Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown, С. 73 - 106
Опубликована: Авг. 16, 2024
This
chapter
explores
the
transformative
potential
of
large
language
models
(LLMs)
and
vision
(LVMs)
in
healthcare.
These
technologies
can
comprehend
generate
human-like
text
interpret
complex
visual
information,
revolutionizing
healthcare
delivery.
Applications
include
medical
documentation,
clinical
decision
support,
imaging,
patient
education.
The
also
addresses
challenges
like
data
bias,
transparency,
privacy,
emphasizing
robust
frameworks
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
enhance
diagnostics,
personalize
treatments,
optimize
processes,
improve
efficiency,
addressing
global
health
disparities
promoting
equity.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 2, 2025
Large
Language
Model
(LLM)
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
tools
have
the
potential
to
streamline
healthcare
administration
by
enhancing
efficiency
in
document
drafting,
resource
allocation,
and
communication
tasks.
Despite
this
potential,
adoption
of
such
among
hospital
administrators
remains
understudied,
particularly
at
individual
level.
To
explore
factors
influencing
utilization
LLM
AI
China,
focusing
on
enablers,
barriers,
practical
applications
daily
administrative
A
multi-center,
cross-sectional,
descriptive
qualitative
design
was
employed.
Three
tertiary
hospitals
located
Beijing
(Site
1),
Shenzhen
2),
Chengdu
3)
were
selected
represent
diverse
geographic
regions
institutional
profiles.
Middle-level
recruited
using
purposive
sampling.
Data
collected
from
June
11
August
16,
2024
through
face-to-face
semi-structured
interviews
guided
a
collaboratively
developed
piloted
interview
guide.
Each
audio-recorded
transcribed
verbatim.
Colaizzi's
method
employed
for
thematic
analysis.
saturation
determined
per-site
basis
continuously
reviewing
transcripts
during
biweekly
meetings
until
no
new
themes
emerged
additional
interviews.
total
31
participants
1:
9;
Site
2:
10;
3:
12)
completed
lasting
an
average
27.3
min
(range:
21-39
min).
Only
22.6%
reported
high
familiarity
with
tools,
25.8%
frequent
users
while
45.2%
rare
users.
Adoption
varied
site.
3
had
highest
proportion
high-familiarity
who
consistently
used
more
frequently.
Qualitative
analysis
revealed
that
positive
early
experiences
prior
technological
expertise
facilitated
adoption,
whereas
mistrust
tool
accuracy,
limited
prompting
skills,
insufficient
training
significant
barriers.
Participants
predominantly
drafting
strongly
advocated
structured
tutorials
support
enhance
broader
utilization.
Familiarity
technology,
experiences,
openness
innovation
may
facilitate
barriers
as
knowledge,
skills
can
hinder
use.
are
now
primarily
basic
tasks
application
advanced
functionalities
due
lack
confidence.
Structured
needed
usability
integration.
Targeted
programs,
combined
organizational
strategies
build
trust
improve
accessibility,
could
rates
broaden
usage.
Future
quantitative
investigations
should
validate
rate
factors.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(4), С. 100085 - 100085
Опубликована: Июль 1, 2024
Large
language
models
(LLMs),
a
natural
processing
technology
based
on
deep
learning,
are
currently
in
the
spotlight.
These
closely
mimic
comprehension
and
generation.
Their
evolution
has
undergone
several
waves
of
innovation
similar
to
convolutional
neural
networks.
The
transformer
architecture
advancement
generative
artificial
intelligence
marks
monumental
leap
beyond
early-stage
pattern
recognition
via
supervised
learning.
With
expansion
parameters
training
data
(terabytes),
LLMs
unveil
remarkable
human
interactivity,
encompassing
capabilities
such
as
memory
retention
comprehension.
advances
make
particularly
well-suited
for
roles
healthcare
communication
between
medical
practitioners
patients.
In
this
comprehensive
review,
we
discuss
trajectory
their
potential
implications
clinicians
For
clinicians,
can
be
used
automated
documentation,
given
better
inputs
extensive
validation,
may
able
autonomously
diagnose
treat
future.
patient
care,
triage
suggestions,
summarization
documents,
explanation
patient's
condition,
customizing
education
materials
tailored
level.
limitations
possible
solutions
real-world
use
also
presented.
Given
rapid
advancements
area,
review
attempts
briefly
cover
many
that
play
ophthalmic
space,
with
focus
improving
quality
delivery.
Journal of Clinical Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(17), С. 5101 - 5101
Опубликована: Авг. 28, 2024
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs
have
the
potential
to
revolutionize
clinical
medicine
by
enhancing
healthcare
access,
diagnosis,
surgical
planning,
and
education.
However,
their
utilization
requires
careful,
prompt
engineering
mitigate
challenges
like
hallucinations
biases.
Proper
of
LLMs
involves
understanding
foundational
concepts
such
as
tokenization,
embeddings,
attention
mechanisms,
alongside
strategic
prompting
techniques
ensure
accurate
outputs.
For
innovative
solutions,
it
is
essential
maintain
ongoing
collaboration
between
AI
technology
medical
professionals.
Ethical
considerations,
including
data
security
bias
mitigation,
are
critical
application.
By
leveraging
supplementary
resources
in
research
education,
we
can
enhance
learning
support
knowledge-based
inquiries,
ultimately
advancing
quality
accessibility
care.
