Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
69(6), С. 1500 - 1507
Опубликована: Март 12, 2021
Abstract
Background
Health
systems
are
increasingly
implementing
interventions
to
reduce
older
patients'
use
of
low‐value
medications.
However,
prescribers'
perspectives
on
medication
value
and
the
acceptability
prescribing
poorly
understood.
Objective
To
identify
characteristics
that
affect
a
those
factors
influencing
from
perspective
primary
care
physicians.
Design
Qualitative
study
using
semi‐structured
interviews.
Setting
Academic
community
practices
within
University
Pittsburgh
Medical
Center
health
system.
Participants
Sixteen
Measurements
We
elicited
16
definitions
examples
in
adults,
incentivize
them
engage
such
prescribing,
would
make
less
likely
prescribing.
Results
identified
three
key
themes.
First,
prescribers
viewed
among
adults
as
common,
characterized
both
by
features
medications
themselves
particular
patients
whom
they
were
prescribed.
Second,
described
causes
multifactorial,
with
related
patients,
prescribers,
system
whole,
making
default
practice
pattern.
Third,
addressing
must
minimize
cognitive
load
time
pressures
common.
Interventions
increasing
pressure
or
load,
increased
documentation,
considered
acceptable.
Conclusions
Our
findings
demonstrate
is
well‐recognized
phenomenon,
consider
physicians'
address
specific
patient,
prescriber
practice.
Abstract
Polypharmacy,
commonly
defined
as
≥5
medications,
is
a
rising
public
health
concern
due
to
its
many
risks
of
harm.
One
recommended
strategy
address
polypharmacy
medication
reviews,
with
subsequent
deprescription
inappropriate
medications.
In
this
review,
we
explore
the
intersection
older
age,
polypharmacy,
and
deprescribing
in
contemporary
context
by
appraising
published
literature
(2012–2022)
identify
articles
that
included
new
primary
data
on
medications
patients
aged
≥65
years
currently
taking
We
found
31
were
which
describe
current
perceptions
clinicians
towards
deprescribing,
identified
barriers,
key
enabling
factors,
future
directions
approaching
deprescribing.
Currently,
believe
complex
process,
despite
majority
reporting
feeling
comfortable
fewer
engage
process
regularly.
Common
barriers
cited
include
lack
knowledge
training
around
time,
breakdown
communication,
perceived
‘abandonment
care’,
fear
adverse
consequences,
resistance
from
and/or
their
carers.
factors
recognition
opportunities
instigate
regular
improving
lines
education
both
multidisciplinary
approach
patient
care.
Addressing
requires
nuanced
generally
group
patients.
Key
strategies
reducing
clinicians,
addition
communication
between
healthcare
providers
approach.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Год журнала:
2019,
Номер
67(10), С. 2018 - 2022
Опубликована: Авг. 20, 2019
Polypharmacy
is
common
in
older
adults
and
associated
with
inappropriate
medication
use,
adverse
drug
events,
nonadherence,
higher
costs,
increased
mortality
compared
those
without
polypharmacy.
Deprescribing,
the
clinically
supervised
process
of
stopping
or
reducing
dose
medications
when
they
cause
harm
no
longer
provide
benefit,
may
improve
outcomes.
Although
potentially
beneficial,
clinicians
struggle
to
overcome
structural,
organizational,
technological,
cognitive
barriers
deprescribing,
limiting
its
use
clinical
practice.
Deprescribing
science
would
benefit
from
a
unifying
conceptual
framework
prioritize
research.
Current
deprescribing
frameworks
have
made
important
contributions
field
but
often
focus
on
specific
classes
aspects
deprescribing.
To
further
this
relatively
nascent
field,
we
developed
broader
that
builds
prior
includes
patient,
prescriber,
system
influences;
deprescribing;
outcomes;
dissemination.
Patient
factors
include
patients'
biology,
experience,
values,
preferences.
Prescriber
rational
(eg,
based
explicit
knowledge)
nonrational
behavioral
tendencies,
biases,
heuristics)
decision
making.
