Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing DOI Creative Commons
Марина Рашитовна Бабикова

Nauchnyi Dialog, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(8), С. 171 - 187

Опубликована: Окт. 27, 2024

This study aims to identify the predominant cognitive mechanisms underlying graffiti. The analysis is based on photographs of over 2000 instances urban graphic defacement (i.e., graffiti) documented in major cities across Russia, including Yekaterinburg, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Nizhny Novgorod. Utilizing content expert evaluation methods, research delineates three key that contribute semantic unity first mechanism, compression, manifests defacements through linguistic play or transmission discursive texts. second defocusing, linguistically actualized technique absurdity (everyday anchors illogicality) activation emotion surprise. It noted surprise elicits various reactions from audience — such as loss control, bewilderment, uncertainty which subsequently leads prolonged retention memory meanings embedded respective graffiti against a backdrop vivid atypical psycho-emotional states. third focusing, embodied philosophical

Язык: Английский

Vandalism. Why Doesn’t the “Broken Windows” Theory Work? DOI Creative Commons
Olga V. Kruzhkova

Psychology and Law, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 14(3), С. 26 - 38

Опубликована: Сен. 27, 2024

<p style="text-align: justify;">Vandalism is a widespread phenomenon that causes material damage and contributes to the degradation of urban environment, which requires introduction effective preventive measures based on an understanding genesis phenomenology vandalism. One basic theories used in prevention vandalism &ldquo;broken windows&rdquo; theory. The theory suggests spread vandal transformations caused by initial signals potential for norm violations, weak social control, insufficient sanctioning such violations. Minor signs tolerance deviance environment (graffiti, littering, etc.) may contribute serious delinquent behavior. As result, has been central &ldquo;zero tolerance&rdquo; policy. There are valid criticisms theory, related both its evidence base failure account complex causal relationships operation norms. Regarding vandalism, limitations diversity forms activity, each regulated separate norms, lack desire anonymity or avoidance sanctions some vandals, tactical nature close connection with cultural foundations community.</p>

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

2

Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing DOI Creative Commons
Марина Рашитовна Бабикова

Nauchnyi Dialog, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 13(8), С. 171 - 187

Опубликована: Окт. 27, 2024

This study aims to identify the predominant cognitive mechanisms underlying graffiti. The analysis is based on photographs of over 2000 instances urban graphic defacement (i.e., graffiti) documented in major cities across Russia, including Yekaterinburg, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Nizhny Novgorod. Utilizing content expert evaluation methods, research delineates three key that contribute semantic unity first mechanism, compression, manifests defacements through linguistic play or transmission discursive texts. second defocusing, linguistically actualized technique absurdity (everyday anchors illogicality) activation emotion surprise. It noted surprise elicits various reactions from audience — such as loss control, bewilderment, uncertainty which subsequently leads prolonged retention memory meanings embedded respective graffiti against a backdrop vivid atypical psycho-emotional states. third focusing, embodied philosophical

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1