Continued
development
necessary
fully
realize
transforming
healthcare.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Ноя. 1, 2024
Abstract
Background
and
Aim
This
study
evaluates
the
diagnostic
performance
of
multimodal
large
language
models
(LLMs),
GPT-4o
Claude
Sonnet
3.5,
in
detecting
glaucoma
from
fundus
images.
We
specifically
assess
impact
prompt
engineering
use
reference
images
on
model
performance.
Methods
utilized
ACRIMA
public
dataset,
comprising
705
labeled
images,
designed
four
types,
ranging
simple
instructions
to
more
refined
prompts
with
The
two
were
tested
across
5640
API
runs,
accuracy,
sensitivity,
specificity,
PPV,
NPV
assessed
through
non-parametric
statistical
tests.
Results
3.5
achieved
a
highest
sensitivity
94.92%,
specificity
73.46%,
F1
score
0.726.
reached
81.47%,
50.49%,
0.645.
incorporation
improved
GPT-4o’s
accuracy
by
39.8%
3.5’s
64.2%,
significantly
enhancing
both
models’
Conclusion
Multimodal
LLMs
demonstrated
potential
diagnosing
glaucoma,
achieving
far
exceeding
22%
reported
for
primary
care
physicians
literature.
Prompt
engineering,
especially
As
become
integrated
into
medical
practice,
efficient
design
may
be
key,
training
doctors
these
tools
effectively
could
enhance
clinical
outcomes.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
84(1), С. 143 - 149
Опубликована: Сен. 19, 2024
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
assess
the
accuracy
and
readability
answers
generated
by
large
language
model
(LLM)-chatbots
common
patient
questions
about
low
back
pain
(LBP).
This
cross-sectional
analysed
responses
30
LBP-related
questions,
covering
self-management,
risk
factors
treatment.
were
developed
experienced
clinicians
researchers
piloted
with
a
group
consumer
representatives
lived
experience
LBP.
inquiries
inputted
in
prompt
form
into
ChatGPT
3.5,
Bing,
Bard
(Gemini)
4.0.
Responses
evaluated
relation
their
accuracy,
presence
disclaimers
health
advice.
assessed
comparing
recommendations
main
guidelines
for
two
independent
reviewers
classified
as
accurate,
inaccurate
or
unclear.
Readability
measured
Flesch
Reading
Ease
Score
(FRES).
Out
120
yielding
1069
recommendations,
55.8%
42.1%
1.9%
Treatment
self-management
domains
showed
highest
while
had
most
inaccuracies.
Overall,
LLM-chatbots
provided
that
'reasonably
difficult'
read,
mean
(SD)
FRES
score
50.94
(3.06).
Disclaimer
advice
present
around
70%-100%
produced.
use
tools
education
counselling
LBP
shows
promising
but
variable
results.
These
chatbots
generally
provide
moderately
accurate
recommendations.
However,
may
vary
depending
on
topic
each
question.
reliability
level
inadequate,
potentially
affecting
patient's
ability
comprehend
information.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
31(4)
Опубликована: Май 14, 2025
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Although
the
potential
utility
of
large
language
models
(LLMs)
in
medicine
and
healthcare
is
substantial,
no
assessment
has
been
made
to
date
how
GPs
want
LLMs
be
applied
primary
care,
or
which
issues
are
most
concerned
about
regarding
implementation
into
their
clinical
practice.
This
study's
objective
was
generate
preliminary
evidence
that
answers
these
questions,
relevant
because
themselves
will
ultimately
harness
power
care.
Methods
Non‐probability
sampling
utilised:
practicing
UK
who
were
members
one
two
Facebook
groups
(one
containing
a
community
care
staff,
other
GMC‐registered
doctors
UK)
invited
complete
an
online
survey,
ran
from
06
13
November
2024.
Results
The
survey
received
113
responses,
107
UK.
When
LLM
accuracy
safety
assumed
guaranteed,
broad
enthusiasm
for
carrying
out
various
nonclinical
tasks
reported.
single
task
respondents
supportive
listening
consultation
writing
notes
real‐time
GP
review,
edit,
save
(44.0%),
identifying
outstanding
actioning
them
(51.0%),
respectively.
Respondents
with
range
being
embedded
systems,
patient
commonly
reported
issue
concern
(36.2%).
Discussion
study
generated
those
developing
use
Further
research
required
expand
this
base
further
inform
development
technologies,
ensure
they
acceptable
them.
Evidence-Based Practice,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
28(1), С. 1 - 4
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Schrager,
Sarina
MD,
MS;
Seehusen,
Dean
A.
MPH;
Sexton,
Sumi
M.
MD;
Richardson,
Caroline
Neher,
Jon
Pimlott,
Nicholas
Bowman,
Marjorie
Rodíguez,
José
Morley,
Christopher
P.
PhD;
Li,
Li
PhD,
Dera,
James
Dom
MD
Author
Information
There
are
multiple
guidelines
from
publishers
and
organizations
on
the
use
of
artiXcial
intelligence
(AI)
in
publishing.However,
none
speciXc
to
family
medicine.Most
journals
have
some
basic
AI
recommendations
for
authors,
but
more
explicit
direction
is
needed,
as
not
all
tools
same.
Family Medicine and Community Health,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
13(1), С. e003238 - e003238
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
There
are
multiple
guidelines
from
publishers
and
organisations
on
the
use
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
publishing.[1–5][1]
However,
none
specific
to
family
medicine.
Most
journals
have
some
basic
AI
recommendations
for
authors,
but
more
explicit
direction
is
needed,
as
not
all