Consensus-Based Recommendations for Assessing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Systematic Review DOI Open Access
Helmar Bornemann‐Cimenti, Johanna Lång,

Sascha Hammer

и другие.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14(10), С. 3595 - 3595

Опубликована: Май 21, 2025

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome encompasses physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments that persist in patients after discharge from an intensive unit. There is considerable variation the tools used for assessment. This systematic review aimed to summarize consensus-based recommendations assessing post-intensive syndrome. Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified four guidelines. quality assessment carried out using Appraisal of Guidelines Research Evaluation II tool demonstrated high methodological standards across all included papers. Results: The guidelines consistently emphasize cognition, mental health, physical function as core domains. However, there are notable differences specific recommended. Major et al. focused on examinations, while Mikkelsen proposed a fundamental package five covering key Spies pragmatic set freely available instruments administrable within 30 min. Nakanishi provided detailed ranking each domain. availability validated translations varied considerably languages. Some developed specifically were not considered by any consensus conference. Conclusions: Further work needed establish universally accepted standard considers practical implementation diverse settings

Язык: Английский

Consensus-Based Recommendations for Assessing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Systematic Review DOI Open Access
Helmar Bornemann‐Cimenti, Johanna Lång,

Sascha Hammer

и другие.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 14(10), С. 3595 - 3595

Опубликована: Май 21, 2025

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome encompasses physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments that persist in patients after discharge from an intensive unit. There is considerable variation the tools used for assessment. This systematic review aimed to summarize consensus-based recommendations assessing post-intensive syndrome. Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified four guidelines. quality assessment carried out using Appraisal of Guidelines Research Evaluation II tool demonstrated high methodological standards across all included papers. Results: The guidelines consistently emphasize cognition, mental health, physical function as core domains. However, there are notable differences specific recommended. Major et al. focused on examinations, while Mikkelsen proposed a fundamental package five covering key Spies pragmatic set freely available instruments administrable within 30 min. Nakanishi provided detailed ranking each domain. availability validated translations varied considerably languages. Some developed specifically were not considered by any consensus conference. Conclusions: Further work needed establish universally accepted standard considers practical implementation diverse settings

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0