Science,
Год журнала:
2016,
Номер
351(6271), С. 388 - 391
Опубликована: Янв. 21, 2016
Ecological
intensification,
or
the
improvement
of
crop
yield
through
enhancement
biodiversity,
may
be
a
sustainable
pathway
toward
greater
food
supplies.
Such
increases
especially
important
for
2
billion
people
reliant
on
small
farms,
many
which
are
undernourished,
yet
we
know
little
about
efficacy
this
approach.
Using
coordinated
protocol
across
regions
and
crops,
quantify
to
what
degree
enhancing
pollinator
density
richness
can
improve
yields
344
fields
from
33
pollinator-dependent
systems
in
large
farms
Africa,
Asia,
Latin
America.
For
less
than
hectares,
found
that
gaps
could
closed
by
median
24%
higher
flower-visitor
density.
larger
fields,
such
benefits
only
occurred
at
high
richness.
Worldwide,
our
study
demonstrates
ecological
intensification
create
synchronous
biodiversity
outcomes.
Bees
are
subject
to
numerous
pressures
in
the
modern
world.
The
abundance
and
diversity
of
flowers
has
declined;
bees
chronically
exposed
cocktails
agrochemicals,
they
simultaneously
novel
parasites
accidentally
spread
by
humans.
Climate
change
is
likely
exacerbate
these
problems
future.
Stressors
do
not
act
isolation;
for
example,
pesticide
exposure
can
impair
both
detoxification
mechanisms
immune
responses,
rendering
more
susceptible
parasites.
It
seems
certain
that
chronic
multiple
interacting
stressors
driving
honey
bee
colony
losses
declines
wild
pollinators,
but
such
interactions
addressed
current
regulatory
procedures,
studying
experimentally
poses
a
major
challenge.
In
meantime,
taking
steps
reduce
stress
on
would
seem
prudent;
incorporating
flower-rich
habitat
into
farmland,
reducing
use
through
adopting
sustainable
farming
methods,
enforcing
effective
quarantine
measures
movements
all
practical
should
be
adopted.
Effective
monitoring
pollinator
populations
urgently
needed
inform
management
strategies
Nature Communications,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
6(1)
Опубликована: Июнь 16, 2015
Abstract
There
is
compelling
evidence
that
more
diverse
ecosystems
deliver
greater
benefits
to
people,
and
these
ecosystem
services
have
become
a
key
argument
for
biodiversity
conservation.
However,
it
unclear
how
much
needed
in
cost-effective
way.
Here
we
show
that,
while
the
contribution
of
wild
bees
crop
production
significant,
service
delivery
restricted
limited
subset
all
known
bee
species.
Across
crops,
years
biogeographical
regions,
crop-visiting
communities
are
dominated
by
small
number
common
species,
threatened
species
rarely
observed
on
crops.
Dominant
pollinators
persist
under
agricultural
expansion
many
easily
enhanced
simple
conservation
measures,
suggesting
management
strategies
promote
pollination
should
target
different
set
than
bees.
Conserving
biological
diversity
therefore
requires
just
ecosystem-service-based
arguments.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
113(1), С. 146 - 151
Опубликована: Ноя. 30, 2015
Significance
Many
of
the
world’s
crops
are
pollinated
by
insects,
and
bees
often
assumed
to
be
most
important
pollinators.
To
our
knowledge,
study
is
first
quantitative
evaluation
relative
contribution
non-bee
pollinators
global
pollinator-dependent
crops.
Across
39
studies
we
show
that
insects
other
than
efficient
providing
39%
visits
crop
flowers.
A
shift
in
perspective
from
a
bee-only
focus
needed
for
assessments
pollinator
biodiversity
economic
value
pollination.
These
should
also
consider
services
provided
types
such
as
flies,
wasps,
beetles,
butterflies—important
currently
overlooked.
Human
land
use
threatens
global
biodiversity
and
compromises
multiple
ecosystem
functions
critical
to
food
production.
Whether
crop
yield-related
services
can
be
maintained
by
a
few
dominant
species
or
rely
on
high
richness
remains
unclear.
Using
database
from
89
studies
(with
1475
locations),
we
partition
the
relative
importance
of
richness,
abundance,
dominance
for
pollination;
biological
pest
control;
final
yields
in
context
ongoing
land-use
change.
Pollinator
enemy
directly
supported
addition
independent
abundance
dominance.
Up
50%
negative
effects
landscape
simplification
was
due
losses
service-providing
organisms,
with
consequences
yields.
Maintaining
service
providers
is
therefore
vital
sustain
flow
key
agroecosystem
benefits
society.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Год журнала:
2018,
Номер
285(1870), С. 20172140 - 20172140
Опубликована: Янв. 10, 2018
The
western
honey
bee
(
Apis
mellifera
)
is
the
most
frequent
floral
visitor
of
crops
worldwide,
but
quantitative
knowledge
its
role
as
a
pollinator
outside
managed
habitats
largely
lacking.
Here
we
use
global
dataset
80
published
plant–pollinator
interaction
networks
well
effectiveness
measures
from
34
plant
species
to
assess
importance
A.
in
natural
habitats.
averaging
13%
visits
across
all
(range
0–85%),
with
5%
recorded
being
exclusively
visited
by
.
For
33%
and
49%
species,
however,
visitation
was
never
observed,
illustrating
that
many
flowering
taxa
assemblages
remain
dependent
on
non-
visitors
for
pollination.
higher
warmer,
less
variable
climates
mainland
rather
than
island
sites,
did
not
differ
between
native
introduced
ranges.
With
respect
single-visit
pollination
effectiveness,
average
visitor,
though
it
generally
effective
visitor.
Our
results
argue
deeper
understanding
how
,
potential
future
changes
range
abundance,
shape
ecology,
evolution,
conservation
plants,
pollinators,
their
interactions
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Год журнала:
2015,
Номер
282(1801), С. 20142620 - 20142620
Опубликована: Янв. 7, 2015
Drastic
biodiversity
declines
have
raised
concerns
about
the
deterioration
of
ecosystem
functions
and
motivated
much
recent
research
on
relationship
between
species
diversity
functioning.
A
functional
trait
framework
has
been
proposed
to
improve
mechanistic
understanding
this
relationship,
but
rarely
tested
for
organisms
other
than
plants.
We
analysed
eight
datasets,
including
five
animal
groups,
examine
how
well
a
trait-based
approach,
compared
with
more
traditional
taxonomic
predicts
seven
below-
above-ground.
Trait-based
indices
consistently
provided
greater
explanatory
power
richness
or
abundance.
The
frequency
distributions
single
multiple
traits
in
community
were
best
predictors
This
implies
that
we
investigated
underpinned
by
combination
identities
(i.e.
single-trait
indices)
complementarity
multi-trait
communities.
Our
study
provides
new
insights
into
general
mechanisms
link
functioning
natural
communities
suggests
observed
responses
due
identity
dominance
patterns
composition
rather
number
abundance
per
se
.