Ege Tıp Dergisi,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
62(3), С. 364 - 375
Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2023
Aim:
Demonstrating
which
population
has
the
highest
anxiety
symptoms
and
its
predictors
is
important
for
coordination
of
psychiatric
care
services.
Hospitalized
patients
with
Covid-19
healthcare
professionals
caring
them
are
two
groups
risk
disorders
during
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic.
We
aimed
to
assess
state
trait
levels
simultaneously
in
same
ward
a
tertiary
center
hospital.
Materials
Methods:
Given
nature
this
observational
single-center
study,
purposive
sampling
all
staff
between
5-10
April
2020
was
planned.
The
data
collected
via
an
online
survey
using
“Sociodemographic
Form”
“State-Trait
Anxiety
Inventory
(STAI)”.
Results:
hospitalized
were
significantly
higher
than
workers
t-test
(p
=
.012)
however
resolved
regression
analysis
(β
.029,
t
.19,
p
.85).
Not
being
marital
bond
.035)
having
lifetime
disorder
.002)
anxiety;
older
age
.006),
female
.007)
associated
scores
ward.
Conclusion:
Having
common
item
both
patients,
doctors,
nurses
Covid
ward.
Psychiatrists
should
be
accessible
primarily
individuals
whom
they
evaluated
or
treated
before
European Psychiatry,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
67(1)
Опубликована: Дек. 13, 2023
Abstract
Background
To
assess
the
associations
between
anxiety
and
depressive
symptoms
post-COVID-19
condition
(PCC)
by
exploring
direction
of
these
their
relevance
in
definition
PCC.
Methods
Nationwide
survey
among
French
adults,
recruited
March
April,
2022,
using
a
quota
method
to
capture
representative
sample
general
population
with
regard
sex,
age,
socioeconomic
status,
size
place
residence,
region.
We
included
all
participants
who
met
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
PCC
addition
random
infected
SARS-COV-2
for
at
least
3
months
but
without
Self-reported
symptoms,
chronic
depression
(for
more
than
years),
were
measured
GAD-2
PHQ-2
questionnaires,
respectively.
Results
In
1,095
1,021
PCC,
21%
had
self-reported
18%
depression,
whereas
33%
20%
current
The
high
prevalence
cannot
only
be
explained
characterization
as
13.4%
7.6%
WHO
criteria
Only
one
participant
based
on
or
alone,
always
combined
other
patients
Chronic
associated
(aOR
1.27;
95%
CI:
1.00–1.61).
addition,
was
=
1.29;
1.02–1.62).
Conclusions
Pre-COVID-19
may
play
role
development
share
vulnerability
factors
it.
Our
results
challenge
inclusion
Journal of Affective Disorders,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
350, С. 332 - 339
Опубликована: Янв. 21, 2024
Although
hospitalisation
for
COVID-19
is
associated
with
a
higher
post-discharge
risk
of
mood
disorders,
including
major
depressive
disorder
(MDD)
and
bipolar
(BD),
this
has
not
been
compared
to
that
following
reason
other
than
COVID-19.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Май 30, 2024
Abstract
Borderline
personality
disorder
(BPD)
is
a
complex
psychopathology
associated
with
high
service
utilization
rates.
In
turn,
the
hospitalization
of
BPD
patients
controversial
challenge
for
mental
health
professionals.
Prior
literature
has
identified
certain
socio-demographic
factors
as
linked
to
an
increased
risk
BPD.
this
study,
we
examined
possible
connection
between
these
and
duration.
We
analyzed
1077
records
200
BPD-diagnosed
patients.
Patients’
gender,
age,
education
level,
employment
marital
statuses,
living
arrangement
were
statistically
significantly
Specifically,
female
age
twenty
or
below,
no
high-school
diploma
(or,
lesser
extent,
academic
education),
unemployment
status
and/or
who
live
parents
are
strongly
longer
hospitalizations
compared
male
older
patients,
more
educated,
married/divorced
those
do
not
their
parents.
Additionally,
results
point
weak,
albeit
significant,
temporal
pattern
advanced
generally
aligning
duration
preceding
ones,
while
being
slightly
shorter.
order
prevent
potentially
unnecessary
prolonged
regressive
hospitalizations,
estimation
expected
should
be
explicitly
considered
when
setting
goals
plans.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 10, 2024
ABSTRACT
Purpose
The
impact
on
the
labour
force,
including
healthcare
services,
from
emergence
of
mental
health
symptoms
after
COVID-19
is
uncertain.
This
rapid
review
examined
impacts
force
and
services
costs
related
to
issues
following
an
acute
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
Methods
We
searched
Medline,
Embase,
PsycInfo
in
January
2024,
conducted
forward
citation
searches
Scopus,
reference
lists
for
studies
reporting
outcomes
(among
those
with
COVID-19)
use
among
people
any
age
at
least
4
weeks
confirmed/suspected
Titles/abstracts
required
one
reviewer
include
but
two
exclude;
we
switched
single
screening
50%
citations
were
screened.
