GAI as a Catalyst in National Technology Sovereignty: Evaluating the Influence of GAI on Government Policy DOI
Noor Alnahhas, Dima Yousef

Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2024

As a result of the prominence generative artificial intelligence across diverse fields, it has become necessary for governments to develop national strategies directing ethical use respect fundamental human values. This paper explores role Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in technology sovereignty, its contributions, and benefits government, associated risks, challenges, how influences government policies. It begins with examining GAI's capabilities comprehend understands natural language, trains on existing data, generates realistic outputs, followed by discussion potential that enable them act independently autonomously sectors. highlights can empower administer technological ecosystems, promote domestic innovation, facilitate policy-making processes. However, contrary benefits, GAI is also capable inflicting negative consequences society. Therefore, addresses risks challenges necessitate reflection policies developing new ones align nation's legal frameworks. Exploring influence policies, significance collaboration endeavors ensure future developments bring value public interest democratic comprehensive analysis aims shed light responsible preserve rights, economic growth, sustain social justice, inform within framework sovereignty.

Язык: Английский

How Generative AI Is Transforming Journalism: Development, Application and Ethics DOI Creative Commons
Yi Shi, L. Sun

Journalism and Media, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 5(2), С. 582 - 594

Опубликована: Май 10, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is a technology based on algorithms, models, etc., that creates content such as text, audio, images, videos, and code. GAI deeply integrated into journalism tools, platforms systems. However, GAI’s role in dilutes the power of media professionals, changes traditional news production poses ethical questions. This study attempts to systematically answer these questions specific journalistic practices from perspectives professionalism epistemology. Building review development application, this identifies responsibilities organizations, journalists audiences, ensuring they realize potential while adhering universal human values avoid negative technological effects.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

18
Will Artificial Intelligence Affect How Cultural Heritage Will Be Managed in the Future? Responses Generated by Four genAI Models DOI Creative Commons
Dirk Spennemann

Heritage, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 7(3), С. 1453 - 1471

Опубликована: Март 11, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) language models have become firmly embedded in public consciousness. Their abilities to extract and summarise information from a wide range of sources their training data attracted the attention many scholars. This paper examines how four genAI large (ChatGPT, GPT4, DeepAI, Google Bard) responded prompts, asking (i) whether would affect cultural heritage will be managed future (with examples requested) (ii) what dangers might emerge when relying heavily on guide professionals actions. The systems provided examples, commonly drawing extending status quo. Without doubt, AI tools revolutionise execution repetitive mundane tasks, such as classification some classes artifacts, or allow for predictive modelling decay objects. Important were used assess purported power extract, aggregate, synthesize volumes multiple sources, well ability recognise patterns connections that people may miss. An inherent risk ‘results’ presented by is are ‘artifacts’ system rather than being genuine. Since present unable purposively generate creative innovative thoughts, it left reader determine any text out ordinary meaningful nonsensical. Additional risks identified use without required level literacy overreliance lead deskilling general practitioners.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

10
The Origins and Veracity of References ‘Cited’ by Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications: Implications for the Quality of Responses DOI Creative Commons
Dirk Spennemann

Publications, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 13(1), С. 12 - 12

Опубликована: Март 12, 2025

The public release of ChatGPT in late 2022 has resulted considerable publicity and led to widespread discussion the usefulness capabilities generative Artificial intelligence (Ai) language models. Its ability extract summarise data from textual sources present them as human-like contextual responses makes it an eminently suitable tool answer questions users might ask. Expanding on a previous analysis ChatGPT3.5, this paper tested what archaeological literature appears have been included training phase three recent Ai models: ChatGPT4o, ScholarGPT, DeepSeek R1. While ChatGPT3.5 offered seemingly pertinent references, large percentage proved be fictitious. more model which is purportedly tailored towards academic needs, performed much better, still high rate fictitious references compared general models ChatGPT4o DeepSeek. Using ‘cloze’ make inferences ‘memorized’ by model, was unable prove that any four genAi had perused full texts genuine references. It can shown all provided other OpenAi models, well DeepSeek, were found genuine, also cited Wikipedia pages. This strongly indicates source base for at least some, if not most, those pages thus represents, best, third-hand material. significant implications relation quality available shape their answers. are discussed.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1
Will the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence Become an Age of Public Ignorance? DOI Open Access
Dirk Spennemann

Опубликована: Сен. 22, 2023

Generative artificial intelligence (AI), in particular large language models such as ChatGPT have reached public consciousness with a wide-ranging discussion of their capabilities and suitability for various professions. Following the printing press internet, generative AI are third transformative technological invention truly cross-sectoral impact on knowledge transmission. While allowed transmission that is independent physical presence holder publishers acting gatekeepers, internet added levels democratization allowing anyone to publish, along global immediacy. The development social media resulted an increased fragmentation tribalization on-line communities ways knowing, resulting alternative truths propagated echo chambers. It against this background entered consciousness. Using strategic foresight methodology, paper will examine polemic proposition age emerge ignorance.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

5
GAI as a Catalyst in National Technology Sovereignty: Evaluating the Influence of GAI on Government Policy DOI
Noor Alnahhas, Dima Yousef

Опубликована: Июнь 1, 2024

As a result of the prominence generative artificial intelligence across diverse fields, it has become necessary for governments to develop national strategies directing ethical use respect fundamental human values. This paper explores role Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in technology sovereignty, its contributions, and benefits government, associated risks, challenges, how influences government policies. It begins with examining GAI's capabilities comprehend understands natural language, trains on existing data, generates realistic outputs, followed by discussion potential that enable them act independently autonomously sectors. highlights can empower administer technological ecosystems, promote domestic innovation, facilitate policy-making processes. However, contrary benefits, GAI is also capable inflicting negative consequences society. Therefore, addresses risks challenges necessitate reflection policies developing new ones align nation's legal frameworks. Exploring influence policies, significance collaboration endeavors ensure future developments bring value public interest democratic comprehensive analysis aims shed light responsible preserve rights, economic growth, sustain social justice, inform within framework sovereignty.

Язык: Английский

Процитировано

1