Comparison of auditory evoked potential thresholds in three shark species DOI Open Access
Carolin Nieder,

Jimmy Rapson,

John C. Montgomery

и другие.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 226(18)

Опубликована: Июль 13, 2023

Auditory sensitivity measurements have been published for only 12 of the more than 1150 extant species elasmobranchs (sharks, skates and rays). Thus, there is a need to further understand sound perception in from different ecological niches. In this study, auditory evoked potential (AEP) technique was used compare hearing abilities bottom-dwelling New Zealand carpet shark (Cephaloscyllium isabellum) two benthopelagic houndsharks (Triakidae), rig (Mustelus lenticulatus) school (Galeorhinus galeus). AEPs were measured response tone bursts (frequencies: 80, 100, 150, 200, 300, 450, 600, 800 1200 Hz) an underwater speaker positioned 55 cm front experimental tank. AEP detection thresholds derived visually statistically, with statistical measures slightly sensitive (∼4 dB) visual methodology. Hearing differed between species, mainly respect bandwidth rather sensitivity. least developed benthic C. isabellum [upper limit: 300 Hz, highest sensitivity: 100 Hz (82.3±1.5 dB re. 1 µm s-2)] had wider range sharks Hz; (79.2±1.6 s-2) G. galeus 150 (74.8±1.8 M. lenticulatus]. The data are consistent those known 'hearing non-specialist' teleost fishes that detect particle motion, not pressure. Furthermore, our results provide evidence exploit higher frequencies (max. some Hz). Further behavioural morphological studies needed identify what factors drive differences upper frequency limits elasmobranchs.

Язык: Английский

Taking the Animals’ Perspective Regarding Anthropogenic Underwater Sound DOI
Arthur N. Popper, A. D. Hawkins, Frank Thomsen

и другие.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 35(9), С. 787 - 794

Опубликована: Май 25, 2020

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

73

Offshore wind energy development: Research priorities for sound and vibration effects on fishes and aquatic invertebrates DOI Open Access
Arthur N. Popper,

Lyndie Hice-Dunton,

Edward Jenkins

и другие.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Год журнала: 2022, Номер 151(1), С. 205 - 215

Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2022

There are substantial knowledge gaps regarding both the bioacoustics and responses of animals to sounds associated with pre-construction, construction, operations offshore wind (OSW) energy development. A workgroup 2020 State Science Workshop on Wildlife Offshore Wind Energy identified studies for next five years help stakeholders better understand potential cumulative biological impacts sound vibration fishes aquatic invertebrates as OSW industry develops. The seven short-term priorities that include a mix primary research coordination efforts. Key needs examination animal displacement other behavioral sound, well hearing sensitivity related particle motion, substrate vibration, pressure. Other include: identification priority taxa which focus research; standardization methods; development long-term highly instrumented field site; mitigation options invertebrates. Effective assessment is currently precluded by these gaps. However, filling critical in will improve our understanding possible sound-related populations ecosystems.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

54

Acoustic Impacts of Offshore Wind Energy on Fishery Resources: An Evolving Source and Varied Effects Across a Wind Farm’s Lifetime DOI Creative Commons
T. Aran Mooney, Mathias H. Andersson, Jenni A. Stanley

и другие.

Oceanography, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 33(4), С. 82 - 95

Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2020

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

68

Fish hearing “specialization” – a re-evaluation DOI
Arthur N. Popper, A. D. Hawkins, Joseph A. Sisneros

и другие.

