Global Ocean Governance and Policy: Are Current Trends in Research and Collaboration Networks Invigorating toward Sustainable Ocean Futures? DOI
Baker Matovu, Fatma Mahmoud,

Bridget Mwabvu

и другие.

KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 16(2), С. 77 - 122

Опубликована: Дек. 1, 2024

Язык: Английский

An evaluation of marine economy sustainable development and the ramifications of digital technologies in China coastal regions DOI
Xiaohan Fang, Ying Zhang, Jiajia Yang

и другие.

Economic Analysis and Policy, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 82, С. 554 - 570

Опубликована: Март 24, 2024

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

15

Linking the blue economy to Women's empowerment to create avenues for the realization of ocean sustainability targets in the global south DOI Creative Commons
Baker Matovu, Raimund Bleischwitz, Isaac Lukambagire

и другие.

Ocean & Coastal Management, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 262, С. 107582 - 107582

Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1

The relationship between dynamic monitoring network plans and eco-efficiency – New evidence from atmospheric quality monitoring policy in China DOI
Pengyu Chen, Abd Alwahed Dagestani, Rui Zhao

и другие.

Journal of Environmental Management, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 348, С. 119297 - 119297

Опубликована: Окт. 22, 2023

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

12

Plastics’ circular economy for the Galápagos Islands? Exploring plastics governance with implications for social and ocean equity in a UNESCO World Heritage Site DOI Creative Commons
Juan José Alava,

