This
article
introduces
a
quantitative
approach
to
modeling
the
cost
of
control
in
neural
network
architecture
when
it
is
required
execute
one
or
more
simultaneous
tasks,
and
its
relationship
automaticity.
We
begin
by
formalizing
two
forms
associated
with
given
level
performance:
an
intensity
that
quantifies
how
much
information
must
be
added
input
achieve
desired
response
for
task,
we
treat
as
contribution
;
interaction
degree
which
performance
degraded
result
interference
between
processes
responsible
performing
inversely
related
develop
formal
expression
these
costs,
use
this
derive
optimal
policy
performance.
that,
turn,
quantify
tradeoff
automaticity,
suggest
can
used
normative
framework
understanding
people
adjudicate
benefits
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Год журнала:
2021,
Номер
25(9), С. 757 - 775
Опубликована: Июль 28, 2021
Humans
are
remarkably
limited
in:
(i)
how
many
control-dependent
tasks
they
can
execute
simultaneously,
and
(ii)
intensely
focus
on
a
single
task.
These
limitations
universal
assumptions
of
most
theories
cognition.
Yet,
rationale
for
why
humans
subject
to
these
constraints
remains
elusive.
This
feature
review
draws
recent
insights
from
psychology,
neuroscience,
machine
learning,
suggest
that
cognitive
control
may
result
rational
adaptation
fundamental,
computational
dilemmas
in
neural
architectures.
The
reviewed
literature
implies
multitasking
trade-off
between
learning
efficacy
processing
efficiency
the
intensity
commitment
task
reflect
stability
flexibility.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
Год журнала:
2022,
Номер
34(4), С. 569 - 591
Опубликована: Янв. 21, 2022
A
hallmark
of
adaptation
in
humans
and
other
animals
is
our
ability
to
control
how
we
think
behave
across
different
settings.
Research
has
characterized
the
various
forms
cognitive
can
take-including
enhancement
goal-relevant
information,
suppression
goal-irrelevant
overall
inhibition
potential
responses-and
identified
computations
neural
circuits
that
underpin
this
multitude
types.
Studies
have
also
a
wide
range
situations
elicit
adjustments
allocation
(e.g.,
those
eliciting
signals
indicating
an
error
or
increased
processing
conflict),
but
rules
governing
when
given
situation
will
give
rise
adjustment
remain
poorly
understood.
Significant
progress
recently
been
made
on
front
by
casting
as
decision-making
problem.
This
approach
developed
unifying
normative
models
prescribe
change
incentives
task
demands
result
changes
form
control.
Despite
their
successes,
these
models,
experiments
test
them,
yet
face
greatest
challenge:
deciding
select
among
multiplicity
configurations
take
at
any
time.
Here,
lay
out
complexities
inverse
problem
inherent
allocation,
close
parallels
problems
within
motor
choosing
between
redundant
limb
movements).
We
discuss
existing
solutions
control's
drawn
from
optimal
theory,
which
proposed
effort
costs
act
regularize
actions
transform
planning
into
well-posed
These
same
principles
may
help
shed
light
brains
optimize
over
complex
configuration,
while
providing
new
perspective
origins
mental
effort.
PLoS Computational Biology,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
19(1), С. e1010808 - e1010808
Опубликована: Янв. 19, 2023
Humans
can
learn
several
tasks
in
succession
with
minimal
mutual
interference
but
perform
more
poorly
when
trained
on
multiple
at
once.
The
opposite
is
true
for
standard
deep
neural
networks.
Here,
we
propose
novel
computational
constraints
artificial
networks,
inspired
by
earlier
work
gating
the
primate
prefrontal
cortex,
that
capture
cost
of
interleaved
training
and
allow
network
to
two
sequence
without
forgetting.
We
augment
stochastic
gradient
descent
algorithmic
motifs,
so-called
"sluggish"
task
units
a
Hebbian
step
strengthens
connections
between
hidden
encode
task-relevant
information.
found
introduce
switch-cost
during
training,
which
biases
representations
under
towards
joint
representation
ignores
contextual
cue,
while
promotes
formation
scheme
from
layer
produces
orthogonal
are
perfectly
guarded
against
interference.
Validating
model
previously
published
human
behavioural
data
revealed
it
matches
performance
participants
who
had
been
blocked
or
curricula,
these
differences
were
driven
misestimation
category
boundary.
Trends in Neurosciences,
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
46(3), С. 199 - 210
Опубликована: Янв. 20, 2023
How
do
humans
and
other
animals
learn
new
tasks?
A
wave
of
brain
recording
studies
has
investigated
how
neural
representations
change
during
task
learning,
with
a
focus
on
tasks
can
be
acquired
coded
in
ways
that
minimise
mutual
interference.
We
review
recent
work
explored
the
geometry
dimensionality
neocortex,
computational
models
have
exploited
these
findings
to
understand
may
partition
knowledge
between
tasks.
discuss
ideas
from
machine
including
those
combine
supervised
unsupervised
are
helping
neuroscientists
natural
learned
biological
brains.