System
resources,
incentives,
goals,
culture
contribute
The
separates
.
captures
results
by
examining
changes
structures,
performance
processes,
patient
health
outcomes,
cost.
Through
testing
refinement,
novel,
more
comprehensive
has
potential
advance
research
organizing
existing
evidence,
identifying
evidence
gaps,
categorizing
interventions
settings
which
are
applied.
J
Am
Geriatr
Soc
67:2018–2022,
2019
Overtreatment
with
cardiometabolic
medication
in
older
patients
can
lead
to
major
adverse
events.
Timely
deprescribing
of
these
medications
is
therefore
essential.
Self-reported
willingness
stop
usually
high
among
people,
still
overtreatment
common
and
rarely
initiated.
An
important
barrier
for
reported
by
general
practitioners
the
patients'
unwillingness
medication.
More
insights
are
needed
into
influence
characteristics
on
their
attitudes
towards
differences
between
groups.A
survey
people
using
revised
Patients'
Attitudes
Towards
Deprescribing
(rPATD)
questionnaire
was
performed.
Participants
completed
rPATD
an
adapted
version
four
groups.
Linear
ordinal
logistic
regression
were
used
assess
age,
sex,
therapeutic
area
number
deprescribing.
Univariate
analysis
compare
sulfonylureas,
insulins,
antihypertensive
statins.Overall,
314
out
1143
invited
participants
(median
age
76
years,
54%
female).
Most
(80%)
satisfied
willing
if
doctor
said
it
possible
(88%).
Age,
sex
had
no
Taking
more
than
ten
medicines
significantly
associated
a
higher
perceived
burden.
Antihypertensive
insulin
considered
appropriate
statins,
sulfonylureas
not
favouring
deprescribing.The
majority
one
possible.
Health
care
providers
should
take
account
that
perceive
some
as
other
when
discussing
Abstract
Aim
The
aim
of
this
systematic
review
is
to
explore
the
attitudes
older
adults
(≥65
years
old)
and
their
carers
towards
de‐prescribing.
Methods
We
identified
relevant
studies
from
three
databases;
MEDLINE,
CINAHL
Web
Science.
Two
reviewers
(MS,
SS)
independently
extracted
data
each
selected
study
using
a
standardised
self‐developed
extraction
form.
Main
findings
were
summarised
descriptively.
Results
A
total
35
included
in
review.
Of
them,
19
questionnaire
studies,
11
semi‐structured
interviews,
4
focus
groups
1
used
nominal
group
technique
approach.
Most
willing
have
medication
de‐prescribed
if
told
do
so
by
healthcare
professional
(HCP).
Other
factors
that
increased
willingness
de‐prescribing
included;
trust
HCP,
side
effects
inconvenience
medications
as
well
prospect
follow‐up
monitoring
during
In
contrast,
perceived
effectiveness,
unawareness
lack
benefit,
negative
expectations
ageing
fear
preventing
Conclusion
De‐prescribing
an
important
concept
people
given
harm
associated
with
polypharmacy
age
group.
Overall,
are
facilitated
HCP.
However,
there
remain
few
barriers
which
may
need
be
addressed
certain
patients,
through
discussions
between
adults/their
allow
more
effective.
JAMA Network Open,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
5(2), С. e2148599 - e2148599
Опубликована: Фев. 15, 2022
Importance
Metrics
that
detect
low-value
care
in
common
forms
of
health
data,
such
as
administrative
claims
or
electronic
records,
primarily
focus
on
tests
and
procedures
but
not
medications,
representing
a
major
gap
the
ability
to
systematically
measure
prescribing.
