Aspirin and clinical outcomes in individuals with incidentally diagnosed coronary artery stenosis
The American Journal of Medicine,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
2024 KSoLA Update on New Lipid-Lowering Agents: Inclisiran and Bempedoic Acid
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
14(2), С. 135 - 135
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Are We Using Ezetimibe As Much As We Should?
Biomarker Insights,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
19
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Lipid-lowering
therapies,
particularly
non-statin
regimens,
are
underutilized
as
~2/3
of
patients
with
atherosclerotic
cardiovascular
(CV)
disease
(CVD)
not
optimally
managed,
and
do
attain
target
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
concentrations,
despite
statin
treatment.
Statins
have
been
the
mainstay
hypolipidemic
therapies;
however,
they
plagued
by
adverse
effects,
which
partly
hindered
their
more
widespread
use.
Ezetimibe
is
often
first
added
mode
treatment
to
LDL-C
goals
it
efficacious
also
allows
use
a
smaller
dose
statin,
while
need
for
expensive
therapies
obviated.
We
herein
provide
comprehensive
review
effects
ezetimibe
in
lipid
lowering
reducing
CV
events
improving
outcomes.
Of
oral
ezetimibe,
contrast
newer
agents,
most
convenient
and/or
affordable
regimen
be
utilized
mono-
or
combined
therapy
supported
data
from
outcomes
studies
attesting
its
efficacy
CVD
risk
events.
When
could
lower,
thus
curtailing
side-effects,
effect
enhanced
(by
~20%)
percentage
level
(<70
mg/dL)
higher
versus
high-intensity
statin.
serve
an
alternative
cases
intolerance.
In
conclusion,
has
excellent
safety/tolerability
profile;
that
can
targets.
therapy,
limiting
occurrence
side-effects.
Язык: Английский
2024 KSoLA consensus on secondary dyslipidemia
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
39(5), С. 717 - 730
Опубликована: Авг. 30, 2024
Elevated
blood
cholesterol
and
triglyceride
levels
induced
by
secondary
causes
are
frequently
observed.
The
identification
appropriate
handling
of
these
essential
for
dyslipidemia
treatment.
Major
hypercholesterolemia
hypertriglyceridemia
include
an
unhealthy
diet,
diseases
metabolic
conditions
affecting
lipid
levels,
therapeutic
side
effects.
It
is
imperative
to
correct
prior
initiating
conventional
lipid-lowering
therapy.
Guideline-based
therapy
can
then
be
administered
based
on
the
subsequent
levels.
Язык: Английский
2024 KSoLA Consensus on Secondary Dyslipidemia
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
13(3), С. 215 - 215
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2024
Elevated
blood
cholesterol
and
triglyceride
levels
induced
by
secondary
causes
are
frequently
observed.
The
identification
appropriate
handling
of
these
essential
for
dyslipidemia
treatment.
Major
hypercholesterolemia
hypertriglyceridemia
include
an
unhealthy
diet,
diseases
metabolic
conditions
affecting
lipid
levels,
therapeutic
side
effects.
It
is
imperative
to
correct
prior
initiating
conventional
lipid-lowering
therapy.
Guideline-based
therapy
can
then
be
administered
based
on
the
subsequent
levels.
Язык: Английский
Escalating Lipid Therapy After Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL With Moderate-Intensity Statins in High-Risk Patients
Korean Circulation Journal,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
55(5), С. 426 - 426
Опубликована: Дек. 9, 2024
Guidelines
recommend
target
levels
of
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
and
intensive
lipid-lowering
therapy
(LLT)
in
high-risk
patients.
However,
the
value
escalating
LLT
when
LDL-C
targets
are
achieved
with
moderate-intensity
statins
is
unknown.
We
aimed
to
evaluate
benefits
escalation
this
population.
In
retrospective
propensity
score-matched
study,
we
screened
data
from
two
university
hospitals
between
2006
2021.
Of
54,069
patients
atherosclerotic
cardiovascular
disease
(ASCVD),
3,205
who
<70
mg/dL
were
included.
After
1:3
matching,
1,315
(339
976
without)
ultimately
examined.
The
primary
outcomes
major
adverse
cerebrovascular
events
(MACCE)1
(cardiovascular
death,
nonfatal
myocardial
infarction,
ischemic
stroke)
all-cause
death.
During
a
median
follow-up
5.7
years,
MACCE1
rate
was
not
significantly
lower
group
than
non-escalation
(9.8
14.3/1,000
person-years,
respectively;
hazard
ratio
[HR],
0.68;
95%
confidence
interval
[CI],
0.43-1.09;
p=0.11).
Kaplan-Meier
curves
showed
similar
results
(log-rank
risk
death
did
differ
groups.
MACCE2
rate,
which
additionally
includes
coronary/peripheral
revascularization,
(24.5
35.4/1,000
HR,
0.70;
CI,
0.52-0.94;
p=0.017).
hard
ASCVD
achieving
statins.
it
had
benefit
reducing
revascularization
rates
Язык: Английский
Clinical Efficacy of Ezetimibe Combined with Rosuvastatin in the Treatment of Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statin Therapy
British Journal of Hospital Medicine,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
85(11), С. 1 - 13
Опубликована: Ноя. 30, 2024
Aims/Background
Primary
hypercholesterolemia
(PHC)
is
a
major
risk
factor
for
atherosclerotic
cardiovascular
disease
(ASCVD).
Although
the
fact
that
statins
effectively
lower
low-density
lipoprotein
cholesterol
(LDL-C)
levels,
some
patients
fail
to
achieve
target
LDL-C
levels
and
continue
have
high
of
disease.
This
study
aims
evaluate
clinical
efficacy
safety
ezetimibe
combined
with
rosuvastatin
in
PHC.
Methods
retrospectively
examined
101
PHC
who
received
at
cardiology
department
Jilin
Province
FAW
General
Hospital,
between
2021
2024.
Patients
were
divided
into
observation
(ezetimibe
rosuvastatin,
n
=
45)
control
(rosuvastatin,
66)
groups
accordance
their
treatment
regimens.
Data
sourced
from
hospital's
electronic
health
records
system,
statistical
analysis
was
performed
by
using
SPSS
25.0
software
(IBM
Corporation,
Armonk,
NY,
USA).
Results
Baseline
characteristics
similar
two
groups.
After
12
weeks
treatment,
reduction
group
(–0.373
[–0.427,
–0.348])
greater
than
(–0.240
[–0.318,
–0.222],
p
<
0.001).
The
percentage
changes
total
(TC),
triglyceride
(TG),
high-density
(HDL-C)
significantly
better
(TC:
–0.230
[–0.302,
–0.144],
TG:
–0.292
[–0.333,
–0.237],
HDL-C:
0.081
[0.067,
0.111])
–0.127
[–0.158,
–0.119],
–0.082
[–0.101,
–0.067],
0.000
[–0.163,
0.133]
0.001,
0.011,
respectively).
Regarding
drug
safety,
incidence
adverse
events
comparable
(11.10%
vs.
12.10%,
0.871).
Conclusion
combination
demonstrates
superior
lipid-lowering
good
inadequately
controlled
statin
therapy,
providing
an
effective
alternative
option.
Further
large-scale,
multicenter
randomized
trials
are
warranted
confirm
its
long-term
safety.
Язык: Английский