BMJ Quality & Safety,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
33(7), С. 470 - 478
Опубликована: Апрель 4, 2024
Mixed
methods
research
is
a
popular
approach
used
to
understand
persistent
and
complex
problems
related
quality
safety,
such
as
reasons
why
interventions
are
not
implemented
intended
or
explaining
differential
outcomes.
However,
the
rigour
of
mixed
proposals
publications
often
miss
opportunities
for
integration,
which
core
methods.
Achieving
integration
remains
challenging,
failing
integrate
reduces
benefits
approach.
Therefore,
purpose
this
article
guide
safety
researchers
in
planning
designing
study
that
facilitates
integration.
We
highlight
how
meaningful
can
be
achieved
by
centring
at
following
levels:
question,
design,
methods,
results
reporting
interpretation
levels.
A
holistic
view
through
all
these
levels
will
enable
provide
better
answers
thereby
contribute
improvement
care.
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Фев. 7, 2025
Abstract
Background
Despite
the
proven
effectiveness
of
infection
prevention
and
control
(IPC)
practices
in
reducing
healthcare-associated
infections
related
costs,
their
implementation
poses
a
challenge
neonatal
care
settings
across
high-income
(HICs)
low-
middle-income
countries
(LMICs).
While
existing
research
has
predominantly
focused
on
assessing
clinical
these
care,
aspects
concerning
remain
underexplored.
This
systematic
review
therefore
aimed
to
analyze
determinants
employed
strategies
for
implementing
IPC
inpatient
country
income
levels.
Methods
Following
targeted
search
seven
databases,
titles
abstracts
as
well
full
texts
were
screened
dual
process
identify
studies
focusing
reporting
and/or
strategies.
Implementation
synthesized
using
updated
Consolidated
Framework
Research.
coded
according
Expert
Recommendations
Implementing
Change
taxonomy.
A
convergent
integrated
approach
was
used
narratively
summarize
results
qualitative
quantitative
studies.
χ
2
Tests
Fisher’s
Exact
performed
differences
The
quality
included
assessed
Mixed
Appraisal
Tool.
Results
Out
6,426
records,
total
156
review.
Neonatal
units
LMICs
HICs
showed
general
commonalities
reported
determinants,
which
mainly
at
organizational
level.
educational
evaluative
iterative
most
frequently
support
both
HICs,
other
variance
Notably,
statistical
analyses
identified
significant
association
between
levels
respectively
(
$$\:\rho\:$$
<0.05).
Conclusion
this
underscore
importance
level
irrespective
However,
further
is
needed
understand
underlying
relationships
factors
dynamics
contributing
observed
practice
variances
HICs.
Registration
PROSPERO
(CRD42022380379).
JBI Evidence Implementation,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
21(1), С. 3 - 13
Опубликована: Дек. 22, 2022
In
this
paper,
we
provide
an
overview
of
JBI's
approach
to
evidence
implementation
and
describe
the
supporting
process
model
that
aligns
with
approach.
The
central
tenets
implementing
into
practice
include
use
evidence-based
audit
feedback,
identification
context
in
which
is
being
implemented,
facilitation
any
change,
evaluation
process.
A
pragmatic
practical
seven-phased
outlined
assist
'planning'
'doing'
getting
practice,
focusing
on
clinicians
as
change
agents
for
clinical
policy
settings.
Further
research
development
required
formally
evaluate
robustness
better
understand
complex
nature
implementation.
Implementation Science,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
17(1)
Опубликована: Дек. 12, 2022
Implementation
science
aims
to
accelerate
the
public
health
impact
of
evidence-based
interventions.
However,
implementation
has
had
too
little
focus
on
role
policy
-
and
its
inseparable
politics,
polity
structures,
policymakers
in
sustainment
healthcare.
Policies
can
serve
as
determinants,
strategies,
"thing"
be
implemented,
or
another
variable
causal
pathway
healthcare
access,
quality,
patient
outcomes.
Research
describing
roles
dissemination
(D&I)
efforts
is
needed
resolve
persistent
knowledge
gaps
about
policymakers'
evidence
use,
how
policies
are
implemented
sustained,
methods
de-implement
that
ineffective
cause
harm.
Few
D&I
theories,
models,
frameworks
(TMF)
explicitly
guide
researchers
conceptualizing
where,
how,
when
should
empirically
investigated.
We
conducted
reflected
results
a
scoping
review
identify
existing
Exploration,
Preparation,
Implementation,
Sustainment
(EPIS)
framework-guided
studies.
argue
rather
than
creating
new
TMF,
optimize
TMF
examine
policy's
D&I.
describe
six
recommendations
help
TMF.
Recommendations
applied
EPIS,
one
example
for
advancing
D&I.(1)
Specify
dimensions
function
(policy
goals,
type,
contexts,
capital
exchanged).
(2)
form
(origin,
structure,
dynamism,
outcomes).
(3)
Identify
define
nonlinear
phases
across
outer
inner
contexts.
(4)
Describe
temporal
stakeholders
play
over
time.
(5)
Consider
policy-relevant
context
adaptations.
(6)
bridging
factors
necessary
success.Researchers
use
meaningfully
conceptualize
practices
harmful
policies.
Applying
these
advances
theoretical
knowledge,
especially
EPIS
application,
introducing
models.
Using
will
sensitize
them
investigate
multifaceted
within
leading
success.
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
146, С. 102693 - 102693
Опубликована: Ноя. 2, 2023
Physical
disabilities
become
more
common
with
advancing
age.
Rehabilitation
restores
function,
maintaining
independence
for
longer.
However,
the
poor
availability
and
accessibility
of
rehabilitation
limits
its
clinical
impact.
Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)
guided
interventions
have
improved
many
domains
healthcare,
but
whether
can
benefit
from
AI
remains
unclear.
We
conducted
a
systematic
review
AI-supported
physical
technology
tested
in
setting
to
understand:
1)
technology;
2)
effect;
3)
barriers
facilitators
implementation.
searched
MEDLINE,
EMBASE,
CINAHL,
Science
Citation
Index
(Web
Science),
CIRRIE
(now
NARIC),
OpenGrey.
identified
9054
articles
included
28
projects.
solutions
spanned
five
categories:
App-based
systems,
robotic
devices
that
replace
restore
gaming
systems
wearables.
randomised
controlled
trials
(RCTs),
which
evaluated
outcomes
relating
activity,
pain,
health-related
quality
life.
The
effects
were
inconsistent.
Implementation
literacy,
reliability,
user
fatigue.
Enablers
greater
access
programmes,
remote
monitoring
progress,
reduction
manpower
requirements
lower
cost.
Applications
are
growing
field,
yet
be
studied
rigorously.
Developers
must
strive
conduct
robust
evaluations
real-world
appraise
post
implementation
experiences.
BMJ Open Quality,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
12(4), С. e002516 - e002516
Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2023
Patient-reported
outcome
measures
(PROMs)
and
patient-reported
experience
(PREMs)
show
the
results
of
healthcare
activities
as
rated
by
patients
others.
Patients
or
their
proxies
record
feedback
using
questionnaires.
These
can
enhance
quality
for
all
tailored
care
individuals.
This
paper
describes
obstacles
that
inhibit
widespread
use
PROMs
PREMs
some
potential
solutions.
Implementation
is
a
prerequisite
any
innovation
to
succeed.
Health
services
are
complex
people
need
be
engaged
at
every
level.
Most
cautious
about
proven
innovations
such
but
champions
leaders
help
them
engage.
The
NASSS
framework
(reasons
Non-adoption,
Abandonment
failure
Scale
up,
Spread
Sustain
digital
health
innovations)
helps
indicate
implementation
why
it
may
resisted.
Plan-Do-Study-Act
(PDSA)
approach
aids
ensure
everyone
knows
who
should
do
what,
when,
where,
how
why.
Noise
an
under-appreciated
problem,
especially
when
tracking
over
time
before
after
treatment.
Interoperability
with
electronic
records
Fast
Resources
internationally
accepted
coding
schemes
SNOMED
CT
LOINC.
projects
multiple
meet
needs
involved.
Measure
selection
focus
on
relevance,
ease
use,
response
rates.
If
these
problems
avoided
mitigated,
deliver
better
patient
outcomes,
experience,
staff
satisfaction
equity.
Implementation Science Communications,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
4(1)
Опубликована: Янв. 11, 2023
The
Consolidated
Framework
for
Implementation
Research
(CFIR)
is
a
determinant
framework
that
can
be
used
to
guide
context
assessment
prior
implementing
change.
Though
few
quantitative
measurement
instruments
have
been
developed
based
on
the
CFIR,
most
assessments
using
CFIR
relied
qualitative
methods.
One
challenge
translate
conceptual
constructs
which
are
often
described
highly
abstract,
technical
language
into
lay
clear,
concise,
and
meaningful.
purpose
of
this
paper
document
methods
develop
freely
available
pragmatic
tool
(pCAT).
pCAT
designed
frontline
quality
improvement
teams
as
an
abbreviated
local
facilitators
barriers
in
clinical
setting.Twenty-seven
interviews
Think
Aloud
method
(asking
participants
verbalize
thoughts
they
respond
questions)
were
conducted
with
employees
improve
pilot
version
pCAT.
Interviews
recorded
transcribed
verbatim;
guided
coding
analyses.Participants
identified
several
areas
where
needed
modified,
clarified,
or
allow
more
nuance
increase
usefulness
employees.
Participants
found
it
easier
questions
when
had
recent,
specific
project
mind.
Potential
tend
unique
each
improvement.
also
missing
concepts
conflated,
leading
refinements
made
understandable,
accurate,
useful.The
practical,
everyday
familiar
short
(14
items),
available,
does
not
require
research
expertise
experience.
It
draw
knowledge
individuals
their
own
context.
has
online
approximately
two
years
generated
relatively
high
level
interest
indicating
potential
tool.
PLOS Digital Health,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
3(5), С. e0000492 - e0000492
Опубликована: Май 2, 2024
Background
The
rapid
evolution
of
conversational
and
generative
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
led
to
the
increased
deployment
AI
tools
in
healthcare
settings.
While
these
promise
efficiency
expanded
access
services,
there
are
growing
concerns
ethically,
practically
terms
inclusivity.
This
study
aimed
identify
activities
which
reduce
bias
make
their
designs
implementation
more
equitable.
Methods
A
qualitative
research
approach
was
employed
develop
an
analytical
framework
based
on
content
analysis
17
guidelines
about
use
clinical
stakeholder
consultation
subsequently
conducted
with
a
total
33
ethnically
diverse
community
members,
designers,
industry
experts
relevant
health
professionals
further
roadmap
for
equitable
design
healthcare.
Framework
interview
data.
Results
10-stage
developed
outline
phases:
1)
Conception
planning,
2)
Diversity
collaboration,
3)
Preliminary
research,
4)
Co-production,
5)
Safety
measures,
6)
testing,
7)
Healthcare
integration,
8)
Service
evaluation
auditing,
9)
Maintenance,
10)
Termination.
Discussion
We
have
made
specific
recommendations
increase
AI’s
equity
as
part
services.
These
emphasise
importance
collaborative
involvement
patient
groups
navigating
technologies.
Further
must
assess
impact
recommended
chatbots’
fairness
ability
inequalities.