Regeneration, Regengrow and Tissue Repair in Animals: Evolution Indicates That No Regeneration Occurs in Terrestrial Environments but Only Recovery Healing DOI Creative Commons
Lorenzo Alibardi

Journal of Developmental Biology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(1), С. 2 - 2

Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2024

The present, brief review paper summarizes previous studies on a new interpretation of the presence and absence regeneration in invertebrates vertebrates. Broad is considered exclusive aquatic or amphibious animals with larval stages metamorphosis, where also patterning process activated for whole-body epimorphosis. In contrast, terrestrial vertebrates can only repair injury loss body parts through variable “recovery healing” tissues, regengrow scarring. This likely derives from change genomes during land adaptation, which included elimination intense metamorphosis. conditions are incompatible formation embryonic organs that necessary broad regeneration. fact, no organ survive desiccation, UV ROS exposition land, rapid reparative processes without patterning, such as recovery healing scarring, have replaced species. depends alteration developmental gene pathways sustaining occurred progenitor marine animals. Terrestrial stages, like those present insects among arthropods, metamorphose using small regions indicated imaginal disks, not large restructuring aquatic-related These reform appendages molting, regengrow, Most amniotes injuries scarring healing, occasionally contemporaneous conjunction somatic growth, forming sometimes heteromorphic organs.

Язык: Английский

Loss of the ability to regenerate body appendages in vertebrates: from side effects of evolutionary innovations to gene loss DOI
Andrey G. Zaraisky, Karina R. Araslanova,

Alexander D. Shitikov

и другие.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 99(5), С. 1868 - 1888

Опубликована: Май 30, 2024

ABSTRACT The ability to regenerate large body appendages is an ancestral trait of vertebrates, which varies across different animal groups. While anamniotes (fish and amphibians) commonly possess this ability, it notably restricted in amniotes (reptiles, birds, mammals). In review, we explore the factors contributing loss regenerative capabilities amniotes. First, analyse potential negative impacts on appendage regeneration caused by four evolutionary innovations: advanced immunity, skin keratinization, whole‐body endothermy, increased size. These innovations emerged as transitioned terrestrial habitats were correlated with a decline capability. Second, examine role played regeneration‐related enhancers genes initiated these fixation inability at genomic level. We propose that following cessation capacity, highly specific could represent evolutionarily neutral event. Consequently, such might promptly follow suppression side effect innovations. By contrast, genes, due their pleiotropic functions, would only take place if was accompanied additional compensated for functions unrelated regeneration, remain even after participation lost. Through review literature, provide evidence that, many cases, associated significantly delayed relative time when capability hypothesise delay may be attributed necessity restructuring developmental mechanisms create conditions where beneficial innovation organism. Experimental investigation downregulation involved but absent offers promising avenue uncover from genes. vast majority lost (about 150 humans) regulating early stages limb tail anamniotes. Disruption stage, rather than late not interfere bud development during embryogenesis, share similarities those operating stage regeneration. most approach restoring humans involve creating analogs embryonic buds using stem cell‐based tissue‐engineering methods, followed transfer amputation stump. Due required specifically more effective attempting induce both directly stump itself.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

The Change Rate of the Fbxl21 Gene and the Amino Acid Composition of Its Protein Correlate with the Species-Specific Lifespan in Placental Mammals DOI Creative Commons
Vassily Lyubetsky, Gregory A. Shilovsky, Jian‐Rong Yang

и другие.

Biology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(10), С. 792 - 792

Опубликована: Окт. 2, 2024

This article proposes a methodology for establishing relationship between the change rate of given gene (relative to taxon) together with amino acid composition proteins encoded by this and traits species containing gene. The is illustrated based on mammalian genes responsible regulating circadian rhythms that underlie number human disorders, particularly those associated aging. methods used are statistical bioinformatic ones. A systematic search orthologues, pseudogenes, losses was performed using our previously developed methods. It demonstrated least conserved Fbxl21 in Euarchontoglires superorder exhibits statistically significant connection genomic characteristics (the median dN/dS relative all other orthologous taxon, as well preference or avoidance certain acids its protein) species-specific lifespan body weight. In contrast, no such observed Laurasiatheria superorder. study goes beyond protein-coding genes, since accumulation substitutions course evolution leads pseudogenization even loss, although still preserved. proposed examples rhythm placental mammals, e.g., longevity connected change, specific (e.g., asparagine at 19th position CRY-binding domain) protein

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Dissecting the mystery of embryonic scaling: The Scalers Hypothesis and its confirmation in sea urchin embryos DOI

Polina S Timoshina,

Alexey M. Nesterenko,

Е. А. Паршина

и другие.

Cells and Development, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 203972 - 203972

Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Regeneration, Regengrow and Tissue Repair in Animals: Evolution Indicates That No Regeneration Occurs in Terrestrial Environments but Only Recovery Healing DOI Creative Commons
Lorenzo Alibardi

Journal of Developmental Biology, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(1), С. 2 - 2

Опубликована: Дек. 30, 2024

The present, brief review paper summarizes previous studies on a new interpretation of the presence and absence regeneration in invertebrates vertebrates. Broad is considered exclusive aquatic or amphibious animals with larval stages metamorphosis, where also patterning process activated for whole-body epimorphosis. In contrast, terrestrial vertebrates can only repair injury loss body parts through variable “recovery healing” tissues, regengrow scarring. This likely derives from change genomes during land adaptation, which included elimination intense metamorphosis. conditions are incompatible formation embryonic organs that necessary broad regeneration. fact, no organ survive desiccation, UV ROS exposition land, rapid reparative processes without patterning, such as recovery healing scarring, have replaced species. depends alteration developmental gene pathways sustaining occurred progenitor marine animals. Terrestrial stages, like those present insects among arthropods, metamorphose using small regions indicated imaginal disks, not large restructuring aquatic-related These reform appendages molting, regengrow, Most amniotes injuries scarring healing, occasionally contemporaneous conjunction somatic growth, forming sometimes heteromorphic organs.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0