For
flexible
goal-directed
behavior,
prioritizing
and
selecting
a
specific
action
among
multiple
candidates
are
often
important.
Working
memory
has
long
been
assumed
to
play
role
in
prioritization
planning,
while
bridging
cross-temporal
contingencies
during
selection.
However,
studies
of
working
have
mostly
focused
on
for
single
components
an
plan,
such
as
rule
or
stimulus,
rather
than
management
all
these
elements
planning.
Therefore,
it
is
not
known
how
post-encoding
selection
operate
the
entire
profile
representations
prospective
actions.
Here,
we
assessed
control
processes
unfold
over
representations,
highlighting
conjunctive
that
nonlinearly
integrate
task-relevant
features
maintenance
plans.
each
trial,
participants
prepared
two
independent
rule-based
actions
simultaneously,
then
they
were
retro-cued
select
one
their
response.
Prior
start
was
randomly
assigned
be
high
priority
by
cueing
more
likely
tested.
We
found
both
full
plans
maintained
preparation,
regardless
priority.
output
selection,
representation
high-priority
plan
enhanced
readily
selected
output.
Furthermore,
strength
associated
with
behavioral
interference
when
low-priority
Thus,
alternate
upcoming
integrated
served
target
attentional
mechanisms
prioritize
from
within
memory.
Humans
are
remarkably
limited
in
(a)
how
many
control-dependent
tasks
they
can
execute
simultaneously,
and
(b)
intensely
focus
on
a
single
task.
These
limitations
universal
assumptions
of
most
theories
cognition.
Yet,
rationale
for
why
humans
subject
to
these
constraints
remains
elusive.
This
review
draws
recent
insights
from
psychology,
neuroscience
machine
learning,
suggest
that
cognitive
control
may
result
rational
adaptation
fundamental
computational
dilemmas
neural
architectures.
The
reviewed
literature
implies
multitasking
tradeoff
between
learning
efficacy
processing
efficiency,
the
intensity
commitment
task
reflect
stability
flexibility.
Understanding
the
mechanisms
enabling
learning
and
flexible
use
of
knowledge
in
context-appropriate
ways
has
been
a
major
focus
research
study
both
semantic
cognition
cognitive
control.
We
present
unified
model
semantics
control
that
addresses
these
questions
from
perspectives.
The
provides
coherent
view
how
knowledge,
ability
to
flexibly
access
deploy
meet
current
task
demands,
arises
end-to-end
statistics
environment.
show
unresolved
issues
literatures,
including
operates
over
features
covary
with
one
another
representations
themselves
are
structured
emerge
through
learning,
series
behavioral
experiments
simulations.
conclude
by
discussing
implications
our
approach
other
fundamental
science,
machine
artificial
intelligence.
Scientific Reports,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
14(1)
Опубликована: Июль 22, 2024
Abstract
It
has
been
proposed
that,
when
processing
a
stream
of
events,
humans
divide
their
experiences
in
terms
inferred
latent
causes
(LCs)
to
support
context-dependent
learning.
However,
shared
structure
is
present
across
contexts,
it
still
unclear
how
the
“splitting”
LCs
and
learning
can
be
simultaneously
achieved.
Here,
we
Latent
Cause
Network
(LCNet),
neural
network
model
LC
inference.
Through
learning,
naturally
stores
that
tasks
weights.
Additionally,
represents
context-specific
using
context
module,
controlled
by
Bayesian
nonparametric
inference
algorithm,
which
assigns
unique
vector
for
each
LC.
Across
three
simulations,
found
LCNet
could
(1)
extract
function
task
while
avoiding
catastrophic
interference,
(2)
capture
human
data
on
curriculum
effects
schema
(3)
infer
underlying
event
naturalistic
videos
daily
events.
Overall,
these
results
demonstrate
computationally
feasible
approach
reconciling
scalable
from
laboratory
experiment
settings
settings.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Год журнала:
2023,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Июнь 11, 2023
Abstract
Flexible
action
selection
requires
cognitive
control
mechanisms
capable
of
mapping
the
same
inputs
to
different
output
actions
depending
on
context.
From
a
neural
state-space
perspective,
this
representation
that
separates
similar
input
states
by
Additionally,
for
be
robust
and
time-invariant,
information
must
stable
in
time,
enabling
efficient
readout.
Here,
using
EEG
decoding
methods,
we
investigate
how
geometry
dynamics
representations
constrain
flexible
human
brain.
Participants
performed
context-dependent
task.
A
forced
response
procedure
probed
trajectories.
The
result
shows
before
successful
responses,
there
is
transient
expansion
representational
dimensionality
separated
conjunctive
subspaces.
Further,
stabilizes
time
window,
with
entry
into
stable,
high-dimensional
state
predictive
individual
trial
performance.
These
results
establish
brain
needs
over
behavior.