
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 105911 - 105911
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 105911 - 105911
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 157(4), С. 2636 - 2656
Опубликована: Апрель 1, 2025
Onomatopoeias like hiss and peep are iconic because their forms resemble meanings. Iconicity can also involve meanings in different modalities, such as when people match the nonce words bouba kiki to round angular objects, mil mal small large ones, known “sound symbolism.” This paper focuses on what specific analogies motivate correspondences spoken language: do associate shapes size with how phonemes sound (auditory), or they produced (articulatory)? Based a synthesis of empirical evidence probing cognitive mechanisms underlying types symbolism, this argues that based acoustics alone often sufficient, rendering extant articulatory explanations for many phenomena superfluous. further suggests crossmodal iconicity language fruitfully be understood an extension onomatopoeia: speakers iconically depict perceptual characteristics shape, mimic correlated these natural world.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown, С. 105911 - 105911
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
3