Objective
To
develop
scalable
broadly
applicable
metric
contains
set
quality
indicators
(EVOLV-Rx)
for
use
data
reduce
prescribing
among
older
adults
is
informed
by
diverse
stakeholders'
perspectives.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
qualitative
study
used
an
online
modified-Delphi
method
convene
expert
panel
15
physicians
pharmacists.
panel,
comprising
clinicians,
system
leaders,
researchers,
was
tasked
with
rating
discussing
candidate
practices
were
derived
from
medication
safety
criteria;
peer-reviewed
literature;
studies
patient,
caregiver,
physician
The
RAND
ExpertLens
platform
conduct
activities
panel.
panelists
engaged
3
rounds
between
January
1
March
31,
2021.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Panelists
9-point
Likert
scale
rate
then
discuss
scientific
validity
clinical
usefulness
criteria
practices.
Candidate
rated
follows:
3,
indicating
low
usefulness;
3.5
6,
uncertain
6.5
9,
high
usefulness.
Agreement
degree
assessed
using
RAND/UCLA
(University
California,
Los
Angeles)
Appropriateness
Method.
Results
Of
527
recommendations
identified,
27
discrete
considered
inclusion
EVOLV-Rx.
After
round
1,
18
having
(scores
≥6.5).
2
deliberations,
19
revised.
met
criteria,
receiving
final
median
scores
higher
both
those
included
version
EVOLV-Rx,
received
≥6.5)
<6.5)
ratings,
whereas
6
<6.5).
Conclusions
Relevance
culminated
development
EVOLV-Rx
involved
experts
who
identified
most
salient
adults.
Applying
may
enhance
detection
practices,
polypharmacy,
enable
receive
high-value
across
full
spectrum
services.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19(6), С. e0305215 - e0305215
Опубликована: Июнь 17, 2024
Objective
The
growing
deprescribing
field
is
challenged
by
a
lack
of
consensus
around
evidence
and
knowledge
gaps.
objective
this
overview
systematic
reviews
was
to
summarize
the
review
for
interventions
in
older
adults.
Methods
11
databases
were
searched
from
1
st
January
2005
16
th
March
2023
identify
reviews.
We
summarized
synthesized
results
two
steps.
Step
reported
included
(including
meta-analyses).
2
involved
narrative
synthesis
outcome.
Outcomes
medication-related
outcomes
(
e
.
g
.,
medication
reduction,
appropriateness)
or
twelve
other
mortality,
adverse
events).
according
subgroups
(patient
characteristics,
intervention
type
setting)
when
direct
comparisons
available
within
quality
assessed
using
A
MeaSurement
Tool
Assess
Reviews
(AMSTAR
2).
Results
retrieved
3,228
unique
citations
135
full-text
articles
eligibility.
Forty-eight
(encompassing
17
meta-analyses)
included.
Thirty-one
48
had
general
focus,
focused
on
specific
classes
therapeutic
categories
one
both.
Twelve
meta-analyzed
(33
outcomes:
25
favored
intervention,
7
found
no
difference,
comparison).
indicated
that
most
resulted
some
reduction
while
we
primarily
an
effect.
mixed
events
few
drug
withdrawal
events.
Limited
information
people
with
dementia,
frailty
multimorbidity.
All
but
scored
low
critically
assessment.
Conclusion
Deprescribing
likely
outcomes,
particular
relating
events,
vulnerable
settings
limited.
Future
research
should
focus
designing
studies
powered
examine
harms,
patient-reported
effects
subgroups.
Systematic
Review
Registration
PROSPERO
CRD42020178860
European Geriatric Medicine,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Март 9, 2025
Abstract
Purpose
To
summarise
the
association
between
potentially
inappropriate
prescribing
(PIP)
and
health-related
quality
of
life
(HRQOL)
in
older
adults,
with
a
special
focus
on
those
atrial
fibrillation
(AF)
multimorbidity,
while
exploring
potential
interventions
to
improve
their
impact
HRQOL.
Methods
A
comprehensive
search
strategy
was
conducted
MEDLINE
using
PubMed
interface
August
16th,
2024,
focusing
key
terms
related
“potentially
prescribing”
“quality
life”.
Additionally,
reference
lists
included
studies
were
screened.
Only
utilising
validated
assessment
tools
for
HRQOL
or
measuring
global
self-perceived
health
status
considered.
