Differences Between Online Trial Participants Who Have Used Statutory Mental Health Services and Those Who Have Not: Analysis of Baseline Data From 2 Pragmatic Trials of a Digital Health Intervention (Preprint) DOI
Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Chris Newby, Paul H. Robinson

и другие.

Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2022

BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are an established element of mental service provision internationally. Regulators have positioned the best practice standard evidence as interventional study with a comparator reflective care, often operationalized pragmatic trial. DHIs can extend to those not currently using services. Hence, for external validity, trials might openly recruit mixture people who used services and not. Prior research has demonstrated phenomenological differences in experience between these groups. Some users nonservice influence change created by DHIs; hence, should systematically examine inform intervention development evaluation work. This paper analyzes baseline data collected NEON (Narrative Experiences Online; ie, psychosis) NEON-O (NEON other [eg, nonpsychosis] problems) trials. These were DHI that recruited had specialist All participants experiencing distress. Trial experienced psychosis previous 5 years. OBJECTIVE aims identify sociodemographic clinical characteristics associated use participants. METHODS For both trials, hypothesis testing was compare intention-to-treat sample Bonferroni correction applied significance thresholds account multiple testing. RESULTS Significant identified Compared (124/739, 16.8%), (609/739, 82.4%) more likely be female (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), older White British lower quality life (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) status (<i>P</i>=.002). There geographical distribution employment (<i>P</i>&lt;.001; unemployment), current problems personality disorders), recovery recovered). Current than prior users. (399/1023, 39%), (614/1023, 60.02%) unemployment) distress less hope empowerment meaning (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS Mental history numerous characteristics. Investigators work develop evaluate populations mixed histories. CLINICALTRIAL

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1186/s13063-020-04428-6

Язык: Английский

Differences Between Online Trial Participants Who Have Used Statutory Mental Health Services and Those Who Have Not: Analysis of Baseline Data From 2 Pragmatic Trials of a Digital Health Intervention (Preprint) DOI
Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Chris Newby, Paul H. Robinson

и другие.

Опубликована: Ноя. 29, 2022

BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are an established element of mental service provision internationally. Regulators have positioned the best practice standard evidence as interventional study with a comparator reflective care, often operationalized pragmatic trial. DHIs can extend to those not currently using services. Hence, for external validity, trials might openly recruit mixture people who used services and not. Prior research has demonstrated phenomenological differences in experience between these groups. Some users nonservice influence change created by DHIs; hence, should systematically examine inform intervention development evaluation work. This paper analyzes baseline data collected NEON (Narrative Experiences Online; ie, psychosis) NEON-O (NEON other [eg, nonpsychosis] problems) trials. These were DHI that recruited had specialist All participants experiencing distress. Trial experienced psychosis previous 5 years. OBJECTIVE aims identify sociodemographic clinical characteristics associated use participants. METHODS For both trials, hypothesis testing was compare intention-to-treat sample Bonferroni correction applied significance thresholds account multiple testing. RESULTS Significant identified Compared (124/739, 16.8%), (609/739, 82.4%) more likely be female (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), older White British lower quality life (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) status (<i>P</i>=.002). There geographical distribution employment (<i>P</i>&lt;.001; unemployment), current problems personality disorders), recovery recovered). Current than prior users. (399/1023, 39%), (614/1023, 60.02%) unemployment) distress less hope empowerment meaning (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS Mental history numerous characteristics. Investigators work develop evaluate populations mixed histories. CLINICALTRIAL

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1186/s13063-020-04428-6

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0