
Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 9, 2024
Язык: Английский
Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 9, 2024
Язык: Английский
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans, Год журнала: 2025, Номер unknown, С. 100127 - 100127
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
1Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 6, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
5Tímarit um uppeldi og menntun, Год журнала: 2025, Номер 33(2), С. 83 - 102
Опубликована: Янв. 6, 2025
Á undanförnum misserum hefur verið töluverð umræða í háskólum um kosti og galla ChatGPT námi. er öflugt gervigreindarverkfæri sem byggt á risamállíkani líkir eftir mannlegum texta. Markmið rannsóknarinnar var að varpa ljósi viðhorf kennaranema Háskólanum Akureyri til haustmisseri 2023, tækifæri áskoranir tengdar notkun verkfærisins háskólanámi hvernig þau sáu fyrir sér nýta það framtíðinni. Einnig skoðað hvort þeirra breyttist yfir misserið. Gagna aflað með spurningakönnun tveimur námskeiðum kennarafræði, bæði upphafi við lok misserisins, gögnin þemagreind. Niðurstöður sýndu nemendur voru meðvitaðir lögðu áherslu ábyrga notkun. mátti greina breytingu viðhorfi nemenda garð þróun milli kannananna. Rannsóknin veitir upplýsingar þess meðal undirstrikar mikilvægi samtals samvinnu innan háskólasamfélagsins
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0International Medical Education, Год журнала: 2024, Номер 3(4), С. 406 - 425
Опубликована: Окт. 9, 2024
Despite the potential benefits of generative artificial intelligence (genAI), concerns about its psychological impact on medical students, especially job displacement, are apparent. This pilot study, conducted in Jordan during July–August 2024, aimed to examine specific fears, anxieties, mistrust, and ethical students harbor towards genAI. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 164 studying across various academic years, employing structured self-administered questionnaire with an internally consistent FAME scale—representing Fear, Anxiety, Mistrust, Ethics—comprising 12 items, 3 items for each construct. Exploratory confirmatory factors analyses assess construct validity scale. The results indicated variable levels anxiety genAI among participating students: 34.1% reported no genAI‘s role their future careers (n = 56), while 41.5% slightly anxious 61), 22.0% somewhat 36), 2.4% extremely 4). Among constructs, Mistrust was most agreed upon (mean: 12.35 ± 2.78), followed by Ethics 10.86 2.90), Fear 9.49 3.53), Anxiety 8.91 3.68). Their sex, level, Grade Point Average (GPA) did not significantly affect students’ perceptions However, there notable direct association between general elevated scores constructs Prior exposure previous use modify These findings highlight critical need refined educational strategies address integration into training. demonstrate anxiety, fear, regarding deployment healthcare, indicating necessity curriculum modifications that focus specifically these areas. Interventions should be tailored increase familiarity competency genAI, which would alleviate apprehensions equip physicians engage this inevitable technology effectively. study also highlights importance incorporating discussions courses mistrust human-centered aspects In conclusion, calls proactive evolution education prepare new AI-driven healthcare practices ensure well prepared, confident, ethically informed professional interactions technologies.
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
2Research Square (Research Square), Год журнала: 2024, Номер unknown
Опубликована: Авг. 9, 2024
Язык: Английский
Процитировано
0