Selection
full
texts
used
independent
reviewers.
Data
extraction
risk
bias
assessments
by
verified.
Studies
sorted
into
categories
based
population
outcomes,
timing
outcome
assessment,
and,
if
suitable,
study
proportions
pooled
using
Freeman-Tukey
transformation
assessment
heterogeneity
predetermined
subgroups.
Results
45
included
20
28
outcomes.
60%
rated
as
high
bias,
mainly
due
difficulty
attributing
potential
confounding
employment
status
or
prior
mostly
(85%)
reported
populations
infection
that
was
cared
outpatient/mixed
care
settings.
Among
use,
hospitalized
43%
assessed
post-acute
prolonged
symptoms.
Across
13
(N=3,106),
average
25%
(95%
CI
14%,
38%)
participants
had
unable
work
some
duration
time.
It
difficult
associate
inability
having
symptom,
because
often
focused
a
couple
proportion
ranged
4%
71%,
being
very
across
(I
2
>98%)
not
explained
subgroup
analyses.
Most
these
infected
pre-Omicron
strains.
There
scarce
data
inform
work.
For
capacity
productivity,
there
conceptual
variability
between
only
narrowly
symptom.
On
21
(N=445,994),
10%
6%,
14%)
seeing
professional
type
(psychiatrist,
psychologist,
unspecified).
Heterogeneity
investigation.
limited
information
number
sessions
attended.
seven
studies,
post-COVID-19
symptoms,
participant
referrals
4.2%
45.3%
variety
types
neuropsychology,
psychiatric,
psychological.
Though
findings
large
suggested
1-2%
during
their
may
be
re-hospitalized
attributed
COVID-19.
Conclusions
A
minority
(possibly
25%)
who
experience
persisting
able
period
time
About
experiencing
have
phase,
though
this
rate
most
applicable
small
1-2%)
require
re-hospitalization
issues.
applicability
results
cases
rather
than
more
broadly
general
populations.
Overall,
highlights
measurement,
definition
PROSPERO
CRD42024504369
Psychological Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
54(14), С. 3939 - 3948
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024
Abstract
Background
Should
COVID-19
have
a
direct
impact
on
the
risk
of
depression,
it
would
suggest
specific
pathways
for
prevention
and
treatment.
In
this
retrospective
population-based
study,
we
aimed
to
examine
association
prior
SARS-CoV-2
infection
with
depressive
symptoms,
distinguishing
self-reported
v
.
biologically
confirmed
COVID-19.
Methods
32
007
participants
from
SAPRIS
survey
nested
in
French
CONSTANCES
cohort
were
included.
was
measured
as
followed:
ad
hoc
serologic
testing,
PCR
or
serology
positive
test
results,
Depressive
symptoms
Center
Epidemiologic
Studies-Depression
Scale
(CES-D).
Outcomes
(total
CES-D
score,
its
four
dimensions,
clinically
significant
symptoms)
exposure
(no
COVID-19/self-reported
unconfirmed
COVID-19/biologically
COVID-19).
Results
comparison
without
COVID-19,
had
higher
scores
(
β
one
interquartile
range
increase
[95%
CI]:
0.15
[0.08–0.22]
0.09
[0.05–0.13],
respectively)
somatic
complaints
dimension
(0.15
[0.09–0.21]
0.10
[0.07–0.13]).
Only
those
but
depressed
affect
(0.08
[0.01–0.14]).
Accounting
testing
only,
score
only
associated
combination
negative
results.
Conclusions
The
between
merely
driven
by
depression
did
not
follow
gradient
consistent
hypothesis
depression.
Background
Assessing
the
risk
of
subsequent
self-harm
after
hospitalisation
for
COVID-19
is
critical
mental
health
care
planning
during
and
pandemic.
Aims
This
study
aims
to
compare
admission
hospital
within
12
months
following
a
first
half
2020,
with
hospitalisations
other
reasons.
Method
Using
French
administrative
healthcare
database,
logistic
regression
models
were
employed
analyse
data
from
patients
admitted
hospitals
in
metropolitan
France
between
January
June
2020.
The
analysis
included
adjustments
sociodemographic
factors,
psychiatric
history
level
received
initial
stay.
Results
Of
96
313
hospitalised
COVID-19,
336
(0.35%)
subsequently
months,
compared
20
135
(0.72%)
2
797
775
difference
remained
significant
adjusting
factors
(adjusted
odds
ratio
(aOR)
=
0.66,
95%
CI:
0.59–0.73),
disorder
(aOR
0.65,
0.58–0.73)
stay
0.70,
0.63–0.78).
History
disorders
intensive
strongly
correlated
increased
risk,
while
older
age
was
inversely
associated
admissions.
Conclusions
Hospitalisation
early
pandemic
linked
lower
than
Clinicians
should
consider
evaluating
future
suicide.