technique.
Case
Details:
Represents
a
46-year-old
patient,
with
increased
mobility
crown
in
bucco-palatal
direction,
indication
for
extraction
replaced
by
immediate
implant.
Atraumatic
extraction,
socket
preservation
technique
placement
were
performed.
The
socket-shield
was
designed
placing
implants
to
protect
oral
bone
achieve
adequate
aesthetics.
buccal
fragment
tooth
kept
fixed
contact
fragment.
Cone
Bean
computed
tomography
showed
formation
aspect
1
year
later,
demonstrated
stability
peri-implant
tissue
replacement
root
remnant
bone.
clinical
appearance
maintenance
soft
tissues
good
aesthetics
without
gingival
retraction.
Final
considerations:
One-year
follow-up
shows
healing
healthy
tissue,
suggesting
that
can
be
excellent
alternative
preserving
vestibular
cortex
placement,
especially
area.
IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
10(3), С. 261 - 265
Опубликована: Авг. 15, 2024
Tooth
extraction
leads
to
continuous
bone
resorption
causing
the
collapsed
wall.
To
prevent
loss
and
buccal
wall
collapse
in
esthetic
areas
socket
shield
technique
was
developed.
Two
cases
of
delayed
implant
loading
immediately
placed
with
maxillary
anterior
premolar
region
a
follow-up
period
four
years
are
described.
After
years,
both
depicted
higher
survival
success
rates,
better
patient
satisfaction,
stability.
Implant-fixed
prosthetic
rehabilitation
non-restorable
tooth
using
can
be
one
conservative,
successful
durable
treatment
outcome
for
as
well
non-esthetic
zones.
MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
1(1), С. 21 - 24
Опубликована: Март 25, 2022
The
technique
with
socket
shield
is
used
like
not
total
extraction
therapy
which
based
on
preserving
segment
from
one
of
the
sides
root
tooth
that
going
to
be
extracted.
main
use
this
in
cases
for
implant
placement
combined
grafting
bone.
goal
preserve
as
much
possible
tissue
periodontal
ligament
and
also
spare
gingival
unnecessary
damaging
during
therapy.
Indications
are
:
1.
To
support
buccofacial
bone
part
require
immediate
implants.2.
Socket
indicated
vertical
fractures
teeth
without
any
pathology
pulpal
tissue,
where
sparing
attractive
look
a
goal.3.
papilla
between
placed
dental
implants.
In
spite
have
full
success
required
enough
will
allow
stability
future
absence
kind
infection.
advantages
application
many,
such
prevention
resorption
lamellar
bone,
high
aesthetics
results,
improved
primary
implant,
minimal
invasiveness
procedure,
forming
connective
low
cost
compared
other
procedures
etc.
There
disadvantages
possibility
displacement
buccal
purpose
study
analyze
efficiency
approach
treatment.
This
was
Narrative
review
published
surveys,
using
PubMed,
Medscape,
Webmd,
Mdconsult,
Emedicine
data
bases.
preservation
whole
attachment
apparatus
maintain
complete
alveolar
makes
very
good
results
level
efficiency.
clinical
outcomes
different
studies
believed
best
ridge
less
material
possible.
Medicinski pregled,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
74(11-12), С. 362 - 367
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2021
Introduction.
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
assess
the
buccal
bone
thickness
in
anterior
maxillary
and
mandibular
teeth
provide
information
important
during
immediate
implant
placement.
Material
Methods.
included
245
cone-beam
computed
tomography
scans.
measured
sagittal
plane
at
five
points
(M1
-
M5)
(2
mm
apart),
starting
2
from
cementoenamel
junction
coronal
apical
position
along
roots.
Results.
lowest
mean
observed
M1
point
all
both
jaws
while
highest
M4
(maxilla)
M5
(mandible).
An
increase
established
every
subsequent
measurement
perpendicular
long
axis
tooth
(p
<
0.001).
less
than
1
more
60%
maxilla
mandible
points.
A
statistically
significant
difference
relation
patients?
age
found
points,
except
=
0.456)
0.109).
Conclusion.
is
tends
a
Scientia Generalis,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
4(2), С. 316 - 325
Опубликована: Окт. 25, 2023
Oral
rehabilitation
has
advanced
a
lot
in
recent
years
aiming
at
the
health,
masticatory
function
and
aesthetics
of
patients.
This
literature
review
summarizes
current
knowledge
on
immediate
loading
healed
fresh
sockets
as
their
indications
for
clinical
practice.
From
interpretation
dental
scientific
data
relevant
to
topic,
it
can
be
said
that
there
is
evidence
regarding
application
time
period
suggest
protocols
demonstrate
high
implant
survival
rates
recommended
with
caution
certain
situations.
Immediate
had
similar
results
compared
conventional
used
successful
treatment,
advantages
such
reducing
treatment
providing
early
esthetics.
Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
68(1), С. 235 - 347
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022
Objectives:The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
compare
the
clinical
and
radiographic
outcomes
socket
shield
technique
(SST)
versus
conventional
for
immediate
implant
placement.
Material
Methods:Twenty
patients
who
reported
with
a
single
non-restorable
maxillary
tooth
in
esthetic
zone
were
included
randomly
assigned
one
two
groups:
Group
A:
(study
group)
comprising
SST
placement
B:
(control
placement.All
evaluated
clinically
radiographically
at
time,
after
3
months,
6
months
regarding
stability,
peri-implant
pocket
depth
(PPD),
modified
sulcus
bleeding
index
(mSBI),
marginal
bone
loss
(MBL).All
data
subjected
statistical
analysis.
Results:The
mean
vertical
0.399±0.093and
0.953±0.354mm
control
groups,
respectively.The
horizontal
0.322±0.066and
0.528±0.065mm
respectively.There
significant
difference
between
both
groups
loss.The
ISQ
group
significantly
increased
from
61.20±5.01
71.30±1.70,while
it
58.90±2.85
69.20±5.85
no
groups.There
mSBI
PPD.
Conclusion:The
is
alternative
minimally
invasive
procedure
preserve
buccal
improve
treatment