Hearing Research, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 425, С. 108393 - 108393

Опубликована: Ноя. 11, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

50

How to set sound exposure criteria for fishes DOI
A. D. Hawkins, Craig R. Johnson, Arthur N. Popper

и другие.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Год журнала: 2020, Номер 147(3), С. 1762 - 1777

Опубликована: Март 1, 2020

Underwater sounds from human sources can have detrimental effects upon aquatic animals, including fishes. Thus, it is important to establish sound exposure criteria for fishes, setting out those levels of different that them, in order support current and future protective regulations. This paper considers the gaps information must be resolved reasonable The vulnerability fishes affected by characteristics underwater sounds, which taken into account when evaluating effects. need considered include death injuries, physiological effects, changes behavior. Strong emphasis assessing has been placed hearing abilities However, although account, other actual also considered. filled development guidelines criteria.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

43

Fish hearing and how it is best determined DOI Open Access
Arthur N. Popper, A. D. Hawkins

ICES Journal of Marine Science, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 78(7), С. 2325 - 2336

Опубликована: Май 25, 2021

Abstract Hearing, as defined by numerous investigators of vertebrate hearing, involves not only detection a sound, but the ability to respond sound behaviourally. Thus, in order understand what fish (or any animal) hears, it is important use behavioural methods that allow an animal “tell investigator” which sounds are detected and not. However, since 1980’s, most studies suggest they measuring hearing have used electrophysiological approaches measure response ear or lower levels central auditory system sounds. In this paper, we argue these measures do represent indicate can potentially while provide some useful interesting insights into mechanisms, valid sensitivity, understanding (anthropogenic otherwise) able to, obtained using studies. We also must be done carefully designed acoustic setups so nature stimulus responds appropriate well understood.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

39

Acoustic particle motion detection in the snapping shrimp (Alpheus richardsoni) DOI
Jason P. Dinh, Craig A. Radford

Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 207(5), С. 641 - 655

Опубликована: Июль 9, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

33

Broad frequency sensitivity and complex neural coding in the larval zebrafish auditory system DOI Creative Commons
Rebecca Poulsen, Leandro A. Scholz, Lena Constantin

и другие.

Current Biology, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 31(9), С. 1977 - 1987.e4

Опубликована: Март 2, 2021

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

28

Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sound DOI
Klaus Lücke, Alexander O. MacGillivray, Michele B. Halvorsen

и другие.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 156(4), С. 2508 - 2526

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024

Metrics to be used in noise impact assessment must integrate the physical acoustic characteristics of sound field with relevant biology animals. Several metrics have been established determine and regulate underwater exposure aquatic fauna. However, recent advances understanding cause-effect relationships indicate that additional are needed fully describe quantify fields on Existing regulations primarily focused marine mammals based dichotomy types as being either impulsive or non-impulsive. This classification types, however, is overly simplistic insufficient for adequate assessments It recommended definition impulsiveness refined by incorporating kurtosis an parameter applying appropriate conversion factor. Auditory frequency weighting functions, which scale importance particular frequencies account animal's sensitivity those frequencies, should applied. Minimum phase filters calculating weighted pressure. Temporal observation windows reported signal duration influences its detectability Acknowledging auditory integration time differs across species dependent, standardized temporal proposed various types.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

4

Ocean acidification effects on fish hearing DOI Open Access
Craig A. Radford, Sinéad Collins, Philip L. Munday

и другие.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Год журнала: 2021, Номер 288(1946), С. 20202754 - 20202754

Опубликована: Март 3, 2021

Humans are rapidly changing the marine environment through a multitude of effects, including increased greenhouse gas emissions resulting in warmer and acidified oceans. Elevated CO 2 conditions can cause sensory deficits altered behaviours organisms, either directly by affecting end organ sensitivity or due to likely alterations brain chemistry. Previous studies show that auditory-associated larval juvenile fishes be affected elevated (1000 µatm). Here, using auditory evoked potentials (AEP) micro-computer tomography (microCT) we raising snapper, Chrysophyrs auratus , under predicted future resulted significant changes their hearing ability. Specifically, snapper raised had decrease low frequency (less than 200 Hz) sensitivity. MicroCT demonstrated these sacculus otolith's were significantly larger fluctuating asymmetry, which explains difference We suggest have dual effect on hearing, effecting organs altering previously described induced behaviours. This is first time been empirically linked modification anatomy fish Given widespread well-documented impact anatomy, predictions how life-history functions dependent may respond climate change need reassessed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

26