Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: A Comparison of 28 Advanced Democracies DOI
Clement Guitton,

Vlada Druta,

Markus Hinterleitner

и другие.

Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2025

Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been too little investigation into what drives the willingness of country present itself as adopting AI judiciary. In article, we show that mere promise efficiency gains not enough an explanation for claim within We administrative burden (as measured number days trial), government’s leaning political spectrum (namely towards left), and level adoption technology governments bordering neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement adopt their Together, our findings from data analysis 28 advanced democracies form theory respectively around functionality, politics, diffusion

Язык: Английский

Assessing and comparing the effects of public policies – a new approach DOI Creative Commons
Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín, Markus Hinterleitner, Christoph Knill

и другие.

Journal of European Public Policy, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 1 - 26

Опубликована: Янв. 22, 2025

Assessing the effects of public policies is essential for academic and practical reasons. While existing approaches focus on individual or entire sectoral policy regimes, that evaluate within context mixes are missing. This paper introduces a middle-ground approach called Conditional Effects Public Policies (CEPP) method. The CEPP uses Bayesian-based procedure to (1) capture all in specific area aimed at particular outcome (2) compare each policy's effect outcome. We demonstrate analytical value our 'Porter Hypothesis' order distinguish between environmental regulations hinder promote green innovations. Covering 21 OECD countries over two decades we show while no universally 'good' 'bad' this regard, investment programmes tend be driver innovation. Hierarchical instruments by contrast varied effects. Taken together, not only provides new method assess times increasingly congested spaces, but also makes clear contribution contested question research, namely, whether under which conditions can offer benefits regulated companies.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0
Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: A Comparison of 28 Advanced Democracies DOI
Clement Guitton,

Vlada Druta,

Markus Hinterleitner

и другие.

Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Апрель 24, 2025

Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been too little investigation into what drives the willingness of country present itself as adopting AI judiciary. In article, we show that mere promise efficiency gains not enough an explanation for claim within We administrative burden (as measured number days trial), government’s leaning political spectrum (namely towards left), and level adoption technology governments bordering neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement adopt their Together, our findings from data analysis 28 advanced democracies form theory respectively around functionality, politics, diffusion

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0