Is it feasible for European laboratories to use SI units in reporting results? DOI Creative Commons

Martina Zaninotto,

Luisa Agnello, Lora Dukić

и другие.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2025

Abstract The ultimate goal of harmonization, crucial to quality in laboratory medicine, is improve patient outcomes by providing accurate, actionable information. Patients and healthcare professionals assume that clinical tests performed different laboratories at times on the same type sample are comparable, results can be reliably consistently interpreted. In this context reporting units for have a considerable influence numeric result. harmonization measurement report, leads provision interchangeable comparable results, thus maximizing validity information, assuring more accurate diagnosis better treatment patient. However, although efforts been made recent years, criticisms continue. This opinion paper, prepared jointly EFLM Committee Harmonization (C-H) Postanalytical phase (C-POST), describes “general pragmatic approach” proposed drafting guidelines order ensure they used as widely possible.

Язык: Английский

Is it feasible for European laboratories to use SI units in reporting results? DOI Creative Commons

Martina Zaninotto,

Luisa Agnello, Lora Dukić

и другие.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown

Опубликована: Фев. 18, 2025

Abstract The ultimate goal of harmonization, crucial to quality in laboratory medicine, is improve patient outcomes by providing accurate, actionable information. Patients and healthcare professionals assume that clinical tests performed different laboratories at times on the same type sample are comparable, results can be reliably consistently interpreted. In this context reporting units for have a considerable influence numeric result. harmonization measurement report, leads provision interchangeable comparable results, thus maximizing validity information, assuring more accurate diagnosis better treatment patient. However, although efforts been made recent years, criticisms continue. This opinion paper, prepared jointly EFLM Committee Harmonization (C-H) Postanalytical phase (C-POST), describes “general pragmatic approach” proposed drafting guidelines order ensure they used as widely possible.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

0