Conceptualizing a load and volume autoregulation integrated velocity model to minimize neuromuscular fatigue and maximize neuromuscular adaptations in resistance training
European Journal of Applied Physiology,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 26, 2025
Язык: Английский
Modeling the repetitions‐in‐reserve‐velocity relationship: a valid method for resistance training monitoring and prescription, and fatigue management
Physiological Reports,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
12(5)
Опубликована: Фев. 28, 2024
Abstract
Establishing
a
relationship
between
repetitions
left
in
reserve
and
the
mean
absolute
velocity
(RIR‐velocity
relationship)
during
resistance
training
(RT)
could
allow
for
objective
monitoring,
prescription,
real‐time
adjustment
of
load
set‐volume.
Therefore,
we
examined
goodness
fit
prediction
accuracy
general
individual
RIR‐velocity
relationships
free‐weight
back
squat
exercise.
The
effects
sex,
status
history,
as
well
personality
traits,
on
these
were
also
investigated.
Forty‐six
resistance‐trained
people
(15
females
31
males)
performed
one‐repetition
maximum
(1RM)
test,
two
to
failure
(RTF)
tests
72
h
apart.
We
found
greater
compared
relationships.
Individual,
but
not
established
first
testing
session
yielded
acceptable
RIR
(mean
error
<2
repetitions)
subsequent
session,
regardless
used.
Similar
results
obtained
when
both
averaged
across
loads,
suggesting
that
single
covering
range
loads
can
be
used
instead
traditional
RT
methods,
potentially
allowing
better
fatigue
management
more
efficient
adaptation.
Язык: Английский
Estimating repetitions in reserve through movement velocity: Applicability across bench press exercise modes and sexes
Journal of Sports Sciences,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 13
Опубликована: Март 24, 2025
This
study
explored
the
accuracy
of
using
relationship
between
repetitions
in
reserve
(RIR)
and
mean
velocity
(MV)
to
predict
proximity
failure
bench
press
exercises
across
two
modes
(Smith
machine
free-weight)
sexes
(men
women).
Twenty-eight
recreationally
trained
individuals
completed
sessions
each
exercise
mode,
with
sets
performed
at
65%
75%
one-repetition
maximum.
Individualized
RIR-MV
relationships
showed
a
higher
goodness-of-fit
for
Smith
compared
free-weight
(R2
=
0.79–0.87
vs.
0.41–0.78),
without
significant
sex
differences
(p
0.880).
MV
values
were
mostly
similar
different
RIRs
>
0.077),
but
men
demonstrated
than
women
RIR
5–1
≤
0.013).
more
accurate
estimating
5
65%1RM
subsequent
generalized
(absolute
errors
0.64–1.36
1.25–2.00
repetitions;
p
<
0.001),
regardless
sex.
However,
prediction
was
both
2
0
1
repetition;
≥
0.164).
These
results
suggest
that
can
effectively
estimate
sexes,
individualized
offering
greater
accuracy.
Язык: Английский
Gauging proximity to failure in the bench press: generalized velocity-based vs. %1RM-repetitions-to-failure approaches
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
17(1)
Опубликована: Март 25, 2025
This
study
compared
the
accuracy
of
three
generalized
approaches
for
estimating
proximity
to
failure
during
Smith
machine
bench
press:
(i)
relationship
between
relative
load
(%1RM)
and
maximum
repetitions
performed
(%1RM-RTF),
(ii)
fastest
set
velocity
(RTF-velocity),
(iii)
left
in
reserve
(RIR)
lifting
(RIR-velocity).
Nineteen
physically
active
men
(22.9
±
2.7
years
old)
with
at
least
two
resistance
training
experience
participated.
Their
1-repetition
(1RM
=
86.8
16.7
kg)
was
determined
first
session.
In
second
session,
participants
single
sets
60%
80%
1RM,
(2RIR
4RIR)
estimated
using
each
approach.
The
RIR-velocity
only
approach
that
did
not
significantly
deviate
from
intended
RIR
(errors
-0.4
0.6
repetitions).
contrast,
both
%1RM-RTF
RTF-velocity
relationships
overestimated
60%1RM
2RIR
(2.9
5.8
repetitions,
respectively)
4RIR
(2.8
5.7
respectively),
while
no
significant
differences
were
observed
80%1RM
-0.6
0.9
generally
demonstrated
lowest
absolute
errors
actual
(1.3
0.7
repetitions),
greater
other
lighter
loads
closer
proximities
failure.
absence
individual
relationships,
general
should
be
used
by
coaches
control
their
athletes
press
exercise.
Язык: Английский
Repetitions in Reserve: An Emerging Method for Strength Exercise Prescription in Special Populations
Strength and conditioning journal,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Дек. 17, 2024
ABSTRACT
This
review
briefly
outlines
the
benefits
and
limitations
of
traditional
methods
for
prescribing
resistance
training
(RT)
exercise
intensity
(i.e.,
percentage
1
repetition
maximum,
velocity-based
training,
rating
perceived
exertion)
special
populations
based
on
mechanical
psychological
indicators.
Given
these
limitations,
in
reserve
(RIR)
method,
which
quantifies
discrepancy
between
potential
actual
repetitions,
has
been
proposed
as
a
safer,
more
effective,
adaptable
alternative
to
optimize
RT
populations.
study
provides
an
overview
main
RIR
scales
used
scientific
literature
synthesizes
validation
studies.
Although
validity
reliability
method
have
not
extensively
tested
across
different
populations,
scarcity
studies
applying
it
clinical
contexts
detected,
this
proposes
practical
application
that
integrates
existing
rehabilitation
settings
individuals
with
chronic
health
conditions.
In
conclusion,
shows
promise
broader
settings,
further
research
is
needed
validate
its
effectiveness
diverse
population
groups.
Язык: Английский