Health Communication,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 12
Опубликована: Апрель 30, 2025
This
study
examines
the
relationship
between
different
information
consumption
patterns
and
COVID-19-related
outcomes
in
Oman.
A
total
of
759
participants
completed
a
cross-sectional
survey
from
September
to
October
2020
that
measured
COVID-19
knowledge,
misinformation,
fact-checking,
trust
sources,
institutional
trust,
vaccination
intentions.
Participants
were
categorized
into
four
groups
based
on
their
behaviors:
low
scanners/no
seekers
(LSNS),
scanners/seekers
(LSS),
high
(HSNS),
(HSS).
multivariate
analysis
variance
was
conducted
compare
outcome
variables,
structural
equation
modeling
(SEM)
explored
role
mediating
HSS
demonstrated
highest
levels
government
social
media,
confidence
crisis
management.
In
contrast,
LSNS
exhibited
lowest
knowledge
trust.
HSNS
most
susceptible
misinformation
conspiracy
beliefs.
Social
media
played
dual
as
both
trusted
source
conduit
for
misinformation.
SEM
highlighted
key
mediator
highlights
importance
audience
segmentation
public
health
strategies
necessity
fostering
active
information-seeking
enhance
uptake.
Targeted
interventions
can
mitigate
risks
among
passive
consumers,
while
campaigns
foster
fact-checking
digital
literacy.
Together,
these
help
bridge
gaps
compliance
during
crises.
Health Research Policy and Systems,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
20(1)
Опубликована: Март 5, 2022
Much
health
communication
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
been
designed
to
persuade
people
more
than
inform
them.
For
example,
messages
like
"masks
save
lives"
are
intended
compel
wear
face
masks,
not
enable
them
make
an
informed
decision
about
whether
a
mask
or
understand
justification
for
mandate.
Both
persuading
and
informing
reasonable
goals
communication.
However,
those
can
sometimes
be
in
conflict.
In
this
article,
we
discuss
potential
conflicts
between
seeking
people,
use
of
spin
ethics
persuasion,
implications
context
generally.
Decisions
rather
choice
may
justified,
but
basis
decisions
should
transparent
evidence
distorted.
We
suggest
nine
principles
guide
by
authorities
try
people.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
12
Опубликована: Сен. 14, 2021
This
article
describes
patterns
of
compliance
with
social
distancing
measures
among
the
Spanish
population
during
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
It
identifies
several
factors
associated
higher
or
lower
recommended
distancing.
research
is
part
a
67-country
study,
titled
BMJ Open,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
12(2), С. e053915 - e053915
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2022
Adverse
childhood
experiences
(ACEs)
can
affect
life-course
health
and
well-being,
including
risk-taking
behaviour
trust.
This
study
explored
associations
between
ACEs
trust
in
information
on
COVID-19,
attitudes
towards
compliance
with
COVID-19
restrictions
vaccine
hesitancy.National
cross-sectional
telephone
survey
using
a
sample
of
landline
mobile
numbers
stratified
by
Health
Board,
deprivation
quintile
age
group.Households
Wales
during
national
(December
2020
to
March
2021).2285
Welsh
residents
aged
≥18
years.Nine
ACEs;
low
National
Service
(NHS)
information;
supporting
removal
social
distancing
mandatory
face
coverings;
breaking
restrictions;
hesitancy
(rejection
or
uncertainty
vaccination).Increasing
ACE
counts
were
independently
related
NHS
information,
feeling
unfairly
restricted
government
ending
coverings.
High
(4+
vs
0
ACEs)
also
associated
distancing.
Breaking
increased
count
likelihood
doubling
from
no
4+
ACEs.
Vaccine
was
threefold
higher
(vs
younger
groups.
Thus,
modelled
estimates
ranged
3.42%
ACEs,
≥70
years,
38.06%
18-29
years.ACEs
are
common
across
populations
many
countries.
Understanding
how
they
impact
advice
uptake
medical
interventions
could
play
critical
role
the
continuing
response
controlling
future
pandemics.
Individuals
suffer
greater
risks
throughout
life
may
be
excluded
that
reduce
infection
risks.
While
pandemic
responses
should
consider
best
reach
those
suffering
longer
term,
better
public
is
another
reason
invest
safe
secure
childhoods
for
all
children.
Abstract
Background
Existing
research
has
extensively
explored
the
relationship
between
government
trust
and
compliance
behaviour,
but
significant
controversies
exist.
Some
studies
suggest
a
strong
positive
correlation
two.
Other
have
found
that
hinders
behaviour.
However,
during
pandemic,
effectiveness
of
public
health
policies
largely
depends
on
public’s
with
these
policies.
To
examine
aforementioned
controversies,
this
study
utilizes
survey
data
Chinese
population
COVID-19
period
to
explore
trust.
Methods
The
conducted
questionnaire
1,395
individuals
from
25
provinces
in
China
mid-November
mid-December
2022.
Firstly,
we
categorized
behaviour
based
results
factor
analysis.
Subsequently,
examined
impact
professional
by
constructing
structural
equation
model.
Results
Based
analysis,
classified
adherence
into
protective
restrictive
compliance.
model
show
both
compliance,
stronger
influence
Government
also
exerts
through
Additionally,
indicates
while
it
does
not
significantly
affect
Moreover,
rural
areas
demonstrates
greater
willingness
adhere
types
Married
exhibit
inclination
toward
females
tendency
Conclusion
revealed
refuting
any
negative
Normative
motivations
for
had
substantial
adherence.
These
findings
offer
valuable
insights
future
crisis
management
policy
formulation.
PLoS ONE,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
16(12), С. e0261276 - e0261276
Опубликована: Дек. 10, 2021
In
this
paper
we
analyze
panel
data
(N
=
400)
to
investigate
the
change
in
attitudes
towards
Covid-19
measures
and
compliance
behavior
between
first
second
lockdowns
a
sample
of
young
adults
from
University
Bern,
Switzerland.
We
find
considerable
fatigue.
While
respondents
expressed
high
acceptance
with
during
lockdown,
both
decreased
substantially
lockdown.
Moreover,
show
via
structural
equation
model
that
respondents’
is
largely
driven
by
perception
how
others
behave
measures.
All
other
effects
scrutinized
e.g.,
individual
social
risk
perception,
trust
politics,
pro-social
orientations
affect
also
conduct
two
tests
causality
estimated
relation
distancing
behavior.
The
test
incorporates
effect
reported
lockdown
on
involves
estimating
difference
regression
results
suggest
can
be
interpreted
causally.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
9, С. 100185 - 100185
Опубликована: Фев. 14, 2022
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
imposed
enormous
adversity
worldwide.
Public
health
guidelines
have
been
a
first
line
of
defense
but
rely
on
compliance
with
evolving
recommendations
and
restrictions.
This
study
sought
to
characterize
adherence
perceptions
public
over
one-year
timeframe
during
the
pandemic.