María José Barragán‐Paladines,

Jessica Vandenberg

и другие.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 11

Опубликована: Янв. 7, 2025

IntroductionIn an era dominated by plastics (i.e., The 'Plasticene' Haram et al., 2020), where synthetic plastic materials and chemicals are pervasive in our daily lives, industries, natural environments, it is crucial to focus on addressing the underlying structural causes of marine pollution, particularly those affecting remote islands coastal communities global ocean. Conversely, within context Blue Economy transition, which emphasizes sustainable use ocean resources, integrating equity sustainability into development policies presents a key opportunity address systemic root pollution (Bennett 2023; Cisneros-Montemayor 2019; 2021; Simon 2021). Plastic production deeply intertwined with legacies colonialism persistence inequities, have shaped production, consumption, disposal (Liboiron, Fuller 2022). unchecked proliferation toxic wasteful plastics, driven monopoly capitalism influence powerful multinational corporations (Jacques, Mah, 2022), drives these disproportionately low-income historically marginalized (Vandenberg Ota, 2022; Vandenberg 2024). Ineffective inequitable waste management systems further entrench disparities. Thus, developing truly equitable just circular economy for necessitates critically examining institutional historical issues, ensuring that new do not perpetuate same inequities they seek resolve. An requires bold solutions eradicate while championing management, environmental justice, social equity.The governance literature increasingly recognizes as multidimensional concept includes distributional, procedural, recognitional, contextual dimensions, defined elsewhere (Croft 2024; Crosman Friedman 2018; Law Pascual 2014, McDermott 2013, Ota This call advancing approach emerges need challenge how approaches change often been developed alignment Eurocentric scientific academic theories methodologies. These lack direct meaningful engagement diverse plural forms knowledge, values, actions, practices other cultural groups, especially Global South, apply solve everyday socio-ecological challenges. Hegemonic research-to-action strategies tend be based partial limited design frameworks marginalize varied range knowledges on-the-ground actors essential advance partnerships collaborations more effective innovative knowledge-action initiatives change. In this context, role - aimed dismantle inequity inequality through oceans paramount importance (Crosman Ocean Nexus, doing so, interventions should recognize issues cause such colonial oppressions, racism, exploitative benefit already wealthy worsening poor, building up plans monitoring programs reverse (Ocean diversity heterogeneity knowledge value across different resource users require recognition existence both ontological plurality (diversity ways existing world) epistemic knowing world). collaborative must able accommodate representation provide spaces inclusive dialogue seats equal voices at table rightsholders representing all facets (Kovacs Pataki, 2016; Ludwig MacNaghten, 2020). important ensures perspectives stakeholders, rightsholders, holders, including directly affected it, included can tackle issue.A specific showcase study local foster socially equitable, environmentally sustainable, economically viable Galápagos Islands, crossroads facing changes because emerging cumulative multiple-anthropogenic stressors, complex Marine Reserve National Park (Alava Among human-made stressors impacting islands, contamination macro- microplastics) tandem (e.g., persistent organic pollutants mercury) unique marine-coastal ecosystems, endemic species, fishing heavily reliant seafood 2014; Alava Ross, Jones McMullen Muñoz-Abril Muñoz-Pérez Schofield A transition from traditional linear 'cradle-to-grave' system reduces leakage, embracing reduction, reusing, recycling, recovering via has suggested (Jones 2023); however, consequences social-ecological impacts implementing yet evaluated, introduction plastic— material locally sourced their communities' land.Aiming problem question identify potential resulting model resembles complicated challenge. only objectives better understand structure functions human communities), but also explore gaps implementation plastics' (Figure 1). Understanding dynamics foundation solution-oriented research necessary community-grounded intervention framework. Within premise considering affect nations than nations, we: (1) Argue circularity may challenging oceanic small island states (SIDS) produced, difficult repaired or recycled, affects who face challenges; by, (2) Demonstrating effectively ensure resources availability impacted current future generations unable fully participate economy, thereby exacerbating islands. issue relevant framework blue essential.Corporate accountability life cycle plasticsAlthough inherently issue, influenced supply chains, international trade mechanisms, market networks actors, largely attributed industrial corporate producing ineffective solid enabled racial capitalism. Ultimately, prioritized end-of-life focused symptom-targeted solutions, rather problem, targeted efforts limit (O'Neil, As stands, industries companies accountable responsible emissions avoid responsibilities derailing regulatory actions redirecting responsibility outside consumers managers 1); advocating supporting advances technological keep away restrictions (Vandenberg, Tangpuori Moreover, industry state enable operate form colonialism, allowing high-income dump "pollution havens" (Owens Conlon, 2021) "shadow places" (Plumwood, 2008) regulation, cost, political power. It therefore critical systematic organizations, power dynamics, structures heart central sectors. factors considered when assessing mitigating reducing pollution. For example, regional contribution footprint Islands' coastlines beaches assessed analysing overall quantity branded litter, demonstrated al. (2023). Their identified 98 manufacturers contributing four top polluters