Studies
involving
populations
an
average
age
≥
65
years
included.
Results
Of
1810
articles
screened,
35
The
findings
indicate
that
prescribing,
independent
polypharmacy,
may
negatively
influence
review
identified
range
aimed
at
improving
among
including
pharmacist-driven,
general
practitioner-driven,
multidisciplinary
approaches.
Interventions
assessed
distinct
population
groups
specifically
residential
care
homes.
While
some
demonstrated
improvements
quality,
overall
evidence
regarding
remains
limited.
Conclusion
relationship
underexplored
adults
AF
despite
high
prevalence
PIP.
Effective
pharmacotherapy
should
be
coupled
patients'
clinical
functional
parameters,
considering
Adopting
multidisciplinary,
integrated,
patient-centred
approach
is
essential
sustainable
appropriate
practices
enhance
BMJ Open,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(12), С. e061686 - e061686
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2022
To
synthesise
the
current
knowledge
on
barriers
and
facilitators
to
deprescribing
cardiovascular
medications
(CVMs)
at
levels
of
patients,
informal
caregivers
healthcare
providers
(HCPs).We
conducted
a
systematic
review
studies
exploring/assessing
patient,
caregiver
and/or
HCP
CVMs.Ovid/MEDLINE
Embase
from
January
2003
November
2021.We
performed
deductive
thematic
analysis
based
framework
specific
CVMs
created
by
Goyal
et
al.
We
added
quantification
occurrence
categories
themes
in
selected
articles
identify
resounding
that
indicate
greater
impetus
address
future
research.Most
frequent
for
HCPs
included
uncertainty
due
lack
evidence
regarding
CVM
(in
n=10
studies),
fear
negative
consequences
following
(n=13)
social
influences
(n=14).
A
frequently
reported
facilitator
deprescribing,
especially
patients
caregivers,
was
adverse
drug
events
(n=7).
Another
were
dislike
(n=9).
Necessity
benefit
seen
as
or
similarly
HCPs.The
differences
stress
need
ground
discussions
about
beliefs
preferences
each
stakeholder
implicated
decisions.
Furthermore,
highlights
provide
with
tools
enable
sharing
risks
benefits
ensure
safe
process.CRD42020221973.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
70(6), С. 1764 - 1773
Опубликована: Март 10, 2022
Abstract
Background
People
with
dementia
(PWD)
take
medications
that
may
be
unnecessary
or
harmful.
This
problem
can
addressed
through
deprescribing,
but
it
is
unclear
if
PWD
would
willing
to
engage
in
deprescribing
their
providers.
Our
goal
was
investigate
attitudes
toward
among
PWD.
Methods
a
cross‐sectional
study
of
422
aged
≥65
years
who
completed
the
module
National
Health
and
Aging
Trends
Study
(NHATS)
2016.
Proxies
provided
responses
when
participant
unable
respond
due
health
cognitive
problems.
Attitudinal
outcomes
comprised
two
statements
from
patients'
questionnaire
its
revised
version
(representing
belief
about
necessity
one's
willingness
deprescribe);
another
elicited
maximum
number
pills
respondent
comfortable
taking.
Results
The
weighted
sample
represented
over
1.8
million
PWD;
39%
were
75
84
old
38%
85
older,
60%
female,
55%
reported
six
more
regular
medications.
for
26%
Overall,
22%
believed
they
taking
one
medicines
no
longer
needed,
87%
stop
medications,
50%
uncomfortable
five
similar
across
sociodemographic
clinical
factors.
≥6
likely
endorse
at
least
medication
necessary
compared
those
<6
(adjusted
probability
29%
[95%
confidence
interval
(CI),
22%–38%]
vs.
13%
CI,
8%–20%];
p
=
0.004);
same
applied
deprescribe
(92%
87%–95%]
83%
76%–89%];
0.04).
Conclusions
A
majority
are
deprescribe,
representing
an
opportunity
improve
quality
life
this
vulnerable
population.