Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Elsevier eBooks,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown
Опубликована: Янв. 1, 2025
Язык: Английский
Navigating Global Environmental Challenges: Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Emergence of Mega-Expertise
Climate,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
13(1), С. 20 - 20
Опубликована: Янв. 16, 2025
This
study
explores
the
nature
and
significance
of
a
crucial
form
global
environmental
expertise:
that
which
relates
to
conducting
assessments
with
aim
influencing
decision-making.
Drawing
on
theory
expertise,
conceptualizes
expertise
as
social
position
defined
by
epistemic
practice,
this
focuses
in
context
challenges—particularly
relating
climate
change
IPCC—highlighting
required
address
kind
complex
multifaceted
issue.
type
allows
for
synthesis
current
state
challenges,
proposal
options
action,
communication
these
findings
decision-makers
society
at
large.
shapes
knowledge
is
much
broader
than
single
disciplinary
field,
encompassing
both
ecological
dynamics,
development
recommendations
action.
finds
such
embodies
distinct
practice
four
key
characteristics
distinguish
it
from
more
narrowly
forms
introduces
term
“mega-expertise”
capture
character
expertise.
concludes
reflecting
implications
considering
its
relationship
traditional,
scientific
Язык: Английский
Unlearning modernity? A critical examination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Climatic Change,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
178(2)
Опубликована: Фев. 1, 2025
Abstract
Modernity's
ideals
of
progress
through
industrialisation,
coupled
with
rationalist
views
value-free
and
neutral
science
guiding
policymaking,
have
been
driving
forces
behind
the
climate
crisis
related
injustices.
Post-colonial
scholarship
calls
for
unlearning
this
modernist
paradigm.
This
study
examines
extent
to
which
Intergovernmental
Panel
on
Climate
Change
(IPCC),
preeminent
global
authority
change
knowledge,
is
both
shaped
by
procedural
logic
Eurocentric
modernity
tendencies
towards
these
characteristics
in
favour
more
pluralistic,
co-productive
approaches.
Through
an
inductive-deductive
qualitative
methodology,
including
semi-structured
interviews
IPCC
authors
policymakers
at
international
conferences,
paper
finds
be
situated
a
tension
field
between
it.
On
one
hand,
constrained
path-dependencies
modernity,
manifested
linear
model
knowledge
transfer,
differentiated
systems
policy
spheres,
privileging
Western
scientific
expertise
as
universally
valid
apolitical.
other
also
identifies
emergent
within
broadening
disciplinary
diversity,
incorporating
alternative
epistemologies
like
Indigenous
Local
Knowledge,
fostering
collaborations
scientists
policymakers.
These
nascent
"unlearning"
efforts
signal
cracks
modernity's
edifice,
though
limitations
potential
risks
caution
against
overstatement.
By
highlighting
critical
juncture,
contributes
empirical
conceptual
insights
into
IPCC's
transition
from
constraints
pluriversal
responses.
analysis
sheds
light
evolving
role
shaping
governance
ongoing
struggle
redefine
production.
Язык: Английский
From climate facts to climate risks. How the IPCC treats risk and uncertainty
Journal of Risk Research,
Год журнала:
2025,
Номер
unknown, С. 1 - 16
Опубликована: Апрель 10, 2025
Язык: Английский
Invaluable invisibility: academic housekeeping within the IPCC
Climatic Change,
Год журнала:
2024,
Номер
177(10)
Опубликована: Окт. 1, 2024
Abstract
This
article
discusses
“academic
housekeeping”
undertaken
within
IPCC,
understood
as
the
work
that
is
rarely
made
visible
or
rewarded,
but
nevertheless
essential
to
success
of
organization.
It
explores
conditions,
motivations,
and
implications
for
individual
researchers
involved
in
with
particular
emphasis
on
invisible,
un(der)recognised
unrewarded
they
engage
in.
The
empirical
material
consists
an
interview
study
IPCC
assessment
work.
concludes
a
discussion
experts,
expert
organisations,
academic
institutions.
Язык: Английский