accounting 53.2% total items. Specifically, AjeGroup contributed 20%, followed Coca-Cola Company (18.2%), Tingyi Holding Corporation (8.8%) Pepsico (6.2%). remaining 46.8% was (Muñoz-Pérez 2023). Along assessment prescribed panacea negative externalities United Nations Plastics Treaty combat (UNEP, mainly pursued countries North European Union, America), acknowledging complexity versus South binary meta-categorization debate (Haugh shown Figure 1, per se ideal promoting strongly relying constantly flowing back forth consumption closed loop reuse (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, O'Neil, 2019). Yet, still inequalities neglect justice due available most exposed minority i.e., Indigenous peoples Liboiron, Low-income, well concerned less legal technical capacity implement infrastructure support approach. people living oceanic, remote, continental coast areas, native communities, countries, common public health, food safety, security microplastics. work intended SIDS, inhabiting some undeveloped countries. Galápagos: wicked problemAccording (2020), nature becoming Islands. At glance, remained virtually unchanged since Charles Darwin visited except localized urbanization three larger ubiquitous anthropogenic litter now found beaches, waters species archipelago 2020; human-populated Galápagos, hand, level municipal collection shore cleanup high fairly organized urban areas despite challenges improve first province Ecuador clear regulations ban reduce commercialization single‐use bags high‐density low‐density polyethylene bags) disposable Styrofoam (expanded polystyrene) containers (Galapagos Government Council, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Contrasting efforts, uncontrolled illegal dumping constitutes compromising systems' health short long terms recurrent incidence massive fleets Asian‐flagged vessels) operating illegal, unreported, unregulated (IUU) activities around exclusive economic zone (EEZ) Islands Paladines, 2017; 2022) plausible mobile major sources debris bottles Asian labels islands' shorelines, recently. Similarly, circulation modelling predicted oceanographic pathways floating southeastern tropical Pacific, identifying coasts emission Van Sebille regions include Pacific America Central America, Costa Rica, Panamá, Colombia, southern Ecuador, Perú, main inputs maritime traffic (Van traceable products branding information 14 transboundary these, Perú accounted 46.14% total, China 24.4% 18.32%, respectively Meijer (2021) revealed 12% share emitted eastern rivers 1,136 tons year. releases 0.09 exported air. permanent transport urbanized American continents, suggest likely impact. Additionally, centers populated Galápagos. highlight compounded foreign IUU fleets, long-range situation concerted effort will governments coordinated integrate needs preservation ecosystems. Ensuring long-term resilience healthy depends fostering actively involve management. Is Plastics' solution Galapagos?Historically, early settlements arrived archipelago, continuous unlimited population growth Galapagos matter preoccupation. How many could accommodate? much viability foster? And what remains questions answered. uncertainty, likeliness remain diminishes. During last years, active explicit arisen among bodies managed put place certain Resolutions Nro. 038-CGREG-19-XI-2014, 05-CGREG-2015 prohibit import usage single-use plastics) popular habit residents refillable water bottle) production/import/usage islands.The proposed transitioning While idea conceived reduce, reutilize, treat, export used recycled control hamper originating centres, visitors, partially environments insular region conserve surrounding ocean, zones, shores, biodiversity site, envisioned. To policy contribute dismantling eradicating linger whether formulated Westernized innovation address, mitigate, minimize exposure energy emissions, associated additives microbial pathogens reusing repairing otherwise would wellbeing, fragile ecosystems Galapagos. We claim there energy-related leaking under does gap internalize access towards portrayed recipe actually reproduce legacy According Skene (2018), imaginary garden fantasy deliver sustainability. Few authors referenced flow (e.g. Allwood 2012; Allwood, 2014), Cooper (2005) emphasized sufficiency fundamental level: "a circle circle, zero-waste means zero loop". terminology misrepresentative, re-enforcing deceiving somehow inform revolution economics closed, zero-waste, (Skene, 2018), bringing ideological agenda hypothetical-normative utopia generating uncertainty contributions depoliticizing (Corvellec Lamberton highlighted exists between growth-based expressing "the reinforces view neoclassical principles barrier achieving ecological contained contemporary interpretations development" (Lamberton, 2005, p. 53). steps needed look like reduction before internalizing circulatory SIDS First, implications sites, underdeveloped critical. experiences its consequences, fix along make decisions divorce dependence proactive end assessments (Simon exhibiting rates stemming demand success failure mitigation. feasibility plastic, socioeconomic surveys aspects behavioural ecotourism, recreation, fisheries, markets subsistence pursued. Doing perceptions sentiments generated community help basic needs, livelihood, culture, well-being, connections nature. Second, participatory consultation, treatment clean fish framed realities, stressors. transdisciplinary community-based conservation vital protection coastal, rural, assisted appropriate care, mitigation strategies, education hygiene, prevention measures environment, seafoods free Bennett Onyena close conjunction —all components refers sectors simultaneously conditions align quantification ecosystem services; see Spalding, addressed empowered equitably decision-making processes pollution.ConclusionConcerted, precautionary enforcement cap reform urgently roots just-transitions corporative manufacturing exporting sites champion innovations friendly eliminate reaches place. framework, intending oceanic-coastal

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Income-Dependent Variations in Innovation Performance: Insights from Sustainable Economic Development Indicators DOI Creative Commons
Phi-Hung Nguyen, Duy Van Nguyen, Tuan Duc Nguyen

и другие.

Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 11(1), С. 100478 - 100478

Опубликована: Янв. 15, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

Integrating equity and justice in marine ecosystem models: An incremental but meaningful approach DOI Creative Commons
Sieme Bossier, Andrés M. Cisneros‐Montemayor

Ecological Modelling, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 503, С. 111058 - 111058

Опубликована: Фев. 17, 2025

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0

A framework for assessing the blue equity of social-ocean systems in marine governance transformation DOI Creative Commons

Mingbao Chen,

Yuhao Wang, Zhibin Xu

и другие.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11

Опубликована: Июль 8, 2024

The equitable utilization of marine resources and the maintenance healthy sustainable ecosystems are essential to advancing United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promoting well-being all humanity. In this paper, we propose a Blue Equity Assessment Framework, which is based on systematic literature review approach takes into account characteristics Social-Ocean Systems (SOSs). framework consists Distributional Equity, Procedural Recognitional Contextual Equity. aim conduct equity analyses policies or behaviors within SOSs in order assess whether blue explicitly implemented practiced these societal norms policy mechanisms. assessment reveals that has positive synergy for majority SDGs. This analyzed terms its influence dimensions distributional justice, procedural recognitional contextual justice. findings enhance understanding issues, thereby guiding policymakers prioritization development transformation global ocean governance.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

3

An inequity assessment framework for planning coastal and marine conservation and development interventions DOI Creative Commons
Gerald G. Singh,

Justine Keefer,

Yoshitaka Ota

и другие.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 10

Опубликована: Ноя. 14, 2023

Sustainable development should promote equity with benefits for coastal communities. Many conservation and initiatives promise to contribute an equitable future without being designed do so. Here, we assessment tool help interventions plan through forecasting evaluating the risks of contributing inequities, in order against them. Building from rich literatures impact assessment, procedural justice, postcolonial studies, critical race theory, fields sociology studying accrual advantage disadvantage among different groups, propose framework follow key principles that center on understanding how affect marginalized people, assess planning, implementation, outcome decisions build each other reflect (or work against) broader systemic contextual pressures perpetuate inequities. In monitoring potential communities proponents be able realization these adverse impacts. We show can used three case studies: 1) a climate adaptation project; 2) marine protected areas; 3) debt relief program. is about promoting equity, but only methods employed confront understand inequitable consequences

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

9

Operationalizing social equity in public policy design: A comparative analysis of solar equity policies in the United States DOI
Shan Zhou, Xue Gao, Adam Wellstead

и другие.

Policy Studies Journal, Год журнала: 2023, Номер 51(4), С. 741 - 772

Опубликована: Май 5, 2023

Abstract While it is widely recognized that energy injustices are prevalent in the clean transition process, there has been limited research attention on policy efforts aiming to mitigate these inequities. In this paper, we use solar equity policies as an empirical case study understand how social considerations conceptualized and operationalized content. We build upon design literature code institutional statements of 54 adopted between 2001 2021 United States. our comparative analysis, focus three levels elements can be directly observed written language: macro‐policy goal construction, meso‐policy instrument choices, micro‐level settings calibrations. find justice multifaceted, with a great emphasis accessibility provision economic benefits security for disadvantaged communities. There dominant preference by policymakers redistributive community programs advance justice‐related goals. Solar instruments on‐the‐ground measures have also calibrated target specific populations system, which mostly income‐based vulnerability.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

7

Equity zombies in Canada’s blue economy: a critical feminist analysis for equitable policy implementation DOI Creative Commons
Christine Knott,

Leah M. Fusco,

Jack Daly

и другие.

Frontiers in Marine Science, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 11

Опубликована: Март 18, 2024

Introduction Ocean equity is a key aim of blue economy frameworks globally and pillar the international High Level Panel for A Sustainable Economy. However, offers only general definition ocean equity, with limited guidance countries. Canada, as party to Panel’s agenda, developing its own strategy, seeking reshape ocean-based industries advocate new ones. How will be incorporated across scales not yet known but has implications how countries like Canada develop their industries. This raises important questions, including what are Canada’s commitments in relation they met? Currently, identified emerging narratives governed through both federal provincial legislation policies. These shape implemented at different scales. Methods In this paper, we examine term defined relevant look understandings found critical feminist, environmental justice, climate justice scholarship could inform policy implementation within economy. We focus on two that economy: offshore oil marine salmon aquaculture Canadian province Newfoundland Labrador. investigate existing shapes characterization, incorporation, these Results discussion Our analysis highlights cohesive approach needed ensure more robust engagement social issues discourse implementation.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2